Another pro-Government Pamphlet
The Riot Act
What’s Really Taking Place in a “Willful Failure to File” Trial Anyhow?
©2006 All Rights Reserved
Compilation, editing, footnotes,
distribution by the American: Patriot
2nd edition, 1st
The facts surrounding the information that you are about
to read stem from an immense fraud upon The People of our great nation long
In the late 1890's, a family that at that time ALREADY
had more than 6 generations experience in undermining various nations of
the world with National Debt, planned the creation of what was to become
the PRIVATELY OWNED, US Federal Reserve, Plans were made however, not just
for the Fed's FORMATION, but for its forced BANKRUPTCY. A forced
BANKRUPTCY as soon thereafter and that would be in alignment with other events*
this cunning group of thieves were orchestrating throughout the world. The
timing of the US FED bankruptcy was determined by powerful banking families,
the Rothschild (changed from Bauer) and Warburgs.* These two families
clandestinely sat, and appear to sit today, at the head of a World Congress
that came into existence in 1897.
1905 failed Russian
Revolution, 1914 WWI, and the 1917 successful Russian Revolution
"technical details" of the Federal Reserve Act is the work of Mr.
[Paul] Warburg more than any other man in the country... " (See Edwin Seligman, Proceedings of the Academy of
Political Science, Vol IV, No.4 (New York). Pp 3-6.) The Rockefeller and JP
Morgan family of the time were also very involved in the stealthy formation and
ownership of the US Federal Reserve. This author believes that the Morgan's no
longer have an active influence, However, while it is also believed that while
the Rockefeller family is closely involved and collects billions annually from
the proceeds, they are being duped by the majority owners: the Rothschild and
Warburg apparatus of the 21st century.
As incredulous as this may first appear, we have now
deciphered a chapter in a "Plan" that was first uncovered in Russia
circa 1902/03. (Actually first written in Russian, translated to English circa
1906.) A "chapter" of this heinous "Plan" speaks directly
to the formation of a nation's central bank; i.e. the US Federal Reserve, for
the sole purpose of rapidly forcing its bankruptcy and the subsequent hidden-from-view-takeover
of the attendant government.* Our tax laws were unlawfully adjusted by this
event, and we became subjects of a government we believed was created by our
In the Congressional
Record, 1934, Representative Louis T. McFadden states: There was no national
emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took office excepting the bankruptcy
of the Fed- a bankruptcy which has been going on under cover for several years
and which has been concealed from the people so that the people would continue
to permit their bank deposits and their bank reserves and their gold and the
funds of the United States Treasury to be impounded in these bankrupt
In 1930/34 McFadden was
Chairman of the House Currency and Finance Committee. Representative McFadden
at a banquet, in a very public way, shortly thereafter, was poisoned. This was
a warning to all those present that the subject matter was off limits
The PRIVATELY owned US Federal Reserve was enacted
by Congress on December 23rd, 1913. It, the "Fed" went belly-up in
1928. An event that has been withheld from the view of most of The People
of this great nation. (There is a reason for this deception.) In 1933, the
federal corporation known as the United States went into Receivership.
>From 1933 forward The People of our great nation were changed into subjects
(government's rationale makes us "customers") of what they still
believe today to be the government formed by their ancestors, The Founders.
(Pay close attention to the dates inasmuch as virtually all of what you read
can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt with certifiable written
The "Plan" referred to above is covered in great
detail in one of Mr. Riot's other pamphlets titled, "9/11, Why Did It
Happen?" as well as "Invisible Contracts".
The highly documented details, that you are about to read
are merely ONE of the many methods being used by the United States of
America to surreptitiously force the alleged voluntary collection of what
otherwise would be an unlawful (un-Constitutional) "Income" tax.
Additionally, it should be noted that the US Constitution created only one
principal of interest, the United States, NOT the United States
of America. Who is the plaintiff in all of these trials and where are the
organic documents that created the entity?
Besides the centerpiece that is routinely used by a
United States District Court* judge as shown in this brief Pamphlet, numerous
other methods are detailed by a retired Chief Clerk of the United States
District Court, Western District NY in the monumental 640 PLUS page work he
left to posterity.
* Read Mr. Riot's Pamphlet ---"Congress's
Private (dirty little secret) Courts.
WITH TWO FEDERAL CORPORATIONS*
AS THE "UNITED STATES"
STATES OF AMERICA*"
- One might not be a corporation. It might be a
"TRUST". A "TRUST" formed circa 1890's in one of the
"possessions" owned by the federal corporation known as the
"United States". Or as you'll soon see, the... "United
States Of America" may possibly be a hidden from-view 51st
State. You will not believe your own eyes. Research is ongoing.
