JACK & MARGY FLYNN DO NOT HAVE 300 WINS OF THEIR OWN...

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-)

[As received]
From Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <rcwcodebuster@comcast.net> or <rcwcodebuster@yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster@gmail.com>

(Ed. Note: Reader is advised to review received comments below.)

SUBJECT: JACK & MARGY FLYNN DO NOT HAVE 300 WINS OF THEIR OWN AND NOR DO THEY HAVE 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!! – IN FACT THEY HAVE NEVER EVEN WON EVEN JUST A MERE 3 CRIMINAL CASES OR ANY OTHER CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE ON ANYTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN A CIVIL INFRACTION WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!!!

Many people have sent me emails from Oregon, Colorado, Arizona, Massachusetts and now Texas asking me if I think that it’s worth their time to go to the upcoming JACK & MARGY FLYNN seminar to be held in TEXAS???

Here is my answer:

As far as I know, other than Lloyd Smith at (360) 289-3429 or <godspastor@gmail.com> or Kurt Ranald Riggin at (303) 463-4437 or <kurt@gunsandyoga.com> or <dualglide64@yahoo.com>, I am the ONE (1) and ONLY REAL PATRIOT LEADER or SEMINAR SPEAKER in the entire Patriot Movement & Tax Honesty Movement to have ever shown CERTIFIED COPIES of actual COURT DOCKETS and CASE REPORTS of numerous WINS of numerous cases that were ALL DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE that I have WON for myself and numerous clients at all of my Seminars, in fact I also send out a list of recent WINS with TESTIMONIALS of people with phone numbers and email addresses that had SUCCESS using my FREE FLYERS to get past AN ENTIRE SQUAD OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AT A CALIFORNIA ROAD BLOCK where they were arresting anybody and everybody that did NOT have a DRIVER LICENSE. THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL TOLD MY CLIENT TO KEEP ON GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD EVEN THOUGH HIS LICENSE WAS EXPIRED!!!

I ALSO TELL PEOPLE AT ALL MY SEMINARS ABOUT ALL OF MY LOSSES TOO!!!

However, I am still WINNING in the 80% to 90% range or better and the 1 and ONLY reason that my WIN RATE IS SO LOW is because most people are TOO CHEAP to pay me to write an Appellate level brief and it is they who fumbled the ball or quit at the 50 YARD LINE!!!

Take a look at the Citizens of the American Constitution website. Tell me if I've missed anything - as I haven't seen their alleged 300 wins documented there!

The FALSE CLAIMS of WINNING 300 CASES by JACK & MARGY FLYNN is ABSOLUTE BULLcrap!!!

The FALSE CLAIMS OF WINNING 300 ASSOCIATED CASES by JACK & MARGY FLYNN is likewise ABSOLUTE BULLcrap!!!

Upon further investigation, it turns out that the ONLY WINS that 300 FALSE WIN ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN have ever WON was in their own SILLY MOCK COURT that they conducted themselves in a HOTEL ROOM that they rented, Ha, ha, ha, WHAT A JOKE, where was that, "THE JOKER'S WILD CASINO" in LAS VEGAS, NEVADA perhaps???

This is not the 1st or only request that I have received asking information about FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN, in fact I have received more than 20 similar requests about them over the last year.

Many people have called me the "SISKEL & EBERT / RALPH NADER / PEN & TELLER" of the Patriot Movement, Tax Honesty Movement and Freedom Movement in general, because I have exposed more scammers, more con men, more con women, more con artist’s, more "PATRIDIOTS", more "PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT" and more UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT PROVACATEURS, DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST’S and IRS SNOOPS than any other patriot in the entire movement and named names when I did it.

However, I have never seen any "PROOF" of any of either JACK or MARGY FLYNN’S alleged 300 WINS?

Where are the 300 CASE/CAUSE NUMBERS to PROVE 300 WINS???

Where’s the 300 CASE/CAUSE NUMBERS to PROVE 300 ASSOCIATED WINS???

FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS OR 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS STILL FALSE ADVERTISING!!!

FALSE ADVERTISING IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!

EITHER THEY CAN PROVIDE PROOF OF 300 WINS BY PROVIDING THE NAMES OF 300 REAL COURTS WITH 300 REAL CAUSE NUMBERS OR THEY CAN'T - PERIOD!!!

I have reviewed some of JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S BOGUS LEGAL PAPERWORKS and to me, it’s ALL OLD, OUTDATED & LONG OVERCOME PATRIOT CRAP that is 100% USELESS and NOT even worth you spending the money that it would take to pay for any copies to file in any court!!!

NONE OF THEIR PAPERWORK IS EVEN WORTH THE COST OF PRINTING A COPY AT COST AT ANY PRINT CENTER IF SOMEONE WAS TO LOAN YOU A COPY OF ANY OF THEIR FRIVOLOUS AND SILLY LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO PATRIOT BS!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S PAPERWORKS is 100% RANK AMATEUR LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO THAT WILL NOT WIN ANY KIND OF A CASE PERIOD!!!

It’s obvious as hell just from reading JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S frivolous legal mumbo jumbo paperwork that they have NEVER even taken a basic PARA-LEGAL COURSE as they clearly do NOT have even the requisite legal skills to write a COMPETENT MOTION TO DISMISS ANY KIND OF A CASE!!!

"... We demand that the court respect the Constitution, blah, blah, blah!!!

"... We demand this!

"... We demand that!

"... Hale v. Henkel [quotes,] blah, blah, blah!!!

"... Yick Wo v. Hopkins [quotes,] blah, blah, blah!!!

