Making checks a non-taxable event.
This is all based upon what is lawful money of value and HJR-192 (House Joint Resolution-192, June 5, 1933), that none is in circulation for private use by the public.
There are no lawful dollars out there only credit and debt ledger entrees, and no one gets paid for anything with anything of valuable substance.
The IRS can't tax credit, debt, or barter.
The Congress licensed the use of Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) to be used as money, as a medium or exchange for discharge of public and private debt into the US bankruptcy. At that point FRNs became contraband and that gives the BATF and the IRS jurisdiction over its use and transfer. Just like trafficking in alcohol, guns, drugs, or tobacco , or other substances subject to excise taxes.
There are many types of commercial paper that properly prepared can discharge debt other than FRNs but few know how to use them. Using FRNs is licensed money laundering, plain and simple. When I get a check, it says "dollars" on the front. If I endorse it openly, I just testified I received dollars of valuable substance, even though there are none.
I just corrected the error on the front and converted the check into a bill of exchange. In other words: a barter transaction of two different kinds of things being traded even-up for equal value are not taxable, there was no sale or financial gain just a private trade.
So, brokenwrench has cut a Gordian knot with a pen, instead of a sword. If you wish to use such a sharp pen, you would do well to read the article below, and if that doesn't lead you to study further then you don't understand enough about the honing and care of a good blade...start over with a study of the life of The Master who told his disciples to sell their cloaks to buy a sword and intervened when Peter used his: Exhaust administrative remedy, first! Ignorance is curable.
WHAT TO PRESENT ADMINISTRATIVELY THAT YOU HAVE NO INCOME.
Here is a observation that no one realizes or even knows it exists. Here is a problem that may be brought before a court it you are drug into one. But it is better used administratively. Just a hypotheses. Could it work? Who knows.
(1) You work for a company
So now let’s put on your thinking caps and do some digging starting with
TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART VI > § 165
§ 165. Losses
(a) General rule
(g) Worthless securities
(2) Security defined
Ok so now you have been given "evidences of debt" for your work. You have never made "income" but received evidences of debt. The US Treasury admits to (g) above in its website http://www.ustreas.gov/education/faq/currency/legal-tender.shtml wherein the website states,
Federal Reserve notes are legal tender currency notes. The twelve Federal Reserve Banks issue them into circulation pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. A commercial bank belonging to the Federal Reserve System can obtain Federal Reserve notes from the Federal Reserve Bank in its district whenever it wishes. It must pay for them in full, dollar for dollar, by drawing down its account with its district Federal Reserve Bank.
Federal Reserve Banks obtain the notes from our Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). It pays the BEP for the cost of producing the notes, which then become liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks, and obligations of the United States Government.
Congress has specified that a Federal Reserve Bank must hold collateral equal in value to the Federal Reserve notes that the Bank receives. This collateral is chiefly gold certificates and United States securities. This provides backing for the note issue. The idea was that if the Congress dissolved the Federal Reserve System, the United States would take over the notes (liabilities). This would meet the requirements of Section 411, but the government would also take over the assets, which would be of equal value. Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them.
Federal Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, silver or any other commodity, and receive no backing by anything This has been the case since 1933. The notes have no value for themselves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are legal tender, Federal Reserve notes are "backed" by all the goods and services in the economy.
Now they, not you, have established that their confidence game, what you received in exchange for the company draft (check) was absolutely nothing. They are valueless so you exchanged your labor for valueless paper that has a lien on it already. They are identified in two statutes (Code) and they are Title 18 Section 8 where in it states
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 8 Release date: 2004-08-06
§ 8. Obligation or other security of the United States defined
The term "obligation or other security of the United States" includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons, United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress, and canceled United States stamps.
And the second statute (Code) is
Federal reserve notes,
to be issued at the discretion of the
Phrase ''hereinafter set forth'' is from section 16 of the
Section is comprised of first par. of section 16 of act
1934 - Act Jan. 30, 1934, struck out from
last sentence provision
CHANGE OF NAME
Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed
name of Federal
Gold coinage discontinued,
see section 5112 of Title 31, Money
Since there is no more real "money" to be redeemed then as the Treasury Web Site stated they are worthless in conformity with 26 USC 165 (g). Ergo you cannot go into and bank and demand gold or silver coin for a federal reserve note.
So the question is, Have I received any income that is reportable for filing a tax form? Have I objected openly that I do not accept federal reserve notes as "payment" for my labor? See the PadleFord case 14 Ga. 438 wherein they stated,
"Supposing this not to
be taxed for inspection purposes, has Congress consented to it being laid?