- Did you know that the legal fiction known as the
"United States of America" is a substantially DIFFERENT
legal fiction than the "United States"? Did you know that the
ONLY "Principal of Interest" created in 48 separate and distinct
entries into the "United States Constitution" is the
"United States" and not the United States of America? (The Title
"Constitution of United States of America" was added later. It
created NOTHING.) What is the legal entity "United States of America"?
Where are the records demonstrating its' lawful (Constitutionally
mandated) existence? Is there more than one legal entity "United
States of America"? Who owns, not some, but 100% of the shares of the
United States of America? Especially the legal fiction whose name appears
on all of the currency issued by the Privately Owned US Federal Reserve.
Curiously, an entity of the same name United States of America is/became
the "Plaintiff" in all federal cases regards "Income"
taxes. Once again, is there more than one United States of America?
Table of Contents
Preface To The
Agreements Main Letter
Party Interference with a Contract
Story of Banking
Created Juristic Benefits
Enforcement of Commercial Interests
Read this (INVISIBLE CONTRACTS) book and find out what an angry Chief Clerk of the United States
District Court learned over his tenure. Find out why what happens in all of our
alleged federal courts... happens. Just whose name is on our debt-driven
bankruptcy laden alleged currency? Who really is the "Plaintiff' in our
alleged Federal Courts when the so-called government of the United States sues
or attacks US Citizens as alleged Defendants, Civil, Criminal or otherwise,
under the guise of the "United States of America"? Or is the United
States of America actually prosecuting suits against mere US citizens. God
bless George Mercier! It's unfortunate that he didn't know the complete truth.
Get the total story of how our nation was stolen. Stolen
by the owners of, and due to, their PREMEDITATED 1928 bankruptcy of the
PRIVATELY Owned US Federal Reserve. A hidden & forced bankruptcy of their
"Fed" causing the subsequent FORCED 1933 Receivership of The People's
federal corporation known as the "United States". Read "1913,
The Year THEY Stole America", By a disappointed American, Patrick Riot.
Publication date: later in 2006.
Let's Start With Some Basics...
I am not an attorney and this information while very
accurate, cannot be viewed as legal advice.
In fact you may be lucky and find a brave soul lawyer that
is willing to unmask these truths in a federal court. I believe that this will
be almost impossible inasmuch as most attorneys know full well that there are
certain "things" they cannot do on behalf of clients: this
is one. One of many and why you're usually screwed when counsel is
"appointed" or worse yet when you actually pay one to
"represent" your dumb "incompetent*" butt. (Rather
than "assist" as is referred to in the US Constitution.) Never you
mind though, inasmuch as you haven't a chance for relying on any Constitutional
protections in these PRIVATE Congressional Legislative courts.
* That's what the word "REPRESENT" means. You
are "incompetent" and a lawyer may make all decisions for you accordingly.
"ASSISTANCE" of counsel, as stated in the US Constitution, has a
totally different meaning and is nowhere to be seen today.
This is NOT the nation or the government originally
founded by our ancestors. Not since the Fed bankruptcy (1928) and the US
corporate Receivership (June 1933). When we go into court, the Plaintiff, that
we unwittingly believe to be our nation, actually is the United States of
America, which is discretely defined In Title 28 as state, appears to be now
owned lock-stock-and-barrel* by the Rothschild, Warburg &
Rockefeller/Morgan descendant apparatus. It's a game. But as you'll soon see...
a very serious game!
* Save one or two share for the federal corporation
known as the Constitutionally created "United States". This is where
we get screwed by ELECTING lawyers to MAKE our laws.
Sometimes defendants win cases by accident: i.e. Vernle
Kuglin or Joe Banister*. Just the same, most experienced lawyers know most of
this and they will not use the truth to set you free. Notice the same lawyers
turn up over and over again for "income" tax issues? It's an
"industry" and in my humble opinion, only a few have been
"sanctioned*" to be involved by the attendant powers in the
government: i.e. Becraft, Bernhoft, Dickstein etc.
* Not by the
court but by the system. Great way for a government mole to ingratiate himself,
keep an eye on what's going on, and make a good living; all the while being on
Taken directly from Chapter 3. "The Letter";
By the time you are reading this, the Judge may already
have taken some action on the government's petition for a restraining order or
whatever against you -- I cannot know the present status of your action, but
the information you need to know will be important to you either way the Judge rules.
If the restraining order has been granted, it can most likely be reversed next
January. Before I identify the Private Agreement you continue to
maintain with the Secretary of the Treasury (which agreement places you into a
written, equity relationship with the United States), there is a
fundamental principle underlying American jurisprudence you must be aware of as
background material to understand what follows. This principle is a hybrid
corollary and consistent extension of the evidentiary doctrine that specificity-in-evidence
will always overrule generalities-in-evidence, even when they are in
direct conflict with each other. For example, the statement by one witness
to a crime that...
