Law
usually enforced through a set of institutions,
applied to govern a group.
Consider that its all about jurisdiction / (subjugation) / control.
Consider law as written
is perfect, it is what we have to go with
- it is just a matter of -
is one subject to it, or not -- and that's called,
jurisdiction.
Knowledge of the Law = FREEDOM
At the close of the Constitutional
Convention Franklin was asked, “what kind of government have you wrought
for us?”
He replied, “...a Republican form of government if you
can keep it.”
And as he was listening
nearby
George Washington said, “and in order to keep it every man
must know the law.”
When Abraham Lincoln
studied law in his cabin what law books was he studying?
He was studying
books on the Common Law supplied to him by mail order.
Are you aware
-- Statutory and equity law now taught in universities did not come about
until Rockefeller financed its propagation beginning in the early 1900's
-
to serve his corporate purposes.
|
You don't need to know at first how
you're going to get to where you want to go. You just need to know where you want to go. (Items presented in no particular order) |
| Notes on
Jurisdiction
Howard Freeman: JURISDICTION Prerequisites for Subject Matter Jurisdiction UNDERSTANDING JURISDICTION Brief on jurisdiction located HERE James Manford
Kerr: A Treatise on the Law of
Pleading and Practice Helen Yu and Alison Guernsey: What is the Rule of Law? Leo C. Donofrio, J.D. The Federal Grand Jury is the 4th Branch of Government |
Foundational Maxim: Private rights and private property are beyond the control of government Administrative agencies must give you due process Pat Wagner, Bob Hurt, Larry Becraft, Tom Cryer and Peter Mancus On the subject of law Legal Information and Discussion For Students and Lay People Basically Law Americaīs Masonic Secret Civil liberties versus human rights People versus citizen's rights Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education (TCLEOSE) test your knowledge Francis Collins, J.D.: FALSE IMPRISONMENT "Government officials in general, and police officers in particular, may not exercise their authority for personal motives, particularly in response to real or perceived slights to their dignity. Surely, anyone who takes an oath of office knows - or should know - that much."
Erin Moriarty:
Will Fake DNA Spell Doom for Prosecutors?
Donīt Count on It.
TIDBIT: Why accept it? Fingerprinting is a subjective, untested, unverifiable identification procedure that purports to be infallible. One can acknowledge the nearly-100-year history of fingerprinting as a crime-solving tool but one also needs to consider that such history does not by itself support a decision to admit it.
How to Avoid Going to Jail under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001
In terms of the historical reference of our Rights, qui tam Plaintiffs put forth the fact that when the Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson the word he used in reference to our Natural Rights was “Inalienable” and that word was changed to Unalienable by John Adams at the time of publishing because John Adams believed Thomas Jefferson must have made a mistake (See Pauline Maier, American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993, p. 134.), and thereafter although many argued that the axiom of inalienable rights was written into the Bill of Rights as the Ninth Amendment rights “retained by the people,” it actually took the bloodiest event in United States history to produce a "stare decisis" doctrine in which our Rights were to once again be recognized as “Inalienable” (See Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)). The difference between unalienable and inalienable is important, simply because unalienable rights are subject to contract and inalienable rights are not: that is, servitude/peonage is a crime when defined in relation to a violation of one’s inalienable rights, and it does not matter whether or not the person knew or had reason to know, was willing or not or anything else; that is, peonage is a crime in the context of 18 U.S.C. § 1581 and 42 U.S.C. § 1994.