It is certain that Congress has not expressly consented. But is express
consent necessary? There is nothing in the Constitution which says so. There
is nothing in the practice of men, or in the Municipal Law of men, or in
the practice of nations, or the Law of nations that says so. Silence
gives consent, is the rule of business life.
Has the company caused a theft when issuing
you a draft that only will result in you receiving evidences of debt that are
no longer "at Par" with a face value US Silver Eagle dollar denominated
coin? This is what the court stated on this type money issue,
Bank notes are the representative of money, and circulate as such, only by the general consent and usage of the community. But this consent and usage are based upon the convertibility of such notes into coin, at the pleasure of the holder, upon their presentation to the bank for redemption. This is the vital principle which sustains their character as money. So long as they are in fact what they purport to be, payable on demand, common consent gives them the ordinary attributes of money. But upon failure of the bank by which they are issued, when its doors are closed, and its inability to redeem its bills is openly avowed [See Letter, Oct. 26, 1989, Dept. of Treasury, Russell Munk, Asst. Gen. Council, (International Affairs) as recorded in the Office of the Clerk & Recorder, Bacca County, colorado, admitting the notes are worthless and not redeemable at par.], they instantly lose the character of money, their circulation as currency ceases with the usage and consent upon which it rested, and the notes become the mere dishonored and depreciated evidences of debt . . . It is only upon this idea that they can honestly be tendered as money, and when accepted as such, under the same supposition, the mutual mistake of facts should no more be permitted to benefit one party, or prejudice the other, than if the notes had been spurious, or payment had been made in base or adulterated coin."
Again the question begs of any court what the last sentence in that you have never received any income in "money", but evidences of a debt issued with a lien already on it thereby taking them out of the realm of money as they are a debt obligation or in reality an I.O. U. issued by a private banking system that are trademarked as such.
Want more statutes and code on the matter for you to decide? Here is more info that is incontrovertible?
So with your question in mind as to what statutes
say in regard to federal reserve
TITLE 31 > SUBTITLE IV > CHAPTER 51 > SUBCHAPTER II >
Sec. 5119. - redemption and cancellation of currency
(a) Except to the extent authorized in regulations the Secretary of the Treasury prescribes with the approval of the President, the Secretary may not redeem United States currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) in gold. However, the Secretary shall redeem gold certificates owned by the Federal reserve banks at times and in amounts the Secretary decides are necessary to maintain the equal purchasing power of each kind of United States currency. When redemption in gold is authorized, the redemption may be made only in gold bullion bearing the stamp of a United States mint or assay office in an amount equal at the time of redemption to the currency presented fo redemption.
COMMENT. As stated in the CODE, in red above, it can be taken as not being U.S currency like you say, until you read all the statutes and the words "IN KIND". Then the worthless note IS taken as currency by the government. True, it is not a pay to, but only a legal offer (tender). That's all they care about is a legal offer. You can decline a legal offer even if in federal reserve notes as stated on the US Treasury web site. Go back and read all of it if you have to.
(b) (1) Except as provided in subsection (c)(1) of this
(A) gold certificates issued before January 30, 1934.
(B) silver certificates.
(C) notes issued under the
Act of July 14, 1890 (ch.
(D) Federal Reserve notes for which payment was made under section 4 of the Old Series Currency Adjustment Act.
(E) United States currency notes, including those issued under section 1 of the Act of February 25, 1862 (ch. 33, 12 Stat. 345), the Act of July 11, 1862 (ch. 142, 12 Stat. 532), the resolution of January 17, 1863 (P.R. 9; 12 Stat. 822), section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1863 (ch. 73, 12 Stat. 710), or section 5115 of this title.
(2) redemption, cancellation, and destruction of currency. -
The Secretary shall -
(A) redeem any currency described in paragraph (1) from the general fund of the Treasury upon presentment to the Secretary; and
(B) cancel and destroy such currency upon redemption.
The Secretary shall not be required to reissue United States currency notes upon redemption.
(c) (1) The Secretary may determine the amount of the following United States currency that will not be presented for redemption because the currency has been destroyed or irretrievably lost:
(A) circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks issued before July 1, 1929, for which the United States Government has assumed liability.
COMMENT. Does this mean that the notes are no longer assumed by the United States? Kinda presumes they are assumed by the IMF/fed. Res. that issues them as first liens on the U.S., huh?
(B) outstanding currency referred to in subsection (b)(1) of this section.