"I saw a woman run around the corner, it
wasn't a man..." (and therefore the defendant, who is a man, isn't the
Actually Joe was very
innocent and his win may have been deliberate. When it came to
"sculpting" the evidence, I believe a "decision" was made
at a high level to cut him some slack. Nonetheless however, Joe was set-upon
for large sums of money (for his sanctioned attorneys) and has been thusly
warned to stay clear of the issue. Next time I don't believe he’ll get the same
slack. No, I don’t believe that Joe was even aware this arrangement took place.
I sincerely believe that the trial was essentially a theatre with elaborate
sets known only to the defense attorneys. They get the publicity, more
"Tax-Protesters" flock to their offices and they make tons of dough.
Perfect cover for issues believed to be so serious for the nation. Yes, yes and
another yes, I do believe certain attorneys have been chosen (sanctioned) by
the government to be moles within various groups for intelligence gathering
That statement would be overruled by this statement
from another witness…
"The person I saw run around the corner had
long hair, a beard, and something like a tattoo on his neck…"
Hence, conflicts in testimony are always resolved by
giving the greater weight to the most specific statements.
This is also the way equity grievances in CONTRACT
DISPUTES are settled, and that's what all "Income" tax
controversies in Federal Court are, CONTRACT DISPUTES. Duh!,
-- the most specific, detailed clause governing the disputed
circumstance is construed to be the statement meant to govern the disputed
circumstances -- even though broader more general statements can be found in
the contract (Title 26) and may favor the other party.
The principle that applies to your relationship with the
King (the King being the United States -- the Constitution being essentially a
renamed enactment of English Common Law as it was at THAT time, with only
additional restrainments being placed on the King) is the principle that PRIVATE
agreements will always overrule the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Thus, specific agreements governing individual circumstances will always
overrule broad general clauses found in the Constitution.
Or expressed in other words, it is irrational to
allow someone to enter into a private agreement with another, and then
allow him to take a clause out of another agreement, the Constitution
that was never mentioned in the original PRIVATE Agreement -- off point and out
of context -- and allow him to take that clause and use it to weasel, twist and
squirm his way out of the original agreement, all while retaining the financial
gain the original agreement gave him in the first place. This is irrational,
and judges won't allow it. They will also not voluntarily tell you that they are
looking at you through the PRIVATE agreement in question.
For example, let's say that I hired you to come work for
me as a computer design engineer for my computer company. When you started work
for me you and I signed a PRIVATE agreement agreeing that all company
information that you were exposed to while employed here, and all knowledge you
acquired regarding impending new products and technologies being worked on here
-- you had PRIVATELY agreed not to disclose, release or disseminate any such
confidential information to any other person for a five year period after you
left my employ for any reason. So let's say that you have now left my company,
and you violate our PRIVATE Agreement. You immediately start publishing and
disseminating information you learned while here to my competitors. Your excuse
for violating the agreement you signed earlier with me that...
"Well, the First Amendment says I got freedom
of speech and press..."
So now I take you in front of a judge and ask for a restraining
order. Question: Does the First Amendment apply? The answer is no, it doesn't. Restraining
order granted. Reason: Private agreements overrule the Bill of Rights.
In other words, one does not get to use the Bill of Rights to weasel out of
private agreements, while retaining the gain that the agreement gave him in the
first place. In the back of the judge's mind is the following logic:
"Well... you entered into an agreement with
this man to be an engineer for him, and under which you experienced financial
gain or profit. Now that you don't feel like honoring the PRIVATE agreement any
longer, you want to take a clause out of the Bill of Rights to work your way
out of your PRIVATE agreement with the other party, all the while keeping the
money he gave you under the PRIVATE agreement by working for him. This is
irrational. A Restraining Order will have to be granted."
If another example is this: Say that you are a convict
sitting in a prison. The warden calls you upstairs and offers to let you go
free if you sign an agreement, essentially a PRIVATE agreement. That agreement
calls for parole checking, warrant-less entry of your residence at any time,
and you agree not to carry any guns. You sign the PRIVATE Agreement and clear
out of prison. A month later your car is stopped for speeding and a gun is seen
half covered in the back seat. The officer charges you with possession of a
concealed weapon. You argue Second Amendment rights during pretrial motions.
The trial judge ignores your motions and sets a trial date. Question: Is the
judge a fifth column commie pinko? No, he isn't; he is merely enforcing
PRIVATE Agreements. Here you signed a PRIVATE Agreement and you experienced
a gain (premature freedom). Now you want to take the Second Amendment, and use
that to weasel and twist your way out of an agreement, all while retaining the
gain (freedom) that the agreement gave you. This is irrational, and judges will
not allow it, properly so.