Read, learn and
act accordingly:
|
Excellent research opportunities:Google: Finding the laws that govern us United States
Statutes At Large:1789-1875
United States
Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Excellent: Help for Searching the United States Code UNDERSTANDING: THE MYTH OF THE RULE OF LAW Before martial law is declared to be the supreme law of the land, read this
|
|
Criminal Justice Education web site Resource
Case law to use in court may be located HERE and HERE
Cases supporting 'Rights' located HERE Cases supporting 'Rights and Liberties' located HERE Cases supporting 'Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest' located HERE Cases supporting 'no license' located HERE Court Rulings Relating To Income Taxes located HERE Cases expressing that labor is not taxable Cases Relating To Banks Operating ultra vires ACTS OF CONGRESS
HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN WHOLE OR Supreme Court
Case
Law STARE DECESIS -- Hale v. Henkel COMMENT:
ART: Black Robed Devil
Howard Freeman: The UCC Connection Discover Tort law Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah
Lawful Arrest, Search, Seizure, FAQ
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Police Corruption - Police Integrity Criminal Justice Resources
Someone say, Wrongful Conviction? Consider RANDALL
DALE ADAMS:
Adams v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Samuel Lynn: Davis -- Ratification Of Commencement And The Real Party In Interest
Intervention - Challenge the Law by Demanding Certification United States Bankruptcy
Fraud
MARBURY v. MADISON,
5 U.S. 137 (1803) CITES BY TOPIC: Mary Elizabeth
Croft: HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY Mary Elizabeth Croft: Interview Part I Part II Part III Part IV Part V Part VI Mary Elizabeth Croft: blog Spiritual Economics Now For further insight, consider: The Authority Hoax Commercial Affidavit of Truth When this CAT is filed and you tie yourself into a live document you tell them they had better do what they have sworn to do, Private Re-Affirmation of Oath of Office and Security Agreement ARE LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW? Private Attorney General Reveals Role Exposing Michael Jackson's Unlicensed Attorney Statutes, Slip Laws, and the US Code UCC §1-308 / §1-207, Code & Cites CITY OF RIVERSIDE,
ET AL., PETITIONERS V. SANTOS RIVERA, ET AL. - LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud Why We Are in the Admiralty Jurisdiction Think about it: If they can't show your signature, it is not your debt... Debt Collectors: And what you can do to Get Them Out of your Life 18 questions that will stop debt collectors abusive phone calls. Julio Martinez-Clark:
Someone say, "...research sites please."?Lists of United States Supreme Court cases The largest free collection of federal district court case law. WebSupp.org Search the Legal Dictionary Search the Webster's 1828 dictionary online Legal Research Sources
Fastcase Unveils 'Largest Free Law Library' Search thousands of court case documents using this Search Engine Various court cites Texas District and County Prosecution Attorneys' Jury Charges Texas Municipal Court Jury Charges Supreme Law Library : Reference : U.C.C. Code : UCC-1 UCC-4 UCC-5 UCC-6 Overview of the Forest Service Directive System A Blueprint for Hell on Earth! Liberty Lobby -- The Spotlight Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Be aware of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1091. Genocide
To cut costs, New Hampshire courts won't hold criminal or civil jury trials for a month. At least 19 other states have slashed court budgets and other state services. Even jury hiring is frozen Citizenship Status v. Tax Status William Tetley, Mixed jurisdictions: common law vs civil law (codified and uncodified) (Part I) Allocution: Oral declamation of rights and non-consent at sentencing Allodial Titles And Land Patents Fraud On The Court By An Officer Of The Court And Disqualification Of Judges, State and Federal Attorney's License? Ain't No Such Thing! What is a License? Here's One! Subject: Supreme court cases supporting no license. FAQ on US Judicial and Legal Corruption Dan Meador: Fraudulent Juristic Name Gordon Warren Epperly: Memorandum of Law on the Name Court Cases on Fictitious Names Dr. Eduardo
M. Rivera: Using the Organic Law to
Claim Your Freedom
James Jaeger: on the Second Amendment Constitution Society: Documentary History of the Bill of Rights
Not awake yet? Perhaps this might help you. Plead the 5th correctly in tax cases -- Lindsey Springer: On the Fifth and Sixth Amendments The Lost History of the Ninth Amendment Lindsey Springer: on the Tenth Amendment States move to support 9th & 10th Amendments The Original Intent of the 14th Amendment Jon Roland:
Discover: Etymology About: United States Code Notice of Error of Fact Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 (c.50) FOIA Update Search Form Commercial Liens for the Compulsory Bonding of Public Officials Someone say, "Foreclosure"?Set Aside Foreclosure and Decree and Motion for New Trial Enforcement Of Promissory Note Secured By Real Estate - WHERE’S THE NOTE: WHO’S THE HOLDER? Information concerning foreclosure: Livinglies's Weblog Promissory Notes: Another Path to Perfection The Title Insurance Nightmare Scenario WALL STREET'S MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITY
Josh Rosner On Massachusetts
Foreclosure Ruling:
ABA’s Model Rule 3.4 of Professional Conduct states, “A lawyer shall not… ‘state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of an accused…’”
Court Survival Guide - version A Court Survival Guide - version B (yes, there is a difference.)
