guards his mouth and tongue
soul from troubles.”
“Do not speak in the hearing of
For he will despise the wisdom of
[Prov. 23:9, Bible, NKJV]
“Set a guard, O Lord, over my
Keep watch over the door of my
Do not incline my heart to any
To practice wicked works
With men who work iniquity;
And do not let me eat of their
[Psalms 141:3-4, NKJV]
He who has
knowledge spares his words,
And a man of
understanding is of a calm spirit.
Even a fool
is counted wise when he holds his peace;
shuts his lips, he is considered perceptive.
26 U.S.C. Section
7701(a)(14) defines the word “taxpayer”
Section 7701(a)(14) Definitions
''taxpayer'' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax.
Now if we look up the definition of “subject to”
in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1425, we find the
subordinate, subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by;
provided that; provided; answerable for.
Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 345 Mo. 650, 136 S.W.2d 289,
So being a “taxpayer” means being either someone
who is liable to pay tax or who isn’t liable but who has
chosen to “volunteer” for the tax or be subservient to it.
When one volunteers for the tax, they are considered to be liable
because they assess themselves and claim they have taxable income, even if
their income is not, in fact, taxable. By definition then, a
“taxpayer” is someone liable for paying tax no matter how you look at
it. Incidentally, this is the
term the government and especially the IRS uses to describe EVERYONE,
which by implication deceives EVERYONE into thinking they are liable for
the tax. They win the war
before it ever gets started just by the language they use.
You have to watch these weasels!
You should therefore refuse to allow any IRS or State revenue
office to call you a “taxpayer” and you should emphatically challenge
every use of the word. Here
is the way one of our readers humorously described it, and we LOVE his
I refuse to
allow any IRS or State revenue office to call me or any client a
"taxpayer". Just because I may look like one or have the
attributes of one does not necessarily make me one. To one IRS lady, and I
have no reason to doubt that she fits this category, I use the following
example. "Miss you have all of the equipment to be a whore, but that
does not make you one by presumption." Until it is proven by a
preponderance of evidence I must assume you are a lady and you will be
treated as such. Please have the same respect for me, and don't slander my
reputation and defame my character by calling me a whore for the
government, which is what a "taxpayer" is.
Therefore, we should be VERY CAREFUL with the
language we use, and NEVER describe ourselves as a taxpayer to anyone, and
especially the IRS or the courts. Instead,
use the term “American” and vehemently renounce anyone who uses the
“taxpayer” word to describe us. When
they use the word, tell them they are wrong and demand that they satisfy
the burden of proof under the administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C.
Section 556(d), which says:
Hearings; presiding employees; powers and duties; burden of proof;
evidence; record as basis of decision
as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order
has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be
received, but the agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the
exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A
sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on
consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party
and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and
The agency may, to the extent consistent with the interests of
justice and the policy of the underlying statutes administered by the
agency, consider a violation of section 557(d)
of this title sufficient grounds for a decision adverse to a party who has
knowingly committed such violation or knowingly caused such violation to
occur. A party is entitled to present his case or defense by oral or
documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such
cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the
facts. In rule making or determining claims for money or benefits or
applications for initial licenses an agency may, when a party will not be
prejudiced thereby, adopt procedures for the submission of all or part of
the evidence in written form.
Always leave the burden of proving you are liable
for tax up to the IRS or you will lose every time!
We also need to thoroughly understand how to apply
the guidance in this section to legal settings and litigation.
If we take the government into court to defend our Constitutional
right to not pay income taxes, it is very important that we not
use as the basis for our claim any statute from law that depends on us
being a “taxpayer”, because by doing so, we are claiming to be a
record does not call upon us to examine into this challenge of the
validity of these statutory provisions, similar as they are to those of
many other states and of a seemingly equitable character, for the reason
that the appellants, by their action in instituting a proceeding for
the valuation of their stock, pursuant to these statutes, which is still
pending, waived their right to assail the validity of them. Great
Falls Mfg. Co. v. Atty. Gen. 124
U.S. 581 , 31 L. ed. 527, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 631; Electric Co. v. Dow, 166
U.S. 489 , 41 L. ed. 1088, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 645; Pierce v. Somerset R.
U.S. 641 , 43 L. ed. 316, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 64; Leonard v. Vicksburg, [244
U.S. 407, 412] S. & P. R. Co. 198
U.S. 416, 422 , 49 S. L. ed. 1108, 1111, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 750. They
cannot claim the benefit of statutes and afterwards assail their validity.
There is no sanctity in such a claim of constitutional right as prevents
its being waived as any other claim of right may be.”
