From Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <email@example.com> or <firstname.lastname@example.org> or <email@example.com>
(Ed. Note: Reader is advised to review received comments below.)
SUBJECT: JACK & MARGY FLYNN DO NOT HAVE 300 WINS OF THEIR OWN AND NOR DO THEY HAVE 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!! – IN FACT THEY HAVE NEVER EVEN WON EVEN JUST A MERE 3 CRIMINAL CASES OR ANY OTHER CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE ON ANYTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN A CIVIL INFRACTION WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!!!
Many people have sent me emails from Oregon, Colorado, Arizona, Massachusetts and now Texas asking me if I think that it’s worth their time to go to the upcoming JACK & MARGY FLYNN seminar to be held in TEXAS???
Here is my answer:
As far as I know, other than Lloyd Smith at (360) 289-3429 or <firstname.lastname@example.org> or Kurt Ranald Riggin at (303) 463-4437 or <email@example.com> or <firstname.lastname@example.org>, I am the ONE (1) and ONLY REAL PATRIOT LEADER or SEMINAR SPEAKER in the entire Patriot Movement & Tax Honesty Movement to have ever shown CERTIFIED COPIES of actual COURT DOCKETS and CASE REPORTS of numerous WINS of numerous cases that were ALL DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE that I have WON for myself and numerous clients at all of my Seminars, in fact I also send out a list of recent WINS with TESTIMONIALS of people with phone numbers and email addresses that had SUCCESS using my FREE FLYERS to get past AN ENTIRE SQUAD OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AT A CALIFORNIA ROAD BLOCK where they were arresting anybody and everybody that did NOT have a DRIVER LICENSE. THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL TOLD MY CLIENT TO KEEP ON GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD EVEN THOUGH HIS LICENSE WAS EXPIRED!!!
I ALSO TELL PEOPLE AT ALL MY SEMINARS ABOUT ALL OF MY LOSSES TOO!!!
However, I am still WINNING in the 80% to 90% range or better and the 1 and ONLY reason that my WIN RATE IS SO LOW is because most people are TOO CHEAP to pay me to write an Appellate level brief and it is they who fumbled the ball or quit at the 50 YARD LINE!!!
Take a look at the Citizens of the American Constitution website. Tell me if I've missed anything - as I haven't seen their alleged 300 wins documented there!
The FALSE CLAIMS of WINNING 300 CASES by JACK & MARGY FLYNN is ABSOLUTE BULLcrap!!!
The FALSE CLAIMS OF WINNING 300 ASSOCIATED CASES by JACK & MARGY FLYNN is likewise ABSOLUTE BULLcrap!!!
Upon further investigation, it turns out that the ONLY WINS that 300 FALSE WIN ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN have ever WON was in their own SILLY MOCK COURT that they conducted themselves in a HOTEL ROOM that they rented, Ha, ha, ha, WHAT A JOKE, where was that, "THE JOKER'S WILD CASINO" in LAS VEGAS, NEVADA perhaps???
This is not the 1st or only request that I have received asking information about FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN, in fact I have received more than 20 similar requests about them over the last year.
Many people have called me the "SISKEL & EBERT / RALPH NADER / PEN & TELLER" of the Patriot Movement, Tax Honesty Movement and Freedom Movement in general, because I have exposed more scammers, more con men, more con women, more con artist’s, more "PATRIDIOTS", more "PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT" and more UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT PROVACATEURS, DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST’S and IRS SNOOPS than any other patriot in the entire movement and named names when I did it.
However, I have never seen any "PROOF" of any of either JACK or MARGY FLYNN’S alleged 300 WINS?
Where are the 300 CASE/CAUSE NUMBERS to PROVE 300 WINS???
Where’s the 300 CASE/CAUSE NUMBERS to PROVE 300 ASSOCIATED WINS???
FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS OR 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS STILL FALSE ADVERTISING!!!
FALSE ADVERTISING IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!