Trial Advocacy Articles and Audio Recordings Francis H. Wellman: The Art of Cross-Examination
Electronic Magazines: The Frog Farm Bill Thorton:
on
motions Advanced Trial Handbook - Helpful Trial Information Million Dollar Case Themes That You Can Steal
Law Find-o-Matic A Question of Integrity - prosecutorial misconduct and abuses are taking place in the United States with little fear by the prosecutors of being held accountable for their wrongdoing. Gee, someone say, "contempt"? Sue A Judge? Judicial Immunity? Visit caught.net Dealing with Contempt of Court and much more... Did someone say, "interpreters, court interpreting"? click here JUDICIAL NOTICE / DEMAND FOR RIGHTS Dr. Phil Roberts: Comments on his case from Steadman Jackson Dred Scott vs. Sandford (1857) Presentments Index / Part I / Part II / Part III / Part IV / Part V / Part VI / Part VII Perception vs. Reality Procedure COURT RULINGS RELATING TO INCOME TAXES
Did someone say, "Due Process"
Get Out of Debt Free, totally Lawfully Private attorney general Private Attorney General.us When government
actions result in a financial loss it is a "taking" of property
which demands compensation. U.S. v. Causby, 328 US 256, 90 Led2d
1206, 66 Sct 1062 (1946)
|
STARE DECISIS
(As found in Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1957), pages 1577-78.)
"Federal courts should in all instances follow the law of the state with
respect to the construction of state statutes, and where that law has been
determined by the courts of last resort, their decisions are "stare decisis"
and must be followed, irrespective of federal courts' opinions concerning
what the law ought to be, but with respect to the pronouncement of other
state courts, federal courts are not so bound and may conclude that the
decisions does not truely express the state law. Kethaya v. Axton, D.C.N.Y.,
32 F.Supp. 266,268."
STARE DECISIS
"Stare decisis is the policy of the court to stand by precedent; the term
is but an abbreviation of stare decisis et quieta non movere — "to stand
by and adhere to decisions and not disturb what is settled." Consider the
word "decisis." The word means, literally and legally, the decision. Nor
is the doctrine stare dictis; it is not "to stand by or keep to what was
said." Nor is the doctrine stare rationibus decidendi — "to keep to the
rationes decidendi of past cases." Rather, under the doctrine of stare decisis
a case is important only for what it decides — for the "what," not for the
"why," and not for the "how." Insofar as precedent is concerned, stare decisis
is important only for the decision, for the detailed legal consequence following
a detailed set of facts."
United States Internal Revenue Serv. v. Osborne
(In re Osborne), 76 F.3d 306, 96-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,185 (9th
Cir. 1996)
"when a later decision of this court conflicts with one of our prior published decisions, we are still bound by the holding of the earlier case." Darrah v. City of Oak Park, 255 F.3d 301, 310 (6th Cir. 2001)
we are still bound by the holding of the earlier case. Sowards v. Loudon County, Tenn., 203 F.3d 426, 431 n. 1 (6th Cir.2000)
Gary Lawson, "The
Constitutional Case Against Precedent", 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y
23, 24 (1994).
Gary Lawson, "Mostly Unconstitutional: The Case
Against Precedent Revisited," 5 Ave Maria L. Rev. 1 (2007).
Jon Roland,
How stare decisis Subverts the Law — Column: Jun. 10,
2000.
Jon Roland,
Principles of Constitutional Interpretation
"Gee judge, are you saying that this court has the ability to overturn a higher court's decision?"
Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure, Art. 15.01
Texas Rules of Civil Proceedure on-line
1902: Texas Notary Protest Manual
1902
Good resource for NOTARY PROTEST
Civil RICO 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968
A Manual for Federal Attorneys
Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act,
Title 18, United States Code,
Sections 1961-1968
explained
"U.S. Attorneys" NOT "U.S.A. Attorneys"
See also,
Competent Counsel Questionaire
ARE LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW?
Proof That An Attorneys Retainer Is A Rip Off
Excuse me, as I am aware...
(and, may I bring this to the courtīs attention...)
"An attorney for
the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney
or a witness".
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not
sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary judgment,"
"Where there
are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to
rely on for a summary determination."
as found in,
Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647
(pag lee air
e o)
"Attorneys can't testify; statements of counsel in brief or
in oral argument are not facts before the court."
as found in, United
States v. Lovable, 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. 2004, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 and Gonzales
v. Buist, 224 U.S. 126 (1912)
A Corporation cannot sue the living man,
PERIOD.
They donīt want you to know this! SMILE!
See, Rundle v. DELAWARE & RARITAN CANAL CO. (1853)
The general rule is that
any statement by a witness or in a document that reports a fact asserted
by someone
who is not in court subject to cross-examination is inadmissible
hearsay!
If you donīt object it will hurt you every time!
"Excuse
me - it - appears as hearsay."
Hearsay is a statement made by a person
not in court, offered to prove the truth of the fact asserted.
With Regards to Trinsey v. Pagliaro
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges
"When the republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous"
--Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus (ca. 56 – ca. 117) a senator and
a historian of the Roman Empire.