You probably have heard it said that Federal Judges will
tell defendants and counsel in Section 7203 --Willful Failure To File criminal
"...the Constitution does not apply here. "
That statement shocks most people up a wall --but it is an
accurate and correct statement, The Judge will never tell you why, though. Of
all of the different Judges that I know who have blurted out that statement,
none of the criminal defendants have ever pressed the Judge for an explanation
as to why the Constitution does not apply, The reason why the Constitution does
not apply is because the Judge is merely enforcing PRIVATE Agreements the
defendant signed with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Judge is not a
fifth column commie pinko; the PRIVATE Agreement the Judge has in front of him
is not the defendant's 1040 or the defendant's W-2/4; those are merely
declarations of facts and no profit or gain is experienced by them. The real
reason is as follows: PAY CLOSE ATTENTION NOW…
When new Federal Judges are hired (nominated by the
President and later confirmed by the Senate) after hearings by the Senate
Judiciary Committee -- after they go through that hiring procedure in
Washington -- they are taken back to Washington and are taken into PRIVATE
seminars that are sponsored by the United States Department of Justice.
It is in these seminars that new Federal Judges are taught and trained "how
to" manage their criminal proceedings so as to avoid reversible error,
i.e., absence of counsel and trial procedure, etc. They are taught and trained
what the Supreme Court of the United States wants for perfecting due process.
They are given Supreme Court cases to study -- and sitting
next to that new Judge in these seminars is their Appeals Court Justice (who
will be auditing appeals coming out of their trial court), confirming that the
information being taught and presented by Justice Department lawyers is true
and correct and that "Things will be done this way."
If you've been charged with Willful Failure to File,
read below very closely for your filing venue regards the Judge and his
employer's cudgel... the US Attorney.
The Federal Judge probably is not going to want to
disclose what document it is that you executed which created an attachment of equity
jurisdiction. They have been asked not to let the cat-out-of-the-bag.
The IRS handles this "bank account = equity relationship" on a
military style "need-to-know" only type basis*. You can/should
file a writ of MANDAMUS in the Circuit Court of Appeals and/or
PETITION/(DEMAND) for a Subpoena Duces Tecum returnable AGAINST the U.S.
Attorney to COMPEL DISCOVERY of what it is that you signed that created the
attachment of equity jurisdiction that the King's (Congress's) Agents, IRS,
DOJ (for the United States of America?) are now acting under in trying to get a
restraining order or otherwise against you. This type of equity jurisdiction
always attaches by written consent.
* Most of the ms folks running around
terrorizing The People haven't a clue. Only when some of these
essentially good Americans fall low enough and demonstrate enough insensitivity
to the basic meaning of the United States Constitution and/or lack of concern
for their fellow American will they be promoted to the level that entails the
necessary need-to-know. Very few ever reach that level. Probably no more
than 15 to 20 low-life's throughout the nation. (X) Yes, I'm angry.
If this restraining order has already been granted by now
- then get rid of your bank accounts and file a Petition/(DEMAND) (do not
confuse with a "Motion" which is merely a "request") for
reversal next January -- your arguments being then that you are not in an
equity relationship with the King anymore. Then the First Amendment would apply
then, but it does not apply to you now since you are in an equity relationship
with the King and private agreements overrule the Bill of Rights.
Rest Of The Story
Judges are given a "Bench Book" to take
with them, giving the new Judge guidance on handling problems as they arise on
the bench. Finally, the interesting part comes: They are taught how to manage
"Tax Protester" trials -- violations of Title 26. Federal
Judges have been instructed that the Supreme Court ruled in 1896 in a case
called Davis vs. Elmira Savings, 161 U.S. 275 that national banks are "INSTRUMENTALITIES"
of the Congress.
In other words, or "in effect" legally,
albeit unlawfully (un-Constitutionally -- and that's why the judges will not WILLFULLY
disclose the nature of the alleged equity agreement), the interstate system of
banks is the private property of Congress. This means that any profit or
gain anyone experienced, even you, by a bank/thrift and loan/employee credit
union – any Congressionally regulated financial institution carries with
it --as an operation of law -- the identical same full force and effect
as if the Congress* itself created the gain. So as an operation of law, anyone
who has a depository relationship, or a credit relationship, with a bank, such
as checking, savings, CD's, charge cards, car loans, real estate mortgages,
etc., are experiencing profit and gain created by the King -- so says the
Supreme Court. Remember, that one of the definitions of the United States is
any "Instrumentality" of the... United States.
*(of the United States
of America? -- or was it the Congress of the United States? -- here's that
entity again. Take note that the US Constitution created only ONE Congress
and that was of the United States NOT the United States of America.