They cite some neat old cases, but honestly, MOST OF US HAVE SEEN ALL OF THIS SAME CRAP BEFORE and you can find these case quotes on just about any of the literally DIME A DOZEN of the HUNDREDS of PATRIOT WEBSITES that they probably pasted, copied and PLAGERIZED onto their website:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U. S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law, which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows: "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution arc null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

WE HAVE ALL SEEN MARBURY v. MADISON CASE QUOTES BEFORE!!!

How is Marbury v. Madison going to get your DUI, Driving While License Suspended, Driving Without a License, Speeding Ticket or No Insurance Ticket or cases dismissed???

What does Marbury v. Madison have to do with your case, duh?

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

What does Miranda v. Arizona have to do with your case - duh?

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, LIKEWISE IS ALSO OLD NEWS!!!

How is Miranda v. Arizona going to get your Driving Without a License or Driving While License Suspended case dismissed???

"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442.

What does Norton v. Shelby County have to do with your case - duh?

NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY IS THE BIG WHOOPY DOO DOO!!!

Just quote Norton v. Shelby to the COP when he pulls you over for NO PLATES and SEE WHAT HAPPENS, HA, HA, HA!!!

Notice how the FLYNN’S do NOT write any common sense argument to show how any of these above mentioned cases even APPLY to your case in the 1st place???

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it: "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, WHAT KIND OF CRIMINAL OR CIVIL CASE WILL GET DISMISSED WITH THIS QUOTE???

Okay, it’s ALL neat stuff, interesting reading, but JACK & MARGY FLYNN have completely FAILED to bridge the gap and show any of us how we can use any of those cases to DISMISS ANY KIND OF A CASE!!!

ALL OF THEIR AMATEUR & INCOMPETENT LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO WRITINGS MAKE SIMILAR BROAD BLANKET STATEMENTS!!!

EVERYTHING THEY WRITE IS 100% COMPLETELY "OFF POINT" AND WON'T DO YOU 1 DARN BIT OF GOOD IN YOUR CASE!

How is any of the JACK & MARGY FLYNN case quotes above RELEVANT to beating your DUI case, your Driving While License Suspended case, your domestic violence case, your assault case, your drug possession case, No Insurance Ticket, No Seat Belt Ticket or even just a simple speeding ticket????

These RANK AMATEUR LEGAL BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN falsely advise Sherry Peel Jackson that she formally accept and bind the officers to their oaths, and hold them personally responsible for violating those OATHS, HA, HA, HA; WHAT A F**KING JOKE that is!!!

FIRST OF ALL JACK & MARGY FLYNN CITE THE WRONG STATE CONSTITUTION AND WRONG U.S. CONSTITUTION WHICH PROVES THAT THEY ARE 100% LEGALLY BLIND AND GROSSLY INCOMPETENT!!!

For EXAMPLE, here in Washington State the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON (RCW) clearly states that the CONSTITUTION is a mere STATUTE just like every other State does in it’s statute books!!!

 

"RCW 9A.04.110 Definitions.

(24) "Statute means the Constitution or an act of the legislature or initiative or referendum of this state."

The WASHINGTON CONSTITUTION is a RCW STATUTE as clearly stated in subsection (24) of RCW 9A.04.110!!!

THERE IS A STATUTE IN EVERY STATE THAT SAYS THAT YOUR STATE CONSTITUTION IS A STATUTE JUST LIKE HERE IN WASHINGTON!!!

This is so because EVERY STATE is a United States Corporation that has a FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER and is masquerading or foisting itself off to the public as a State.

The FACT is that the 13 UNION STATES or THE 50 SEVERAL STATES under "THE OLD UNION" no longer exists and ALL of the "States" in ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ceased to exist at the end of the Civil War in 1860 and were ORDERED pursuant to the 5th article of THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS to put a NEW CONSTITUTION in place or in "re-placement" of the 1st and ORIGINAL DEJURE Constitutions which have ALL been placed into THE ARCHIVES DIVISION of the office of the SECRETARY OF STATE period.

These NEW CONSTITUTIONS have all been CODIFIED and made into a MERE STATUTE which is only PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE LAW and Parosa v. Tacoma, supra, makes it clear that the RCW VOLUME 0 [constitution](sic) is NOT the law.

Then JACK & MARGY FLYNN falsely state that they can BIND the officers to their OATHS when quite the opposite, the Washington State Supreme Court has clearly stated that THE REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON IS NOT THE LAW and the same is true in every other CORPORATE STATE, i.e., the statutes in every single STATE are NOT the LAW!!!

"But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. The compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no thought of doing so ..." ...the act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled "REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON," WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc." PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409 (Dec.22, 1960).

GEE, how in the hell are JACK & MARGY FLYNN going to BIND THE OFFICERS TO THEIR OATHS, when the RCW CONSTITUTION is just a mere STATUTE found in Volume 0 of the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON WHICH the Washington State Supreme Court has already clearly stated IS NOT THE LAW, DUH???

DUH, THE JUDGES RCW OATH REQUIREMENTS TO UPHOLD THE RCW VOLUME 0 CONSTITUTION . . . CLEARLY . . . DOESN'T MEAN DIDDLY!!!

THE SAME IS TRUE IN EVERY STATE!!!

THE STATUTORY OATHS WHICH ARE NOT THE LAW Don't MEAN DIDDLY!!!

In all the DEFACTO DOCTRINE CASES, the case law clearly shows that you can only collaterally attack a DEFACTO OFFICIAL PRE-TRIAL and cannot collaterally attack a DEFACTO OFFICIAL after trial!!!