EITHER THEY CAN PROVIDE PROOF OF 300 WINS BY PROVIDING THE NAMES OF 300 REAL COURTS WITH 300 REAL CAUSE NUMBERS OR THEY CAN'T - PERIOD!!!
I have reviewed some of JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S BOGUS LEGAL PAPERWORKS and to me, it’s ALL OLD, OUTDATED & LONG OVERCOME PATRIOT CRAP that is 100% USELESS and NOT even worth you spending the money that it would take to pay for any copies to file in any court!!!
NONE OF THEIR PAPERWORK IS EVEN WORTH THE COST OF PRINTING A COPY AT COST AT ANY PRINT CENTER IF SOMEONE WAS TO LOAN YOU A COPY OF ANY OF THEIR FRIVOLOUS AND SILLY LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO PATRIOT BS!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S PAPERWORKS is 100% RANK AMATEUR LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO THAT WILL NOT WIN ANY KIND OF A CASE PERIOD!!!
It’s obvious as hell just from reading JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S frivolous legal mumbo jumbo paperwork that they have NEVER even taken a basic PARA-LEGAL COURSE as they clearly do NOT have even the requisite legal skills to write a COMPETENT MOTION TO DISMISS ANY KIND OF A CASE!!!
"... We demand that the court respect the Constitution, blah, blah, blah!!!
"... We demand this!
"... We demand that!
"... Hale v. Henkel [quotes,] blah, blah, blah!!!
"... Yick Wo v. Hopkins [quotes,] blah, blah, blah!!!
They cite some neat old cases, but honestly, MOST OF US HAVE SEEN ALL OF THIS SAME CRAP BEFORE and you can find these case quotes on just about any of the literally DIME A DOZEN of the HUNDREDS of PATRIOT WEBSITES that they probably pasted, copied and PLAGERIZED onto their website:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U. S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law, which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows: "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution arc null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
WE HAVE ALL SEEN MARBURY v. MADISON CASE QUOTES BEFORE!!!
How is Marbury v. Madison going to get your DUI, Driving While License Suspended, Driving Without a License, Speeding Ticket or No Insurance Ticket or cases dismissed???
What does Marbury v. Madison have to do with your case, duh?
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
What does Miranda v. Arizona have to do with your case - duh?
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, LIKEWISE IS ALSO OLD NEWS!!!
How is Miranda v. Arizona going to get your Driving Without a License or Driving While License Suspended case dismissed???
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442.
What does Norton v. Shelby County have to do with your case - duh?
NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY IS THE BIG WHOOPY DOO DOO!!!
Just quote Norton v. Shelby to the COP when he pulls you over for NO PLATES and SEE WHAT HAPPENS, HA, HA, HA!!!
Notice how the FLYNN’S do NOT write any common sense argument to show how any of these above mentioned cases even APPLY to your case in the 1st place???
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it: "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, WHAT KIND OF CRIMINAL OR CIVIL CASE WILL GET DISMISSED WITH THIS QUOTE???
Okay, it’s ALL neat stuff, interesting reading, but JACK & MARGY FLYNN have completely FAILED to bridge the gap and show any of us how we can use any of those cases to DISMISS ANY KIND OF A CASE!!!
ALL OF THEIR AMATEUR & INCOMPETENT LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO WRITINGS MAKE SIMILAR BROAD BLANKET STATEMENTS!!!
EVERYTHING THEY WRITE IS 100% COMPLETELY "OFF POINT" AND WON'T DO YOU 1 DARN BIT OF GOOD IN YOUR CASE!
How is any of the JACK & MARGY FLYNN case quotes above RELEVANT to beating your DUI case, your Driving While License Suspended case, your domestic violence case, your assault case, your drug possession case, No Insurance Ticket, No Seat Belt Ticket or even just a simple speeding ticket????
These RANK AMATEUR LEGAL BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN falsely advise Sherry Peel Jackson that she formally accept and bind the officers to their oaths, and hold them personally responsible for violating those OATHS, HA, HA, HA; WHAT A F**KING JOKE that is!!!