Carefully read and re-read the United States Constitution. It is the "FUNDAMENTAL"
Law. You'l1 see it in 48 separate and discrete references to the United States.
When did the government of the United States become the government of the
United States of America?)
The court does not wish to reveal this because I believe
that it's scared shitless that it can be attacked mercilessly. For
instance...how can this "instrumentality" doctrine operate on
National Banks when the doctrine was opined by the Supremes in 1896 and the un-Constitutional
Federal Reserve Act didn't come into existence until December 23rd 1913?
Next, does the court really want to open the Pandora's Box of the supreme Court
having to rule on the actual Constitutionality of the Federal Reserve Act
as it was originally written and especially as it's currently written? It's
clearly un-Constitutional in its current form and could never be defended as
anything but... should this "dirty little secret" get out in
the open. Just as an aside, did you know that the Federal Reserve Act is reenacted
every Congress as a "housekeeping" chore? In actuality it's done so
that all of Congress is at stake should this fraud ever be discovered. They'll
be scurrying in every direction to save their "collective" butts and
be willing to do whatever it takes to conceal the issue. Same as the Congress
that was faced with the original bankruptcy circa 1928/1933 when it all came to
At the present time, most of us have bank accounts
(because you accept checks as payment for books and subscriptions,
contributions, etc.), and you are very much in an Equity Relationship with the
In the words of Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter: "Equity
is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements."
Or in other words, Judges don't like the idea of being
thought upon as being mean Gestapo agents -- doing the dirty work for the King
(Congress). They consider themselves as being stuck between a rock and a hard
spot -- being asked to enforce agreements and without being given any valid
reason as to why you should be let out of it -- other than you just don't feel
like being incarcerated. Also without you the defendant having any specific
knowledge of the details. Kinda like a secret law without really being a secret
law. The whole scam was developed before the turn of the twentieth century by
lawyers in our government working for Rothschild and Warburg. Clever beyond
belief. The Fed was doomed to bankruptcy long before Warburg penned the words
on Jekyll Island in 1910.
So what happens during these Willful Failure to File
trials is that:
- The Intelligence
Division of the IRS surveys the local banks in the vicinity of the tax
protester and obtains copies of the protester's signature card and
financial transactions statements from the bank. (On all signature cards
today we unwittingly agree to being a "U. S. Person". And
we all know the definition of a U. S. "Person" as it
would relate to Title 26... riiiigghhtt…Light bulbs going
- At the
time the U.S. Attorney requests the Judge to sign the Summons, the Judge
has been presented with your bank account information. He's staring
directly at BONA FIDE copies of your "signature card". So
now during the prosecution the Federal Judge is sitting up there on the
bench with your agreement with the King (Congress) in front of him
while the tax protester (you) argues:
"Well, Judge, the
Fourth Amendment says..." "Judge, the Fifth Amendment says I don't
Are you beginning to see why the Judge is prone to
experience frustration and blurt out "The Constitution does not
apply here!"? He just won't tell you "...the rest of the
Meanwhile, the Judge is ignoring all Constitutionally
related arguments and denying all motions... and from his perspective
rightfully so. Remember, you're not in a judicial" court but a
"Legislative" court. It's really the right venue -- just that you
haven't a clue. It's essentially FRAUD, constructive FRAUD, but because you
can't figure it out it's never going to be exposed. That is until now.
If you would go back to your bank and ask the manager show
you your signature card again, in small print I will see that you have
agreed to being a "U. S. 'Person" and the words, something to the
effect: "The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of
Have you ever asked to see a copy of ALL the bank rules? A
complete exposure? If you have, you will read and find out that you
agreed to abide by all of the administrative rulings of the Secretary of the
Treasury, among many other things.
What is really happening in Willful Failure to File
prosecutions is that the Judge is operating on the penal clause to a civil
contract. And since you have agreed PRIVATELY to be bound by Title 26, what
difference does it make whether or not Title 26 was ever enacted by the
Congress? A PRIVATE contract does not have to be enacted by Congress -- in
whole or in part -- in order to make it enforceable, penal clauses included.
Just when we thought it was safe
to stop reading…
Bankruptcy of the "United States:
Presented to the House of Representatives on March 17,1993
by: Rep. James A. Traficant
(Now in federal prison -- guess why?)
Mr. Speaker, we are here now in Chapter 11. Members of
Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of
any bankrupt entity in world history, the US government. We are setting forth,
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's
report that will lead to our demise.
It is an established fact that the United States
Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency banking Act, March 9,
1933, 48 Stat. 1 public Law 890719; declared by President Roosevelt, being
bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress session of June S, 1933 ---
Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause
dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official
capacities of all United States governmental offices, officers, and departments
and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today
in name only.