SO WHAT REALLY HAPPENS WHEN YOU PROPERLY CHALLENGE A JUDGE PRE-TRIAL WHO HAS NOT TAKEN AND FILED HIS OATH OF OFFICE PRIOR TO ASSUMING THE DUTIES OF HIS OFFICE???

They simply bring in another JUDGE who has TIMELY taken and FILED his or her OATH prior to assuming the duties of his or her office!!!

SO NOW THAT THEY JUST SLAMMED JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S SILLY BINDING THE JUDGES TO THEIR OATH ARGUMENT BY BRING IN A JUDGE WHO HAS TAKEN AND FILED HIS OR HER STATUTORY OATHS, WHAT’S JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S NEXT SILLY ARGUMENT GOING TO BE, THE GOLD FRINGED FLAG OR THEY SPELL YOUR NAME IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS???

These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN have clearly demonstrated their GROSS INCOMPETENCE AND IGNORANCE OF THE LAW!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN like EDWIN RIVERA, PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL, JAIL FOR JUDGES AND RON PAUL ALL CITE THE WRONG STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE WRONG U.S. CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL "IGNORANT OF THE LAW."

JACK & MARGY FLYNN, EDWIN RIVERA, PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL, JAIL FOR JUDGES & RON PAUL ARE TRULY THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND!!!

None of these AMATEURS use or cite the 1st Original Dejure Constitutions for any of the 50 Several States in THE OLD UNION!!!

All of these AMATEURS including GRASSHOPPERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN cite and use the PHONY CORPORATE CHARTER STATUTE CONSTITUTIONS for the Federal Municipal Corporate STATES which all have FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBERS!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN’S PAPERWORK IS NO BETTER THAN THE FORMER RIGHTWAY LAW CRAP THAT WE ALL NOW CALL "WRONGWAY LAW"!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNNS FRIVOLOUS PAPERWORK IS NO BETTER THAN TEAM LAW, AWARE LAW OR ERWIN ROMMELL SCHOOL OF LAW CRAP EITHER!!!

... I am SOVEREIGN because I say so, blah, blah, blah!!!

EVERYTHING that both JACK & MARGY FLYNN write is OFF POINT and cites NO RELEVANT case law that would stand a rats ass chance in hell of WINNING ANY KIND OF A CASE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL!!!

I think it’s only fair that since JACK & MARGY FLYNN are claiming to allegedly have 300 WINS, that it would be fair to ask them to produce PROOF of 10% of 300 WINS, which is only a mere 30 WINS!!!

Sorry to bring all of you folks the TRUTH and BAD NEWS about Jack and Margy Flynn, but the FACT is that both of them together can't bring you PROOF that they have even WON 30 CASES, a mere 10% of the so called 300 WINS that they NEVER got!!!

Nobody cares whether or NOT the claim of an alleged 300 WINS is either their personal WIN or if they are 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!

But EVERYONE wants to see 300 CASE NUMBERS of either or both their WINS and ASSOCIATED WINS!!!

So lets see it, WHERE’S THE BEEF, yeah that’s RIGHT, these 2 BULLcrapers can't produce 300 ASSOCIATED WINS either!!!

These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS Jack and Margy Flynn can't even produce 30 of their own wins!

These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS Jack and Margy Flynn can't even produce 30 ASSOCIATED WINS EITHER!!!

But you know what’s even FUNNIER?

These 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS can't produce even just a mere 3 of their own WINS!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!

Please ask JACK & MARGY FLYNN to provide the Name of the Court, what City and County said Court is in and to provide us with 30 CASE NUMBERS so that we can all order a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT to establish and PROVE that they really got 10% or 30 of 300 CASES DISMISSED?

Please provide the Case Numbers here:

1.) Case No. _____________? 1.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

2.) Case No. _____________? 2.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

3.) Case No. _____________? 3.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

4.) Case No. _____________? 4.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

5.) Case No. _____________? 5.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

6.) Case No. _____________? 6.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

7.) Case No. _____________? 7.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

8.) Case No. _____________? 8.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

9.) Case No. _____________? 9.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

10.) Case No. ____________? 10.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

11.) Case No. ____________? 11.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

12.) Case No. ____________? 12.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

13.) Case No. ____________? 13.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

14.) Case No. ____________? 14.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

15.) Case No. ____________? 15.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

16.) Case No. ____________? 16.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

17.) Case No. ____________? 17.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

18.) Case No. ____________? 18.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

19.) Case No. ____________? 19.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

20.) Case No. ____________? 20.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

21.) Case No. ____________? 21.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

22.) Case No. ____________? 22.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

23.) Case No. ____________? 23.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

24.) Case No. ____________? 24.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

25.) Case No. ____________? 25.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

26.) Case No. ____________? 26.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

27.) Case No. ____________? 27.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

28.) Case No. ____________? 28.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

29.) Case No. ____________? 29.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

30.) Case No. ____________? 30.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!

JACK & MARGY FLYNN FALSE ADVERTISING OF 300 ASSOCIATED WINS IS FALSE ADVERTISING PERIOD!!!

It is NOT SLANDER for me to tell EVERYONE the TRUTH that JACK & MARGY FLYNN are BULLcraping ALL OF US by falsely claiming that they have 300 WINS!!!

I BET THAT JACK & MARGY FLYNN CAN'T EVEN PRODUCE A COMBINED TOTAL OF A MERE 30 WINS!!!