[Wall v. Parrot Silver and Copper Company, 244 U.S. 407 (1917)]
Below is an example of
just such a statute from the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of
Note that we have underlined and boldfaced the word “taxpayer”
1203. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT FOR MISCONDUCT.
to subsection (c), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall terminate
the employment of any employee of the Internal Revenue Service if there is
a final administrative or judicial determination that such employee
committed any act or omission described under subsection (b) in the
performance of the employee’s official duties. Such termination shall be
a removal for cause on charges of misconduct.
acts or omissions referred to
subsection (a) are—
(1) willful failure to obtain the required approval signatures
on documents authorizing the seizure of a taxpayer’s
personal belongings, or business assets;
(2) providing a false statement under oath with respect
to a material matter involving a taxpayer or taxpayer
(3) with respect to a taxpayer, taxpayer
or other employee of the Internal Revenue Service, the violation
(A) any right under the Constitution of the United
(B) any civil right established under—
(i) title VI or VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
(ii) title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972;
(iii) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(iv) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975;
(v) section 501 or 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973; or
(vi) title I of the Americans with Disabilities
(4) falsifying or destroying documents to conceal mistakes
made by any employee with respect to a matter involving
a taxpayer or taxpayer representative;
(5) assault or battery on a taxpayer, taxpayer
or other employee of the Internal Revenue Service, but
only if there is a criminal conviction, or a final judgment
by a court in a civil case, with respect to the assault or battery;
(6) violations of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Department
of Treasury regulations, or policies of the Internal Revenue
Service (including the Internal Revenue Manual) for the
purpose of retaliating against, or harassing, a taxpayer,
representative, or other employee of the Internal Revenue
(7) willful misuse of the provisions of section 6103 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for the purpose of concealing
information from a congressional inquiry;
(8) willful failure to file any return of tax required under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on or before the date prescribed
therefor (including any extensions), unless such failure
is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect;
(9) willful understatement of Federal tax liability, unless
such understatement is due to reasonable cause and not to
willful neglect; and
(10) threatening to audit a taxpayer for the purpose
extracting personal gain or benefit.
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Internal Revenue
may take a personnel action other than termination for an
act or omission under subsection (a).
(2) DISCRETION.—The exercise of authority under paragraph
(1) shall be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue and may not be delegated to any other
officer. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in his sole
discretion, may establish a procedure which will be used to
determine whether an individual should be referred to the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue for a determination by the
Commissioner under paragraph (1).
(3) NO APPEAL.—Any determination of the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue under this subsection may not be appealed
in any administrative or judicial proceeding.
purposes of the provisions described in clauses (i), (ii), and (iv) of
subsection (b)(3)(B), references to a program or activity receiving
Federal financial assistance or an education program or activity receiving
Federal financial assistance shall include any program or activity
conducted by the Internal Revenue Service for a taxpayer.
If you try to prosecute
an IRS agent and use any of the above statutes that use the word
“taxpayer” as the legal basis for your claim, then you are a Fool
with a capital “F”. You
don’t need a statute like the above to sue an IRS agent, and if you cite
the above statute, you are indirectly claiming that you are a
“taxpayer”…BAD IDEA! Instead,
all you need to do is invoke the equity jurisdiction of any federal court
and show that your property rights were invaded and injured.
You can cite as your authority, for instance, the Supreme Court
case of Marbury v. Madison, which states:
essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every
individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an
injury. One of the first
duties of government is to afford that protection…”
“it is the
general indisputable rule, that where there is a legal right, there is
also a legal remedy by suit, or action at law, whenever that right is
government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government
of laws, and not of men. It
will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish
no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right…”
government of the United States is the latter description.
The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that
those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is
written. To what purpose are
powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to
writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to
be restrained? The
distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is
abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are
imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed, are of equal obligation.
It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the
constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the
legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.”
U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137; 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803)]
You can also cite other
parts of the U.S. codes as your basis, but only when
they use the word “person” instead of
“taxpayer” when referring to the injured party, which is going to be
you. Here are a few examples
of statutes that do not use the word “taxpayer” for the most part, and
instead use the word “person”:
U.S.C. §6304: Fair tax collection practices
U.S.C. §7214: Offenses
by Officers and Employees of the United States
Likewise, when you are dealing with state taxing
authorities, watch your use of the word “this State” or “State of”
or “State”. If you use
these terms to describe your residency or yourself, this is tantamount to
admitting that you are a resident of the federal zone who has no
Constitutional rights! Here’s
the federal definition of “State”:
U.S.C.§7701(a)(10) State. -- The
term "State" shall be construed to include the District of Columbia,
where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this
And here is California’s definition of “State”,
right from the California Revenue and Taxation Code:
“In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior
[outside] limits of the [Sovereign] state of California and includes
[only] all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United
"State" includes the District of Columbia, and the
possessions of the United States.