FIRST OF ALL JACK & MARGY FLYNN CITE THE WRONG STATE CONSTITUTION AND WRONG U.S. CONSTITUTION WHICH PROVES THAT THEY ARE 100% LEGALLY BLIND AND GROSSLY INCOMPETENT!!!
For EXAMPLE, here in Washington State the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON (RCW) clearly states that the CONSTITUTION is a mere STATUTE just like every other State does in it’s statute books!!!
"RCW 9A.04.110 Definitions.
(24) "Statute means the Constitution or an act of the legislature or initiative or referendum of this state."
The WASHINGTON CONSTITUTION is a RCW STATUTE as clearly stated in subsection (24) of RCW 9A.04.110!!!
THERE IS A STATUTE IN EVERY STATE THAT SAYS THAT YOUR STATE CONSTITUTION IS A STATUTE JUST LIKE HERE IN WASHINGTON!!!
This is so because EVERY STATE is a United States Corporation that has a FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER and is masquerading or foisting itself off to the public as a State.
The FACT is that the 13 UNION STATES or THE 50 SEVERAL STATES under "THE OLD UNION" no longer exists and ALL of the "States" in ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ceased to exist at the end of the Civil War in 1860 and were ORDERED pursuant to the 5th article of THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS to put a NEW CONSTITUTION in place or in "re-placement" of the 1st and ORIGINAL DEJURE Constitutions which have ALL been placed into THE ARCHIVES DIVISION of the office of the SECRETARY OF STATE period.
These NEW CONSTITUTIONS have all been CODIFIED and made into a MERE STATUTE which is only PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE LAW and Parosa v. Tacoma, supra, makes it clear that the RCW VOLUME 0 [constitution](sic) is NOT the law.
Then JACK & MARGY FLYNN falsely state that they can BIND the officers to their OATHS when quite the opposite, the Washington State Supreme Court has clearly stated that THE REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON IS NOT THE LAW and the same is true in every other CORPORATE STATE, i.e., the statutes in every single STATE are NOT the LAW!!!
"But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. The compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no thought of doing so ..." ...the act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled "REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON," WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc." PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409 (Dec.22, 1960).
GEE, how in the hell are JACK & MARGY FLYNN going to BIND THE OFFICERS TO THEIR OATHS, when the RCW CONSTITUTION is just a mere STATUTE found in Volume 0 of the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON WHICH the Washington State Supreme Court has already clearly stated IS NOT THE LAW, DUH???
DUH, THE JUDGES RCW OATH REQUIREMENTS TO UPHOLD THE RCW VOLUME 0 CONSTITUTION . . . CLEARLY . . . DOESN'T MEAN DIDDLY!!!
THE SAME IS TRUE IN EVERY STATE!!!
THE STATUTORY OATHS WHICH ARE NOT THE LAW Don't MEAN DIDDLY!!!
In all the DEFACTO DOCTRINE CASES, the case law clearly shows that you can only collaterally attack a DEFACTO OFFICIAL PRE-TRIAL and cannot collaterally attack a DEFACTO OFFICIAL after trial!!!
SO WHAT REALLY HAPPENS WHEN YOU PROPERLY CHALLENGE A JUDGE PRE-TRIAL WHO HAS NOT TAKEN AND FILED HIS OATH OF OFFICE PRIOR TO ASSUMING THE DUTIES OF HIS OFFICE???
They simply bring in another JUDGE who has TIMELY taken and FILED his or her OATH prior to assuming the duties of his or her office!!!
SO NOW THAT THEY JUST SLAMMED JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S SILLY BINDING THE JUDGES TO THEIR OATH ARGUMENT BY BRING IN A JUDGE WHO HAS TAKEN AND FILED HIS OR HER STATUTORY OATHS, WHAT’S JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S NEXT SILLY ARGUMENT GOING TO BE, THE GOLD FRINGED FLAG OR THEY SPELL YOUR NAME IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS???