Asking them to provide us PROOF that they have WON even 10% of 300 CASES is only 30 CASES!

That shouldn't be too hard RIGHT???

Why can't JACK & MARGY FLYNN provide any PROOF of 30 of their own WINS???

Answer: Because JACK & MARGY FLYNN haven't even WON 30 CASES, that’s why!!!

This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS EITHER!!!

This pair of BULLcrapers used to FALSELY ADVERTISE that they had 300 WINS!!!

But ever since I sent people to several of their seminars around the country to ask them for PROOF of them WINNING 300 CASES, JACK & MARGY FLYNN ALL OF A SUDDEN CHANGED THEIR STORY and now claim that they have 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, but to DATE, they still have completely FAILED to provide any PROOF of their BULLcrap OF CLAIMING 300 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!

PRODUCE 300 WINNING CASE NUMBERS OR ADMIT THAT IT IS THE 2 OF YOU, JACK & MARGY FLYNN WHO ARE THE SLANDERERS, LIARS AND BULLcrapers!!!

PUT UP OR SHUT UP!!!

Producing PROOF of 30 of their own WINS or PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS shouldn't be too hard to produce if they have really WON 300 CASES or 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, RIGHT???

If they provide PROOF of WINNING 30 CASES of their own or an alleged 30 ASSOCIATED WINS, I will order CERTIFIED COPIES OF ALL 30 CASES and I will order copies of all the briefings in 3 cases at random and give them my thumbs up approval and recommendation "if" I find that their legal pleadings are COMPETENT!

However, my personal opinion is that they can't produce any PROOF that they have WON even 1% of 300 WINS which is only THREE (3) CASES on anything more important than a CIVIL INFRACTION WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!

Please provide 1% of 300 WINNING CASE NUMBERS which is a GRAND TOTAL of a MERE THREE (3) here:

1.) Case No. ____________? 1.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

2.) Case No. ____________? 2.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

3.) Case No. ____________? 3.) Associated Win Case No. ________________?

(CIVIL INFRACTIONS WHICH ARE "TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS" DO NOT COUNT!)

TOM HYLAND in NEW MEXICO allegedly WINNING a case of No Driver License, No Insurance, No Registration or Expired Registration WHICH ARE ALL CIVIL INFRACTIONS ARE LIKEWISE "TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS."

The so called METRIS CASE is a CIVIL CASE where it is TEN TIMES easier if NOT a 100 TIMES EASIER to WIN than any CRIMINAL CASE, because in the Civil Law you are either right or wrong and it’s strictly a statutory or court rule requirement which can be dismissed for something as trivial as failure to give proper service of both the summons and complaint, failure to file a proof of service, failure to appear or the statutes of limitation have expired or something else trivial like that!!!

However, a closer look at the FACTS clearly show that the ONLY WINS that these 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS ever got was in their own PHONY COMMON LAW COURT that they convened in a HOTEL ROOM, HA, HA, HA, WHAT A JOKE THESE 2 FALSE ADVERTISERS CLEARLY ARE!!!

ME, I AM WINNING SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES WHERE THE CLIENTS ARE CLEARLY GUILTY SUCH AS:

1.) DRUNK DRIVERS WHO ARE DRIVING DRUNK - AND SOME BLEW MORE THAN TWICE OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT.

2.) Guys growing more than 166 'pot' plants is obviously more than any competent attorney could ever hope to argue in front of any jury was only for personal use or is THE ULTIMATE USER!!!

Hey, I LOSE some cases here and there, but then if they were clearly DRUNK, they were clearly GUILTY weren't they, and therefore, since I am NOT responsible for anybody getting drunk and then getting behind the wheel, they can't honestly or truthfully say that I LOST their case - can they???

I TELL EVERYONE ABOUT MY LOSSES AS WELL AS MY WINS AT ALL OF MY SEMINARS!!!

Now if Jack and Margy Flynn attempt to make any false claims that there is NO CASE NUMBER because the case was dismissed, I can easily disprove that bogus excuse.

You can call any Court Clerk in any city or county in any State at either the Municipal, District or Superior Court level and EVERY Court Clerk in EVERY COURT will tell you that if you were ever charged with any offense, whether it be a civil infraction such as speeding or running a red light or with a more serious offense such as DUI, Driving While License Suspended, Assault, Domestic Violence, Drug Possession, etc., that they have a record of it and they just need you to give them the Case Number which is printed in the upper right hand corner of the citation or ticket that was issued to you by the arresting officer. – JUST SIMPLY DEMAND THEY PROVIDE YOU THE CASE NUMBER AND THE NAME OF THE COURT SO YOU CAN CALL THE COURT CLERK UP YOURSELF!

If Jack and Margy Flynn attempt to tell you that you can't get any PROOF that the case was dismissed because the court allegedly SEALED the case, I can easily disprove that bogus excuse also.

You can call any Court Clerk in any city or county in any State at either the Municipal, District or Superior Court level and EVERY Court Clerk in EVERY COURT will tell you that even if a Case was ordered to be SEALED, that they could still sell you a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT which would show or reflect that the case really was SEALED if you just provide them the Case Number which is printed in the upper right hand corner of the citation or ticket that was issued to you by the arresting officer.

When a case is SEALED, all that means is that you will not be able to get copies of the WINNING BRIEFS!!!

However you still will be able to get a CERTIFIED COPY of the COURT DOCKET or CASE REPORT even if a case was actually SEALED.

If they tell you otherwise, just simply demand that they tell you the name of the court and the Case Number and call the Court Clerk and ask the Court Clerk yourself and they will tell you that I am correct and that they are BS.

