Court cases supporting no license needed to practice law
|Bigger text (+) | Smaller text (-)|
Private Attorney General Reveals Role Exposing Michael Jackson's Unlicensed Attorney
See also, Competent Counsel Questionaire
Study Finds Settling Is Better Than Going to Trial (Review comments made about this article HERE an interesting read.)
Subject: Supreme court cases supporting no license.
How the Crown Rules the World by MARK OWEN
Woe Unto You, Lawyers By Fred Rodell
[example] Motion to Disqualify Supplement
Reading Case Citations
Cases supporting 'Rights' located HERE
Cases supporting 'Rights and Liberties' located HERE
Cases supporting 'Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest' located HERE
Cases supporting 'no license' located HERE
Court Rulings Relating To Income Taxes located HERE
Cases expressing that labor is not taxable
Cases Relating To Banks Operating ultra vires
|NOTICE: Supreme Court and unknown author(s) are not affiliated with Freedom School.|
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.
Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2010
All Rights Reserved
H O M E