Did someone say, "HJR 192"?
House Joint Resolution (HJR)192
Disscussion on House Joint Resolution 192 and its legal effect
NOTICE OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW
POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL BILL OF EXCHANGE
Liberty
Tree, Vol. 10, No. 6, May 2008
Proof That There Is a "Straw Man"
coram nobis "in our
presence" a writ of error.
coram vobis "in your
presence" a writ of error.
"Men gather in Secret Chambers, plot your destruction,
over the course of time, and ye know it not!"
Watch this 3 hour video of the Judges Conference where they do exactly that!
"Deconstructing America" videos Part 1 and Part 2 from Pennsylvania Court Injustice
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death! -- Full Documentary (1:48 min)
Manipulating Governments, Law & Courts; Drugging & Exterminating for Control & Profit!
VIDEO: The Court of Public Relations
A Casebook for Dealing with Extremist Legal Arguments: Idiot Legal Arguments
Classification of a cause of action as to whether it seeks a remedy "at law" or "in equity" remains important for several reasons of general significance:
(1) equitable remedies are generally enforceable by contempt while legal remedies are not;
(2) generally, litigants do not have a right to a jury trial to obtain equitable relief, whereas in many cases a right to a jury trial attaches to the suits "at law"; and
(3) "equitable relief is discretionary."
DAN B. DOBBS, DOBBS LAW OF REMEDIES, Vol. One at 11-12, 56-57 (West Publ’g Co. 2d ed. 1993).
Gee, someone say, "contempt"?
Corpus Juris Secundum
The Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) is an encyclopedia of U.S. law.
Its full title is
Corpus Juris Secundum: Complete Restatement Of The Entire American Law As Developed By All Reported Cases (1936- )
It contains an alphabetical arrangement of legal topics as developed by U.S. federal and state cases (1658-date).
C.J.S. Guides: guide 1 guide 2
* * * PUBLIC SERVANT QUESTIONNAIRE * * *
When you look around the web, you'll find a public servant questionnaire, but not like this one. I converted it to a single page so you can get a multi-part NCR form made up at Kinkos, Staples, Office Depot, etc.. Keep some by the door to your house and in your glove compartment to give to [any] law enforcement officers who want to ask you questions. Before answering theirs, I can make them answer mine. You'll find supporting law in 5 U.S.C. 552a. By Bob Hurt
Attorney's views of government abuse - tort or treason?
Question to the judge: "Excuse me, am I entitled to know the nature and cause of the accusation against me?"
Judge: Yes
"Well
then before we go forward I need to know, to be made aware of the
nature and cause of the accusation against me."
[nature is either civil or criminal /
cause is either common law (show damaged party) or admiralty
(show contract.]
See also,
Competent Counsel Questionaire
American Legal System Is Corrupt Beyond Recognition, Judge Tells Harvard Law School
Chief Justice Marshall, in the course of the debates of the Virginia State Convention of 1829--1830 (pp. 616, 619), used the following strong and frequently quoted language: 'The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside; it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience? * * * I have always thought, from my earliest youth till now, that the greatest scourge an angry Heaven ever inflicted upon an ungrateful and a sinning people, was an ignorant, a corrupt, or a dependent Judiciary.' In a very early period of our history, it was said, in words as true to-day as they were then, that ' if they (the people) value and wish to preserve their Constitution, they ought never to surrender the independence of their judges.' O'Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516, 532 (1933).
Scandal in
Louisiana's
Criminal Courts
In a suicide note,
reflections on guilt
Joint Resolution authorizing and requesting the President to proclaim 1983 as the “Year of the Bible.” Public Law 97-280
VIDEO: How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room
# 1. I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows.
I ask humbly for Remedy.
# 2. I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows.
Your honor I humbly ask for cure and maintenance.
# 3. Your honor I wish to establish that I am a living being.
The flesh lives and the blood flows and we are sovereign and nothing stands between myself and the divine.
"THE STATE OF TEXAS"
fact or fiction?
In Texas "Peace officer" means a person elected, employed, or appointed as a peace officer under Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 51.212 or 51.214, Education Code, or other law.
Don't Share That Law! It's Copyrighted He's giving you access, one document at a time
Scott Henson: Welcome to Texas justice: You might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride. Grits for Breakfast
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted- and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now, that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."
--from Ayn Rand's, "Atlas Shrugged", 1957
Bottom
line:
How can we call ourself a free people and teach our children that
they too are free,
when the government that we created to protect our
freedoms,
funds itself and provides its services at the point of a gun?
Specialty Areas
All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence. |
||
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}