I believe that anyone who claims to have WON 300 CASES or an alleged 300 ASSOCIATED WINS would have absolutely no problem providing us with PROOF by providing us 300 CASE NUMBERS whether it’s their WIN or 300 ASSOCIATED WINS, don't you???

How about 30 CASE NUMBERS??? – THAT IS A MERE 10% of what they CLAIMED!!!

How about 3 CASE NUMBERS??? – THAT IS ONLY 1% of what they CLAIMED!!!

This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce any PROOF of 30 ASSOCIATED WINS!!!

This pair of BULLcrapers JACK & MARGY FLYNN can't even produce any PROOF of 3 ASSOCIATED WINS of anything more important than a speeding ticket, running a red light or a parking ticket, ALL of which are CIVIL INFRACTIONS WHICH ARE TRIX WHICH ARE FOR KIDS!!!

MY BOOTS AIN'T TALL ENOUGH!!!

BARNUM AND BAILEY SAID THERE’S A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE!

Anybody who believes someone’s claim of WINNING 300 CASES or an alleged 300 ASSOCIATED WINS at face value without checking into their credentials and NOT seeing any PROOF of WINNING EVEN 10% or 30 WINS of an alleged 300 WINS is THE SUCKER THAT BARNUM AND BAILEY WAS TALKING ABOUT!

Sincerely

Luis Ewing

CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a) and (b). and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my "consent" for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent responsible to deliver it to the Sender, please destroy the e-mail after advising by reply that you erroneously received this e-mail. The receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or "of-counsel client privilege," nor will it constitute a waiver of the "work-product doctrine." Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express prior "written consent" is liable for civil monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free "only" to those specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing list, please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing, 1911 S.W. Campus Drive, #118, Federal Way, Wash. 98023 or call and leave a message with your e-mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!

--
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741
Email 1: rcwcodebuster@comcast.net or
Email 2: rcwcodebuster@yahoo.com or
Email 3: rcwcodebuster@gmail.com or
Email 4: rcwcodebuster@hotmail.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release Date: 8/5/2008 6:03 AM


Received comments:
Thanks for the feedback Margy.  
 
It has been said: That a claim without evidence -- makes as little sense -- as a defense without evidence.  What do you think? True or False  
 
Either amounts to "name calling", and would you agree -- that the world would be a better place if only children invested their precious time (lives) in such experiences.
 
Just an thought and an Idea:
  • Would it not serve you and Jack well to do what some have done?  That is, post your wins on your website -- and link each one (where possible), to the case where it is stored in the public records (via the internet).  
  • A simple 3 column matrix showing WINS, Losses and Draws -- with a link to each case, being the actually place holder for each Win, loss or draw would be very visual and easy to understand and use to dig deeper to learn more. 
Such an endeavor would take a day or two to construct -- however it could also save you and Jack many hours, days and more dealing with such information as presented below.  IF you put such a matrix on your website, it would enable you to send the URL to that webpage to anyone who claims: "WATCH OUT FOR 300 WINS FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN".
 
Looking forward to see you both this week-end.
 

Good Friends are like Good Mirrors!  They provide reflections that you may have not seen before.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: WATCH OUT FOR 300 WINS FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN AS NEITHER 1 OF THEM HAS EVEN WON EVEN JUST 1 SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE!!!! -- THEY CAN'T EVEN PROVE 10% OR 30 WINS, THEY CAN'T EVEN PROVE 1% OR JUST 3 WINS!!!! WHAT A JOKE
Doug,
 
Luis Ewing is mentally disturbed, a liar and has been spreading libelous crap about us for a long time.  Those who know him say he is full of it and that he has taken big bucks from people and given them mostly nothing in return.  We have tried to tell him, politely, then not so politely to knock off this b.s., but as you can see, he continues.  We may have to get very ruthless with him, if he does not stop his lies.  We have challenged him to discuss his issues with us, and he never has.  Other coordinators have invited him to come and do so, and he never has.  The guy is wacked!  I will try to dig up an email that a fellow sent me after receiving some crap about us.  It may put Ewing into a clearer light for you and for the people he has bothered with his lies. 
 
Best regards,
 
Margy

--- OnWed, 8/6/08, TheLawStudyGroup@togetherworks.com<TheLawStudyGroup@togetherworks.com> wrote:
From: TheLawStudyGroup@togetherworks.com <TheLawStudyGroup@togetherworks.com>
Subject: Fw: WATCH OUT FOR 300 WINS FALSE ADVERTISERS JACK & MARGY FLYNN AS NEITHER 1 OF THEM HAS EVEN WON EVEN JUST 1 SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASE OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE!!!! -- THEY CAN'T EVEN PROVE 10% OR 30 WINS, THEY CAN'T EVEN PROVE 1% OR JUST 3 WINS!!!! WHAT A JOKE
To: "ItsMe" <ItsMe@TogetherWorks.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 9:02 PM

 
Jack and Margy,
 
Robert is on my list and when he got your flyer that I sent to my list today.... this is what he sent back?
 
Looks like it came originally from Luis Ewing.
 
Any feedback?