The receivers of the United States bankruptcy are the
International bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund. All United States offices, officials and
departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under
Emergency War powers. With the constitutional Republican form of government now
dissolved, the receivers of the bankruptcy had adopted a new form of government
for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy,
being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for
America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing
the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the
International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955
reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of treasury receives no compensation
for representing the United States".
Editors Note: 2004
you/we may want to call Jim Traficant, and face it, there are a number of great
adjectives, one thing is for sure: he cared more for the truth than for
you've just read is entered in the Congressional Record. By and of itself that
does not make it 100% accurate and credible. (In fact he got it wrong. The
federal corporation known as the "United States" went into
receivership because of the easier disclosure rules.) However, with that said,
over a period of more than 50 years, it is firmly believed by thousands of
researchers that what you've read is the basis of the reason many people down
through those same 50 years turn up missing, silenced or dead. Jim Traficant is
not the first victim that resulted from publicly uttering these words.
you read of Congressman Hansen's torture ordeal, please keep in mind that the
IRS is merely the Pit Bull collection agency driven by the PRIVATELY owned US
Federal Reserve: NOT an "Agency" of the Constitutional government of
the United States. (No "organic" document exists.) Hence the 80-year
long controversy about just where the IRS has actual JURISDICTION.)
Since the Federal
Reserve Is truly a 100% PRIVATE corporation there is no easy method to
determine who owns 100% of the Class "A" Common Voting stock. The
reason that the excerpt of Congressman Traficant's record is included is not so
much to educate you about the specific issue. It's here to show you first hand
that there are POLITICAL PRISONERS in the US federal system. Most of them are
unknown to the public. Mainstream Media has a self-interest in concealing this
fact. The primary owners of the "Fed" are sister and brother to those
that own most of our digital and print media. There is a strong belief that
there is a direct ownership and control linkage between Mainstream Media and
the US Federal Reserve.
these paragraphs do nothing more than pique your curiosity, drive you to do
your own research regards the incremental and unyielding theft of the American
people by a cunning foreign interest, than they have succeeded in drawing you
closer to understanding the dimension of what appears to be the greatest bank
job in the history of mankind.
is not a statement declaring belief in Congressman Traficant's innocence or
guilt. Merely that a common denominator runs through certain lives associated
with certain issues. How long before we wake up?)
A Vindicated Congressman Hansen
The government drove George Hansen, a 7-term veteran US
lawmaker out of Congress, sent him to prison and financially destroyed him and
his family! It took ten long years, but the U.S. Supreme Court now confirms
that federal prosecution of Congressman George Hansen SHOULD NEVER HAVE
Congressman George Hansen was a seven-term congressman
from Idaho at the time of his prosecution. Ex-Representative Richard
Stallings, the Democrat who defeated Hansen In 1984, said the conviction was
the key. "George could have had the 2nd district as long as he wanted. If
he hadn't gotten in trouble, he'd probably be the Chairman of the Banking
Hansen would be in his 14th term now. "If
you want to play "What if" games, there would have been a lot of
things... chairmanships, leaderships…" Hansen said, "But I just don't
look back. "
Hansen's 1984 conviction cost him his bid for an eighth
term in 1984 – by a mere 170 votes. It also brought incarceration in a federal
prison and a $40,000 fine. In December of 1995, the conviction was vacated by
the trial judge in Washington D.C. who managed to delay Hansen's release for
another 5 months. Between "diesel therapy" and other tortures
at the hands of fellow Americans in the US Marshals Service, Hansen is a shell
of what he used to be. All done at the hands of an allegedly benevolent
government because he threatened to bring attention to our unlawful
money system. During the weeks and months of diesel therapy, the
prisoner is out of contact with the rest of the world. In the case of
Congressman Hansen, his wife did not know if he was dead or alive. His lawyer
could not find him and therefore could not file court papers on time. Even the members
of congress who were still trying to help him, could not locate him. During his
diesel therapy he disappeared into the black hole dug and run by the United
States Marshal service.
Hansen got back his $40,000, but wants a lot more. He's
asking the House to withdraw its reprimand and pay him for legal fees and lost
wages. "I feel like the guy On Boot Hill with the tombstone that says.
"Hanged by Mistake," Hansen said.
Along with Congressman Traficant Congressman Hansen was
one of the first members of Congress, to point a finger at the privately owned
and controlled US Fed and its PRIVATE collection agency... the IRS. In
the late 70s he wrote a book called "To Harass Our People".
Hansen was the first to get a full-scale investigation into the crimes of
the IRS against the American people. Outrage over what he discovered played
a major role in the subsequent writing and ultimate passage of the 1988
"Taxpayers Bill of Rights." Without the determination of Congressman
Hansen, by now the IRS would probably be the American equal to the Gestapo.