[which don’t include the 50 sovereign states but do include federal
enclaves within those states]
You can read the
last quote above for yourself at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=rtc&group=17001-18000&file=17001-17039.1.
Instead of using “State of” or “this State”, you should
just use the name of the state, such as “I’m a citizen of California
and I live in California” rather than “I’m a citizen of the State of
California and I live in the State of California.”
Similar arguments apply to the following important terms:
can’t very well tell you to stop using certain words without replacing
them with something.
We have therefore prepared a table showing you how you need to
modify your language to avoid throwing yourself into a due process trap or
creating false presumptions about yourself.
The left column is the word you used to use and the middle column
is the replacement word.
The right column of the below table describes why you need to use
the substitute word instead of the original word.
The terms in the left column are in alphabetical order:
Due process word traps to avoid
Reason for the change
and write address as follows:
John Paul Jones ©
c/o 4606 Any Court
Oakland, California 
The “Address” is a
“federal area” commercial term.
of the United States”
“non-citizen national” pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
§§1101(a)(21) and 1452
Being a U.S. citizen is BAD
because such persons have no rights.
“date of birth”
“Date of Birth” is a legal
U.S.C. §911 and 26
U.S.C. §162(a)(2) define
your “tax home”.
Includes is a slippery word
that the government likes to use to basically turn a definition into
a non-definition and violate your due process rights.
The Supreme Court defines
“income” as “corporate profit” and you aren’t a
name and surname”
One’s name in law states
Sign “non-assumpsit” on any
traffic ticket you get. Go
to court within 3 days-ask if intend to pursue prosecution.
If yes, demand that the government present a “verified
complaint”. All crimes need an injured party and asking for a
“verified complain” requires the government to produce an
injured party. Traffic
tickets don’t have injured parties.
A person is defined in 26
U.S.C. §7701(a)(1) as an “individual” and an “individual” is defined in
26 CFR §1.1441-1(c)(3) as an alien or nonresident alien. “U.S. citizens” are not included in the definition of
Residence is a place of
conducting a “trade or business”
“transient foreigner” or “stateless person”
A “resident” is defined as
someone who lives in the federal zone.
a copyright symbol next to your signature and put “Authorized
Representative” and then put “All rights reserved without
prejudice, UCC 1-207”.
Signing without qualifying your
signature or copyrighting it or reserving your rights invites
creates the possibility that you may be signing away your rights and
inviting the government to enter your name or personal information
into their computer systems. They can’t enter anything copyrighted into their computer
“nontaxpayer” or “NOT a taxpayer as defined in 26 U.S.C.
§7701(a)(14) TA \s "26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(14)"
“taxpayers” are liable
for tax and subject to the Internal Revenue Code, and
you don’t want to be one of these!
“trade or business”
Work not connected to a "public office" or performed
in the "United States"
or business” is defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) as “the functions
of a public office”. All “taxpayers” are public officers in the
“under penalty of perjury”
declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under
the laws of the United States of America 28 U.S.C. §1746(1) that
the foregoing is true and correct”
This ensures that you don’t
inadvertently fool the government doesn’t think that you are in
the federal zone when you are signing.
States of America”
Use “United States of
America” to describe your “dwelling” place.
In referring to the applicability of federal income taxes,
qualify “United States” by adding the word “federal” to the
“non-citizen national” pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
§§1101(a)(21) and 1452
Being a statutory "U.S. citizen"
as defined in 8 U.S.C. §1401 is BAD
because such persons have no rights.
not connected with a "trade or business" from outside the "United
States" which are part of a "foreign estate" pursuant to 26 U.S.C.
U.S.C. §3401(a) defines “wages” as “all remuneration for services
performed by an “employee” (an elected or appointed officer of
the U.S. government defined in 26 CFR §3401(c )-1) for his
you aren’t an “employee” as legally defined, then you don’t
Any government form that you see with the above words in the left
column, you should replace them with the words in the middle column.
Be sure to read and understand the whole table above before you
start filling out government forms, and especially tax or citizenship or
voter registration or jury service forms.
We have modified several IRS forms to remove all the presumptions
indicated above, and the modified forms appear on our website at the
Don’t let evil and idolatrous and greedy
politicians, lawyers, and IRS employees distort and destroy the very
meaning of our language with their profane babblings, because:
words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty.”
[Confucius, circa 500 B.C.]
Instead, God commands us to shun the
“profane babblings” of such evil doers in 2 Timothy 2:15-17:
diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does
not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
But shun profane babblings for they will increase to more
ungodliness. And their
message will spread like cancer.”
[2 Timothy 2:15-17, Bible, NKJV]
Knowledge, diligent action, and speaking out against
injustice frequently are the only weapons we have against the government
and their evil propaganda. We need to learn to think and communicate with precision,
passion, and force if we will ever win this war of words!