Citizens of the American Constitution
c/o 739 Dalbey Drive
Las Vegas, New Mexico
Web site: www.CitizensoftheAmericanConstitution.org
E-mail: Constitutionalcitizens@yahoo,com or takebackourrights@yahoo.com


(505) 425 - 0659

NEWSLETTER – August 22, 2008

Throughout the history of human existence upon this planet, there have been those who have sought truth and those who opposed it, many times, violently. In percentage to the overall population of any or all given areas, the former were slight in number. The latter were large in number. The curious who sought truth were interested not only in its discovery, but also in the reality and meaning of existence, and of life, itself. Those who opposed it had no interest in these matters, protected their own vested interests, or those of their masters, that of the established status quo, and usually had dull, limited, small minds, unconcerned for truth, reality, discovery, creativity or justice. Those same people types have always been and are still with us, today, but, contrary to the popular belief of many people, the former have decreased in number and the latter have increased. All that is needed to verify this is to look at our present governments, society and so-called civilization. That says it all. Again, talk is cheap. Actions speak loudly, and very few American Citizens take effective action to protect and advance their own Rights and those of their own children and grandchildren and adhere to the founding principles of this Nation. Again, many speak, but, sadly, few act. We offer our thanks and congratulations to those few who take action and try to make a difference.

As many of you know, for the past three years, Margy and I have presented many seminars, workshops and lectures all over this nation and numerous radio broadcasts, based in the Constitution and how Citizens, by and through their own efforts, can apply it to correct numerous wrongs and make lasting changes in their own communities. As many of you also know, the vast majority of the patriotic community, various patriotic groups and individuals dealing in these issues are based in commercial law, commercial bonds, U.C.C., sovereignty or other related issues, and not in the Constitution. Since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land and the highest authority in the land, one would think that the vast majority of professed Patriots would be based in the Supreme Law. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

It is worthy of note, that from the very beginning of this Nation, the seeds of opposition to the Constitution and the Rights of the People were planted and have been germinating ever since, so that, for many years, we have had an unconstitutional neo-fascist, nazi government, unconcerned about truth, honor, justice, and with absolute disdain and contempt for the Rights and well being of the People, although those in power publicly give lip service to their concern for the People. Again, words mean nothing. Actions mean everything, and we have no idea when American society is going to figure this out. Who, among you, truly aware of the reality of America, at this time, would disagree with these statements? You, dear reader, are an individual within this society, who, by your reading this newsletter, has already ascertained the truth, or you would not be reading this document. Thus, you are well aware that government has no respect for the People, because the People have not commanded or demanded that respect, and instead, abdicated their responsibility, as good Citizens, to oversee the actions of government, and long ago surrendered their inherent political power to government, which has ruthlessly used it against them ever since.

Whenever governments set up programs, which they intend to impose upon the People, in most cases, contrary to the People’s Rights and in opposition to Constitutional mandates imposed upon government, they usually set up the “opposition” to those programs. By doing this, both the programs and their “oppositions” are controlled by the same vested interest parties, who use and insert agents, shills, provocateurs and their minions everywhere. Methods which appear to be offered to Citizens to oppose government programs, in many cases, are actually calculated to aid and abet those programs designed by government, with a planned, premeditated actuarial outcome. What better way to take Patriots off point than to establish and promulgate methods that are not Constitutionally based, and, for the most part, prove to be very ineffective before government and the courts? Many well meaning and well intentioned Patriots who use these commercial and other methods may sincerely and truly believe that they are employing correct methods to challenge the wrongdoing of governments, but how effective are they to that purpose?

If we use the tools provided to us by the very systems we are attempting to challenge, that seems self-defeating, places us in their camp and a disastrous outcome is almost certain, with a few exceptions to make it look good. Further, the covert commercial/corporate nature of government was imposed upon the People of this country in secrecy and fraud, taking full advantage of the fact that most working folks were not very knowledgeable about how governments are Constitutionally mandated to operate or about their own unlimited, unalienable Rights affirmed and protected in the Constitutions. To us, using the methods of commerce and admiralty, gives credibility and legitimacy to these fraudulently imposed systems, and makes the user part of the fraud! Using the Supreme Law of the Land is a far better way to oppose wrongful actions of government officers, who, pursuant to their oaths, and Constitutional mandates imposed upon them by their oaths, have perjured those oaths, denied Rights guaranteed in the Constitutions and, by their own actions, have stepped outside the scope of their lawful duties and authority. In short, they are CRIMINALS, acting in sedition and insurrection to the Supreme Law of America, and should be treated as such, and not honored by the American People, exonerated for their actions and held above the law.                             

When Citizens and groups began asking us to present seminars, most attendees were commercially or otherwise based, but they appeared in large numbers. Most of them told us that they were unfamiliar with the Constitution, had never read it, or did so with a glance, and had never even considered it for any application. However, after the seminars, most attendees told us that they now had a great understanding of the Constitution and how the Supreme Law could be applied to stop governments’ constant attacks on the Peoples’ Rights and protections guaranteed in the Constitution. A grass roots Constitutional movement began to appear in America, numerous groups began requesting seminars and we constantly appeared on radio. To some elements, vested interests and control forces in this Nation, this is dangerous. The truth of the Constitution, which is a very small, but concise document, to the point, direct and simple, in the hands of the People, who would use it to enforce their Rights guaranteed therein, and LIMIT the power governments have to infringe upon those Rights, would be a disaster to the established status-quo, if that movement grew. Most of us know that those who control world societies control America and its Citizens. Many people who have begun to understand this fact realize that the control exerted by vested interests upon America is widespread and virtually everywhere. Control of society in ALL aspects is imperative for the controllers, and no valid truth and freedom movement based in the Constitution can be allowed to flourish and gain momentum to challenge their solidly entrenched and well financed heavily vested interests.