Hansen was concerned about the operation of the Federal Reserve and; the undue
power it exercises over the National Debt and Congress. He was planning an
investigation into these matters when charges were filed.
and other Congressional Records
specific to pgs 12595-12603
to the House on June 10. 1932,
T. McFadden Excerpts:
Quotations below are from several speeches made on the
Floor of the House of Representatives by the Honorable Louis T. McFadden
of Pennsylvania. Mr. McFadden, due to his having served as Chairman of the
Banking and Currency Committee for more than 10 years, was the best posted
man on these matters in America and was in a position to speak with authority
about the silent US Receivership. As Representative of a State which was among
the first to declare its freedom from foreign money tyrants, it is fitting that
Pennsylvania, the cradle of liberty, be again given the credit for producing a
son that was not afraid to hurl defiance in the face of the money-bund. Whereas
Mr. McFadden was elected to the high office on both the Democratic AND
Republican tickets, there can be no accusation of partisanship lodged against
him. Because these speeches are set out in full in the Congressional Record,
they carry weight that no amount of condemnation on the part of private
individuals could hope to carry.
was no national emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took office excepting
the bankruptcy of the Fed - a bankruptcy which has been going on under cover
for several years and which has been concealed from the people
so that the people would continue to permit their bank deposits and their bank
reserves and their gold and the funds of the United States Treasury to be impounded
in these bankrupt institutions."
people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They
are NOT government institutions. They are private credit monopolies
which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their
FOREIGN and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders."
twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon
this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us our
hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money
out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a
reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They
instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia, and thus drove a
wedge between the allies in World War. They financed Trotsky's passage from New
York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian
Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution, and placed a large
fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal in one of their branch banks in
April 27, 1932, the Fed outfit sent $750,000 belonging to American bank
depositors in gold to Germany. A week later another $300,000 in gold was
shipped to Germany. About the middle of May $12,000,000 in gold was shipped to
Germany by the Fed. Almost every week there is a shipment of gold to Germany.
These shipments are not made for profit on the exchange since the German marks
are below parity with the dollar."
On May 23rd 1933, Representative Louis T.
McFadden brought formal charges of
Conspiracy, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion and Treason against
the Federal Reserve Board.
The subsequent Petition for Articles of Impeachment was
referred to the Judiciary Committee. It's now 2005. It has yet to be acted
When The People fear their
Government, there is tyranny.
When the Government fears
It's People, there is
-- Thomas Paine
So, with that statement let's finish this pamphlet with
something that should beg more questions.
It should be remembered that David Rockefeller's granddad,
John D. along with Paul Warburg and Britain’s (originally Germany's) Rothschild
apparatus (Bauer -Pawer, author of, De Re Metallica) wrote and had passed the
US Federal Reserve Act in 1913. An Act that created a privately owned
central bank that for all intents and purpose is mistakenly believed by
the American people to be federally owned and operated. (Boy are they surprised
when they find out the Fed who distributes our currency, controls the National
Debt and that collects all the interest due is PRIVATELY owned.)
Money being fungible, when the Rockefeller Cartel fully
financed Mr. Truman's rise to the presidency, it's unclear whether the dollars
used, came from Rockefeller's oil largesse or from the dollars paid to their
federally TAX FREE trusts due to their partial private ownership of the us
Federal Reserve. Dollars paid to the Rockefeller's, et al, through the American
people's Industry and hard labor in the form of the Income tax. An"
Income" tax that's used almost exclusively to pay merely the interest
charges against the fabricated National Debt to the privately owned US Fed.
Thanks to FDR In 1933, it should be noted that all this money is paid to these
crooked bastards... statutorily tax-free.*
* TITLE 12 > CHAPTER 4 > SUBCHAPTER I
Exemption From Taxation
Federal reserve banks,
including the capital stock and surplus therein and the income derived
therefrom, shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except
taxes upon real estate.
The Story Behind JFK's Executive Order 11110
(Note: Attorney Larry
Becraft tries to dismiss the following with the most convoluted misinformation
on the subject. In my opinion, if he has shown his true colors and just who is
his real employer it's with this issue.)
