TITLES OF NOBILITY & JURISDICTION
|Bigger text (+) | Smaller text (-)
TITLES OF NOBILITY
A "title" is a mark or designation, i.e., name by which anything is known.
In America, Titles of Nobility generally refer to government created designators such as citizen, driver, taxpayer and the like. While they may not appear to be "noble" they are created, never the less, to divide the populace
Contracts are enforceable.
When gold and silver was taken from the hands of the American people, by Executive Order in 1933, with complete disregard of the laws and limitations of the u. S. Constitution, it "became necessary" for the corporate United States to "create" a new system of law. They threw out common Law and Equity Law and switched it for Admiralty/Maritime Law (Negotiable Law) (now called Statutory Jurisdiction.)
Today, the courts we have are not courts of law; they are courts of Commercial Contract.
The Constitution, in Article I, Section 10 gives us the unlimited right to contract, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are enforceable.
"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven."
"Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided."
"The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings."
Though not specifically alleged, defendant's challenge to subject matter jurisdiction implicitly raised claim that default judgment against him was void and relief should be granted under Rule 60(b)(4).
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time."
"Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal."
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted."
"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist."
"Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities ; they are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal."
"Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather should dismiss the action."
"There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction."
"The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction."
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted."
Elk v. Wilkins is a 14th Amendment case, the concept is true concerning all federal citizens. In other words, all federal citizens must be, by their very definition, a person who is "completely subject" to the jurisdiction of the federal government (such as a citizen of Washington DC). Virtually any legal concept stated by the courts concerning a 14th Amendment citizen is operative upon all federal citizens.
"The persons declared to be citizens are, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject..."
"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. (See Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 US (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873)). Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."
"...the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state action by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment]."
Volume 20 of Corpus Juris Secundum at 1758: "The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state."
"There are two classes of citizens under our form of government, citizens of the United States and of the state; and one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter."
"The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other".
"...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship".Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
"It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a state, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual".
"We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it's own..."
"There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such".
NOTICE: Not meant to be exhaustive, complete or correct - please verify before any use.
Jurisdiction another view
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE MEANING OF THE TERM ‘UNITED STATES’
A Few (more) Cases on Jurisdiction
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.
Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.
If your copyrighted material has been posted on the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.
The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:
* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under which the material appears in Freedom-School.com search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
* A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)
Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at Freedom-School.com
Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly being filed.
Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2016
All Rights Reserved
H O M E