As has been true throughout human history, those who wanted to stop the message of truth, and its messengers, began to appear, nearly immediately. Within eighteen, or fewer, months from our first presentations, other detractors and antagonists joined the smear campaign, and then their numbers and attacks upon us and the Constitutional methods began to increase, rapidly. We did not want to create a controversy by defending ourselves and taking us and others away from our focus. On several occasions, we attempted to reach the main attacker, directly, as did many of our seminar coordinators, to resolve the program. He was not interested, and simply continued the attacks. These attacks have been mean-spirited, wide-spread assaults, apparently intended to stop the Constitutional methods being disseminated and prevent Citizens from requesting and attending our seminars. While Citizens who attended our seminars have supported us by their own appraisals of the seminars, the attacks have been directed at our potential seminar attendees, have been relentless, and have definitely damaged attendance, to the extent that we may be, regrettably, unable to continue the seminars.                   

If this happens, then our Constitutional message and methods cease, and evil, again, has triumphed. A great man once said that this is an evil world in which to live, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who do nothing about it. We cannot tell you that the attackers represent those who want to stop the Constitutional message, but that certainly appears to be their intent. Attendees who know the main attacker, a fellow named Luis Ewing, have said that his interest, by his actions, may be to stop our methods, because he considers himself to be in competition with us. We are in competition with no one and have constantly said that if someone else’s methods work effectively, then, by all means, they should be used, because they are reaching their mark. For those of you interested in knowing more about this man, we have attached an email exchange between a fellow who received Ewing’s email attacks on us, and me (Margy), who wanted us to know more about Ewing’s character. I used the link,
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/323/RipOff0323954.htm, given in the beginning of the last email, presented below, and was very dismayed to read the story told there. As avowed Constitutionalists, we always say that you should make up your own mind, so if you wish to do this about Ewing, please read the email exchange and then click on the referenced link.  

All our lives, Margy and I have been doing something about evil, and this is not the first time evil, or those who serve evil, have attempted to stop us. We have no intention of stopping, but if the People are so influenced by opponents to the Constitutions and to our Constitutionally-based methods, then the People, themselves, have been manipulated by forces that oppose their own Rights and the intended covert destruction of this Nation. If you, the reader, have attended one or more of our seminars, and if you feel that our presentation benefited you, increased your understanding of the power of the Constitution and perhaps inspired you to stand up for your Rights secured therein, we now ask you to help us continue this work. We ask that you write your own testimonial, either short or long, of your opinion of the seminar and your experience with us, and send it out to everyone on your email list, and ask them to forward it to their email lists. The emails against us have been dispersed throughout the Internet, so if enough former attendees send out their own testimonials in support of us, these may reach the mark and demonstrate to potential attendees, from personal experience, who and what we are, what our Constitutionally based methods can do, and our intention of restoring Constitutional governance to America, one community at a time.

One of the constant attacks against us is that we cannot demonstrate over 300 wins in the past nine years. Margy and I have been involved with the Constitution since the age of 14, which was long ago. When we began this in New Mexico, over nine years ago, we had no idea that we would be presenting seminars all over the country, and if we had, we would have kept records of those wins. The wins are group wins, and we were not concerned with retaining paperwork, but rather with using Constitutional methods to win the cases, and keeping a count of the wins, for our own knowledge. Some members of our New Mexico groups do not want to be known publicly. In the seminars, we pass out about a dozen orders from cases demonstrating wins, pertaining to Margy and to people who gave us permission to do so. The Constitutional methods we used are what obtained the wins, and none of the detractors have criticized those methods – just us.

Those of you willing to write testimonials by e-mail could briefly introduce the e-mail by the following language, or by some other introduction you choose:

“ I, (We), attended Jack and Margy Flynn’s seminar in (location and date, if you wish), and my (our) following testimonial is offered in support of what they are attempting to establish in America, for the benefit of the People and restoration of Constitutional governance to this great Nation, in keeping with its founding principles”

We ask you to send this out to all those in your e-mail list, and ask them to send it to their e-mail lists, and to your fellow seminar attendees, if you can. If you think that our work for the Constitution and for the People of America is important, then we ask and encourage those who feel this way to help us to continue our work. America and the future of her People are too important to let anyone or anything stop the dissemination of the very information which can help take her and our collective future back to the true founding principles of this Nation. Please send us a copy of your testimonial, and you can also send it to the following detractors. Thank you very much for your help and for your support for America and her Constitution.

Best regards,

Jack and Margy

For Your Information:

Luis Ewing, the main attacker, who has made numerous vicious, false statements which he cannot support, and threatened to shut down our Internet activities. In fact, the jackmargyflynn@yahoo.com was shut down by Yahoo for a time, but when we explained the situation, Yahoo restored our email account and apologized for their actions. Ewing sent out hundreds, if not thousands, of attack emails about us prior to our recent Texas trip, where we expected, from all reports, which had come to us, to speak before hundreds of concerned Citizens. The actual attendance in both seminars was the lowest we have ever had, in one of the allegedly most patriotic states in this country. Obviously, Ewing’s hate filled emails accomplished his objective.

Ewing’s e-mail is: rcwcodebuster@comcast.net

John Roland, a self-professed Constitutionalist, wanted to “vet” us and criticize us for our alleged errors, but who would never specify any of these so-called errors to us in writing, as we requested of him. He showed up at the Austin seminar with a hidden tape recorder and when our coordinator did not let him in, because of Roland’s reputation as a provocateur and disrupter at other events, Roland taped the coordinator’s remarks and sent our an email attacking the coordinator and complaining about us. This is not how true Constitutionalists and Patriots conduct themselves, and we were very disappointed by Roland’s actions.