These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN have clearly demonstrated their GROSS INCOMPETENCE AND IGNORANCE OF THE LAW!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN like EDWIN RIVERA, PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL, JAIL FOR JUDGES AND RON PAUL ALL CITE THE WRONG STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE WRONG U.S. CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL "IGNORANT OF THE LAW."
JACK & MARGY FLYNN, EDWIN RIVERA, PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL, JAIL FOR JUDGES & RON PAUL ARE TRULY THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND!!!
None of these AMATEURS use or cite the 1st Original Dejure Constitutions for any of the 50 Several States in THE OLD UNION!!!
All of these AMATEURS including GRASSHOPPERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN cite and use the PHONY CORPORATE CHARTER STATUTE CONSTITUTIONS for the Federal Municipal Corporate STATES which all have FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBERS!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S PAPERWORK IS NO BETTER THAN THE FORMER RIGHTWAY LAW CRAP THAT WE ALL NOW CALL "WRONGWAY LAW"!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNNS FRIVOLOUS PAPERWORK IS NO BETTER THAN TEAM LAW, AWARE LAW OR ERWIN ROMMELL SCHOOL OF LAW CRAP EITHER!!!
... I am SOVEREIGN because I say so, blah, blah, blah!!!
EVERYTHING that both JACK & MARGY FLYNN write is OFF POINT and cites NO RELEVANT case law that would stand a rats ass chance in hell of WINNING ANY KIND OF A CASE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL!!!
I think it’s only fair that since JACK & MARGY FLYNN are claiming to allegedly have 300 WINS, that it would be fair to ask them to produce PROOF of 10% of 300 WINS, which is only a mere 30 WINS!!!
Sorry to bring all of you folks the TRUTH and BAD NEWS about Jack and Margy Flynn, but the FACT is that both of them together can't bring you PROOF that they have even WON 30 CASES, a mere 10% of the so called 300 WINS that they NEVER got!!!
Nobody cares whether or NOT the claim of an alleged 300 WINS is either their personal WIN or if they are 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!
But EVERYONE wants to see 300 CASE NUMBERS of either or both their WINS and ASSOCIATED WINS!!!
So lets see it, WHERE’S THE BEEF, yeah that’s RIGHT, these 2 BULLcrapers can't produce 300 ASSOCIATED WINS either!!!
These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS Jack and Margy Flynn can't even produce 30 of their own wins!
These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS Jack and Margy Flynn can't even produce 30 ASSOCIATED WINS EITHER!!!
But you know what’s even FUNNIER?
These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS can't produce even just a mere 3 of their own WINS!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!
Please ask JACK & MARGY FLYNN to provide the Name of the Court, what City and County said Court is in and to provide us with 30 CASE NUMBERS so that we can all order a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT to establish and PROVE that they really got 10% or 30 of 300 CASES DISMISSED?
Please provide the Case Numbers here:
1.) Case No. _____________? 1.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
2.) Case No. _____________? 2.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
3.) Case No. _____________? 3.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
4.) Case No. _____________? 4.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
5.) Case No. _____________? 5.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
6.) Case No. _____________? 6.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
7.) Case No. _____________? 7.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
8.) Case No. _____________? 8.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
9.) Case No. _____________? 9.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
10.) Case No. ____________? 10.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
11.) Case No. ____________? 11.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
12.) Case No. ____________? 12.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
13.) Case No. ____________? 13.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
14.) Case No. ____________? 14.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
15.) Case No. ____________? 15.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
16.) Case No. ____________? 16.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
17.) Case No. ____________? 17.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
18.) Case No. ____________? 18.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
19.) Case No. ____________? 19.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
20.) Case No. ____________? 20.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
21.) Case No. ____________? 21.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
22.) Case No. ____________? 22.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
23.) Case No. ____________? 23.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
24.) Case No. ____________? 24.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
25.) Case No. ____________? 25.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
26.) Case No. ____________? 26.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
27.) Case No. ____________? 27.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
28.) Case No. ____________? 28.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
29.) Case No. ____________? 29.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
30.) Case No. ____________? 30.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!
JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!
It is NOT SLANDER for me to tell EVERYONE the TRUTH that JACK & MARGY FLYNN are BULLcraping ALL OF US by falsely claiming that they have 300 WINS!!!
I BET THAT JACK & MARGY FLYNN CAN'T EVEN PRODUCE A COMBINED TOTAL OF A MERE 30 WINS!!!
Asking them to provide us PROOF that they have WON even 10% of 300 CASES is only 30 CASES!
That shouldn't be too hard RIGHT???
Why can't JACK & MARGY FLYNN provide any PROOF of 30 of their own WINS???
Answer: Because JACK & MARGY FLYNN haven't even WON 30 CASES, that’s why!!!
This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS EITHER!!!
This pair of BULLcrapers used to FALSELY ADVERTISE that they had 300 WINS!!!
But ever since I sent people to several of their seminars around the country to ask them for PROOF of them WINNING 300 CASES, JACK & MARGY FLYNN ALL OF A SUDDEN CHANGED THEIR STORY and now claim that they have 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, but to DATE, they still have completely FAILED to provide any PROOF of their BULLcrap OF CLAIMING 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!
PRODUCE 300 WINNING CASE NUMBERS OR ADMIT THAT IT IS THE 2 OF YOU, JACK & MARGY FLYNN WHO ARE THE SLANDERERS, LIARS AND BULLcrapers!!!
PUT UP OR SHUT UP!!!
Producing PROOF of 30 of their own WINS or PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS shouldn't be too hard to produce if they have really WON 300 CASES or 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, RIGHT???
If they provide PROOF of WINNING 30 CASES of their own or an alleged 30 ASSOCIATED WINS, I will order CERTIFIED COPIES OF ALL 30 CASES and I will order copies of all the briefings in 3 cases at random and give them my thumbs up approval and recommendation "if" I find that their legal pleadings are COMPETENT!
However, my personal opinion is that they can't produce any PROOF that they have WON even 1% of 300 WINS which is only THREE (3) CASES on anything more important than a CIVIL INFRACTION WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!
Please provide 1% of 300 WINNING CASE NUMBERS which is a GRAND TOTAL of a MERE THREE (3) here:
1.) Case No. ____________? 1.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
2.) Case No. ____________? 2.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
3.) Case No. ____________? 3.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?
(CIVIL INFRACTIONS WHICH ARE "TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS" DO NOT COUNT!)
TOM HYLAND in NEW MEXICO allegedly WINNING a case of No Driver License, No Insurance, No Registration or Expired Registration WHICH ARE ALL CIVIL INFRACTIONS ARE LIKEWISE "TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS."
The so called METRIS CASE is a CIVIL CASE where it is TEN TIMES easier if NOT a 100 TIMES EASIER to WIN than any CRIMINAL CASE, because in the Civil Law you are either right or wrong and it’s strictly a statutory or court rule requirement which can be dismissed for something as trivial as failure to give proper service of both the summons and complaint, failure to file a proof of service, failure to appear or the statutes of limitation have expired or something else trivial like that!!!
However, a closer look at the FACTS clearly show that the ONLY WINS that these 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS ever got was in their own PHONY COMMON LAW COURT that they convened in a HOTEL ROOM, HA, HA, HA, WHAT A JOKE THESE 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS CLEARLY ARE!!!
ME, I AM WINNING SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES WHERE THE CLIENTS ARE CLEARLY GUILTY SUCH AS:
1.) DRUNK DRIVERS WHO ARE DRIVING DRUNK - AND SOME BLEW MORE THAN TWICE OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT.
2.) Guys growing more than 166 'pot' plants is obviously more than any competent attorney could ever hope to argue in front of any jury was only for personal use or is THE ULTIMATE USER!!!