(2) When the Secretary makes a determination under this subsection, the Secretary shall reduce the amount of that currency outstanding by the amount the Secretary determines will not be redeemed and credit the appropriate receipt account.
(d) To provide a historical collection of United States currency, the Secretary may withhold from cancellation and destruction and transfer to a special account one piece of each design, issue, or series of each denomination of each kind of currency (including circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) after redemption. The Secretary may make appropriate entries in Treasury accounts because of the transfers
Here are the actual statutes on the above that you wanted.
Notes on Sec. 5119.
Historical and Revision Notes Revised Section
5119(a) 31:408a(less last proviso). 31:444(1st sentence words between 2d and 3d semicolons). 31:822b. Jan. 30, 1934, ch. 6, Sec. 6(less last proviso), 11, 15(1st sentence words between 2d and 3d semicolons), 48 Stat. 340, 342, 344. 5119(b)(1) 31:405a-3. 31:911. 31:915(a), (b). June 24, 1967, Pub. L. 90-29, Sec. 1, 2, 81 Stat. 77. June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87-66, Sec. 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 75 Stat. 146, 147.
5119(b)(2) 31:404. 31:420. 31:914. 31:916. May 31, 1878, ch. 146, 20 Stat. 87; June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87-66, Sec. 7, 75 Stat. 47. R.S. Sec. 3580.
5119(c)(1) 31:915(c)(words before last comma).
5119(c)(2) 31:405a-2. 31:915(c)(words after last comma).
5119(d) 31:917. In subsection (a), the words ''Secretary may not redeem''
are substituted for
COMMENT. Can't be any plainer than this, right?
In subsection (b)(2), the words ''cancel and
destroy'' are substituted for
In subsection (c)(2), the words ''When the Secretary
makes a determination
In subsection (d), the word ''paper'' is omitted as
surplus. The words
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Act of July 14, 1890, ch. 708, 26
Stat. 289, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(C),
Section 4 of the Old Series Currency Adjustment
Act, referred to in subsec.
Acts February 25, 1862, July 11, 1862, and March
3, 1863, and resolution
Now let's go here
Sec. 5103. - Legal tender
United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts
Now here is something people do not know in the notes which
I will put in
TITLE 31 > SUBTITLE IV > CHAPTER 51 > SUBCHAPTER I > Sec. 5103.
Notes on Sec. 5103.
Historical and Revision Notes 1982 Act
Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large)
The words ''All . . . regardless
of when coined or issued'' are omitted as
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1983 AMENDMENT
Amendment effective Sept. 13, 1982, see section 2(i) of Pub. L. 97-452, set
SECTION REFERred TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
Now as to taxation of these "notes" and coin read this.
Sec. 5154. - State taxation
A State or a territory or possession of the United States may tax United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) as money on hand or on deposit in the same way and at the same rate that the State, territory, or possession taxes other forms of money. This section does not affect a law taxing national banks
Here are the statutes for the above and are you ready for this? Read on
Notes on Sec. 5154.
Historical and Revision Notes 1982 Act
Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large)
The words ''United States coins
and currency (including Federal reserve notes
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1983 AMENDMENT
Amendment effective Sept. 13, 1982, see section
2(i) of Pub. L. 97-452, set out as a note
So I think you have enough statutes you wanted to show that federal reserve notes, although worthless, ARE considered to be legal tender (offer) as currency of the United States. The key in all the above relies on that "restatement" of law. Best to get it and read what they had to say about currency and the worthless note.
Now, were you ever "paid" in "money" or evidences of debt? Is that reportable and income when there is no worth attached as stated in Title 26 USC 165 (g) and in the U.S. Treasury Web site quoted above plus all the other sources including the court cases? Would it not be feasible to bring this argument in the administrative forum rather than wait for your butt to be dragged into their court where you will never be allowed to present this as evidence? Better to get it on the administrative record as NOT your argument, but their proofs you have no income with which requires you to file any IRS form whatsoever. Says so right on your master file in a code that is theirs, not yours. After all you are hitting them with their own admissions. Never put -0- income on any 1040 or you will have defeated this plain proof that you have no reportable income.. Now you know why the IRS considers your labor value as -0- and anything above that is pure profit to you. Never thought of it that way did you? Well, when is the onslaught gonna happen? Don’t take my word for this, read it for yourself and draw your own conclusions from the very statutes I gave you here. This ought to really put the binders on them for a long time once you people see the truth they place before you every day.
Peace be with you
Copyright© 2005, 2008, 2010 H O M E
All Rights Reserved
Copyright© 2005, 2008, 2010
H O M E