Roland’s e-mail is: jon@jonroland.org

The following e-mails pertain to Louis Ewing.

This email was sent to our constitutionalcitizens@yahoo.com  email address, regarding Ewing, and resulted in the email exchange included below:

Re:Luis Ewing on who to avoid

ifreemantoo <ifreemantoo@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 22:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: ifreemantoo <ifreemantoo@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re:Luis Ewing on who to avoid
To: tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com

It has been my habit only to monitor Tips and Tricks. It is as I wrote Barry that I would only do so. However, it seems that some outrageous statements without supporting evidence are accepted as factual that bothers me. Also, the unsubstantiated inflammatory labels on the characters of people bothers me. So I break my habit today.

While side commentary was made in some instances to correct perception or truth there was none regarding the conclusions made by Luis Ewing about the Flynn's.

Mr. Ewing's inflammatory statement here seems to be taken at face value for the words he used.

"There are others who are just as INSIGNIFICANT, but these INCOMPETENTS have caused more damage and more patriots to go to jail than any others."

If this statement is true about the Flynns and the group, Citizens of the American Constitution, where is the proof or complaints about them or their group? Who has gone to jail as a result of listening and paying attention to Jack and Margy?

Not even Quackloose (this is an intentional misspelling) has a thing to say about the Flynns or their group; anymore than Quackloose has a thing to say about Legal Bears. If people are going to jail or have been hurt by patriot guru's, Quackloose will be there to share and scare. A Google search using the term "Citizens of the American Constitution" only produced 5 pages of boredom with nothing remarkable from a surface view of each caption heading.

I did a history check here on posts about the Flynns. I've not been able to see anything negative posted about them. It seems FrogFarmer in post #12915 bought a piece of literature from them. I don't know what FF concludes from this literature. Barry I think responded to a call for help for >Daniel Loeffle at post #10999which was a response to an email forwarded by Jim Steiner from Margy Flynn. I don't get the attack or the acceptance Mr. Ewing's attack on the Flynns.

I do believe that Lewis Ewing is very clever but not always very accurate and over exaggerates. If he can challenge the Flynn's to produce 300 wins then I challenge Lewis Ewing to produce names of those in jail or those who have suffered harm as a result of the Flynn's methods or beliefs? Perhaps Mr. Ewing had a big buzz going on when he wrote this.

Never-the-less it bothers me to see supported such statements without any proof that cause reputations to be smeared. What kind of scripture supports accusations (really Ewing is judge and jury) of this nature?

Creature of the Creator
Michael Powers
Discoverer of self-evident truth
Not a creature born of man's legalized plunder

John Adams <constitutionalcitizens@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear Michael,

Thank you for sending this email.  Luis Ewing has made numerous unfounded, libelous attacks on my husband, Jack, and me.  We have challenged him to prove his false allegations, but he never does, because he cannot. 

There is absolutely NO TRUTH to any of the malicious statements he has made about us, and we have reason to believe that he may have made a false report of spam against us to yahoo, which disabled our jackmargyflynn email account, without even verifying anything with us.  Ewing even threatened to report us to the attorney general as frauds.  What kind of "patriot" would do such a thing.  In fact, what kind of man would?

Luis Ewing is a petty, mean-spirited individual, whose vicious lies have harmed us and many others who are trying to help their fellow Citizens and this nation.  I was informed by someone who knew him well that he actually took someone else's material then sold it to a woman, who ended up in trouble and would not help her out.  This guy is a creep and likely a disinformation specialist who may, for all anyone knows, be working for "the man".

As for the 5 pages of boredom to which you refer, I cannot comment, because I do not know to what you are referring.  Perhaps what is boring to you may be interesting to others???

Jack and I appreciate your objectivity and your comments.

Best regards,
Margy Flynn
Citizens of the American Constitution

Saturday, May 31, 2008 9:11 AM

From:

"ifreemantoo" <ifreemantoo@yahoo.com>

View contact details

To:

"John Adams" constitutionalcitizens@yahoo.com

Margy,
Boredom means in context of looking at negatives about you and Jack in a search on Google which produced none. Perhaps I should have used unremarkable instead. However, you should be happy to read this report about Luis Ewing.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/323/RipOff0323954.htm

I'm sad to say that I'm having a "legal" discussion with Barry Smith regarding Barry's endorsement of Luis Ewing and Ewing's general mis-characterizations of you and Jack. He at least posted the above link.

Like most people caught in an error or lie, I think Barry is posturing to save face. Barry likewise is using super-spirituality legalism to justify his actions, however he won't address the self-evident fact, that there were no facts presented by Luis about both of you to support Luis's outrageous contentions.

Here is another point that is hard for Barry to escape. Not that there is truth to this, but what if everything Luis said about the both of you were true? Well, Barry is catching a lot of flack from his members because Ewing has caused much polarization. Nobody wants to really hear it. I know I don't; most likely I would believe the opposite of whatever Ewing wrote or said.

I'm still working on Barry and he's starting to crack. He does have much success in what he is doing. However, just like anyone with a bit of power, they should be somewhat mistrusted because they are human.

Creature of the Creator
Michael Powers
Discoverer of self-evident truth
Not a creature born of man's legalized plunder



NOTICE: Luis Ewing, Jack and Margy Flynn, and other presented entities are not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.
Share/Save/Bookmark Subscribe

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related itemsBelligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
GraphicsHistory
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel relatedTruth
 Video
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!


Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.

Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.

Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.


Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2010
All Rights Reserved

H O M E