Hey, I LOSE some cases here and there, but then if they were clearly DRUNK, they were clearly GUILTY weren't they, and therefore, since I am NOT responsible for anybody getting drunk and then getting behind the wheel, they can't honestly or truthfully say that I LOST their case - can they???
I TELL EVERYONE ABOUT MY LOSSES AS WELL AS MY WINS AT ALL OF MY SEMINARS!!!
Now if Jack and Margy Flynn attempt to make any false claims that there is NO CASE NUMBER because the case was dismissed, I can easily disprove that bogus excuse.
You can call any Court Clerk in any city or county in any State at either the Municipal, District or Superior Court level and EVERY Court Clerk in EVERY COURT will tell you that if you were ever charged with any offense, whether it be a civil infraction such as speeding or running a red light or with a more serious offense such as DUI, Driving While License Suspended, Assault, Domestic Violence, Drug Possession, etc., that they have a record of it and they just need you to give them the Case Number which is printed in the upper right hand corner of the citation or ticket that was issued to you by the arresting officer. – JUST SIMPLY DEMAND THEY PROVIDE YOU THE CASE NUMBER AND THE NAME OF THE COURT SO YOU CAN CALL THE COURT CLERK UP YOURSELF!
If Jack and Margy Flynn attempt to tell you that you can't get any PROOF that the case was dismissed because the court allegedly SEALED the case, I can easily disprove that bogus excuse also.
You can call any Court Clerk in any city or county in any State at either the Municipal, District or Superior Court level and EVERY Court Clerk in EVERY COURT will tell you that even if a Case was ordered to be SEALED, that they could still sell you a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT which would show or reflect that the case really was SEALED if you just provide them the Case Number which is printed in the upper right hand corner of the citation or ticket that was issued to you by the arresting officer.
When a case is SEALED, all that means is that you will not be able to get copies of the WINNING BRIEFS!!!
However you still will be able to get a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT even if a case was actually SEALED.
If they tell you otherwise, just simply demand that they tell you the name of the court and the Case Number and call the Court Clerk and ask the Court Clerk yourself and they will tell you that I am correct and that they are BS.
I believe that anyone who claims to have WON 300 CASES or an alleged 300 ASSOCIATED WINS would have absolutely no problem providing us with PROOF by providing us 300 CASE NUMBERS whether it’s their WIN or 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, don't you???
How about 30 CASE NUMBERS??? – THAT IS A MERE 10% of what they CLAIMED!!!
How about 3 CASE NUMBERS??? – THAT IS ONLY 1% of what they CLAIMED!!!
This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce any PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!
This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce any PROOF of 3 ASSOCIATED WINS of anything more important than a speeding ticket, running a red light or a parking ticket, ALL of which are CIVIL INFRACTIONS WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!!!
MY BOOTS AIN'T TALL ENOUGH!!!
BARNUM AND BAILEY SAID THERE’S A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE!
Anybody who believes someone’s claim of WINNING 300 CASES or an alleged 300 ASSOCIATED WINS at face value without checking into their credentials and NOT seeing any PROOF of WINNING EVEN 10% or 30 WINS of an alleged 300 WINS is THE SUCKER THAT BARNUM AND BAILEY WAS TALKING ABOUT!
CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a) and (b). and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my "consent" for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent responsible to deliver it to the Sender, please destroy the e-mail after advising by reply that you erroneously received this e-mail. The receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or "of-counsel client privilege," nor will it constitute a waiver of the "work-product doctrine." Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express prior "written consent" is liable for civil monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free "only" to those specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing list, please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing, 1911 S.W. Campus Drive, #118, Federal Way, Wash. 98023 or call and leave a message with your e-mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741
Email 1: email@example.com or
Email 2: firstname.lastname@example.org or
Email 3: email@example.com or
Email 4: firstname.lastname@example.org
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release Date: 8/5/2008 6:03 AM