Shown below is a specimen of the unlawful/un-Constitutional
Federal Reserve Note that we are accustomed to seeing every day. That
"Title" (Federal Reserve Note) sits just above the name of the owner
of this alleged currency, (debt) the "United States of America. " (Find
the "organic" document that created this entity and you'll have found
the modern day equivalent of the Holy Grail.) The "Note" itself is
NOT money. Rather it's the debt of the nation, a sham, an un-Constitutional
device that is unlawful (un-Constitutional) in every way possible and a
constructive fraud, issued by a creditor that for the most part is owned by
foreigners. Hence, it would appear that once known and understood by very few
of The People (less than 10% will provide critical mass), those in Congress
that reaffirm the US Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as a "housekeeping"
measure with each and every new Congress are probably guilty of nothing less
There are many in government that are fully aware and will
do anything to conceal the truth. ANYTHING!!! Read your headlines!!! Better yet
arrest a few of these so-called career politicians. Remove Senator Hatch,
Spector or Senator Waxman or many of the other career politicians*, of our
times to an undisclosed location, possibly Gitmo or "render" them to
Syria for intense questioning on the subject.
politicians keep their seats for one of two reasons: they're actually very good
and loved by their constituency or they have learned certain things that make
them a threat if they're not in office. Then there are those like Jim Traficant
or George Hansen who were in process of learning what was going on but couldn’t
be bought off.
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE
Every Federal Reserve Note (Dollar) distributed into the
US economy by the PRIVATELY owned US Federal Reserve represents "US
National Debt". This debt accrues "Interest". A minimum of tens
of BILLIONS in ANNUAL "Interest" Is collected from "Income"
taxes paid by The People against their industry and labor, their ultimate
property. This "Interest" is paid as "Income" that has been
made statutorily TAX FREE* to PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS. These
"INDIVIDUALS" are now the Descendant Apparatus that today continue to
PRIVATELY own and control the "Fed".
* See Title 12, Section 531.
Shown on page 14 is an actual specimen of JFK's United
States Note. Stated as such just above the "Title" The United
States of America. There are those that would guarantee you that the
"organic document" that created the entity (United States of America)
shown on JFK's United States Note is a different "organic document"
than that which create" the entity (United States of America) of the same
shown on the un-Constitutional Federal Reserve Note. The United States Note was
lawfully/Constitutionally backed by SILVER. The issuance of the 1958 United
States Note would have begun a process that ultimately would have
returned our nation to The People and restored our sovereign status as a
nation among nations. This status is more desirable than a debtor under the
yoke of a few cunning swindlers. Swindlers and scam artists supporting the
unlawful development of a renegade middle-eastern nation at the expense of its
indigenous population. And also at the expense of American interests and American
lives that are lost daily.
As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes
were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United
States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury
Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President
Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the alleged lawful
currency were un-Constitutional.
"United States Notes" were issued as an
INTEREST-FREE and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S.
Treasury. About five (5) months after Issuing Executive Order 11110 president
Kennedy was assassinated* on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he
had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes
continued to serve as the legal/procedural currency of the nation. (However,
the alleged currency is not lawful/Constitutional inasmuch as its use is purely
voluntary although The People haven't a clue.) According to the United States
Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999
are Federal Reserve Notes.
indications lead reasonable people to believe that it was done under contract
by mobster Gregory Scarpa Sr. and handled by Rockefeller's CIA. Read The Riot
Act Pamphlet "History Lesson".
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes
were widely circulated, they would have begun the elimination of use of debt
backed Federal Reserve Notes. This is a simple matter of economics. The USN was
backed by silver and the FRN was backed by nothing of intrinsic value.
Executive Order 11110 would have prevented the National Debt from reaching its
current level if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. (Virtually
all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963)
Enforcement of Executive Order 11110 would facilitate the U.S. Government’s
ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks
and being charged interest to crate new "money." Executive Order
11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed
Ike’s & JFK’s
Ike's/JFK's US Note threatened the so-called earnings
represented by the "Interest" payments to the PRIVATE owners of the
"Fed". Furthermore, the US Note would have begun severe erosion of
the accompanying and more perverse (also highly un-Constitutional) power
exercised over the Congress of the United States. All facilitated by the
"National Debt". It continues today until We The People put a stop to
Good men and women in the US military being used as a
cudgel for PRIVATE interests are dying every day in foreign lands. PRIVATE
interests that created the underlying conflicts in the first place!
It's a desperately sick
Louis T. McFadden was Chairman of the House Currency and
Finance Committee before, during and after the so-called "Great
Depression". (Really Great Deception) McFadden knew first hand what had
happened to our nation. Representative McFadden was poisoned at a banquet
shortly after filing the charges noted on the previous page in a very PUBLIC
way similar to JFK. McFadden's poisoning was a warning to those present not to
disclose the truth. As much as he did know, McFadden did NOT know the Fed's
bankruptcy was planned before Mssrs. Warburg, Rothschild, Morgan and
Rockefeller even formed the entity.
The quote on the next page from the seventh (7th)
generation of what is known as the Rothschild Apparatus (International/Jewish*)
banker is what Jefferson understood and feared the most. It is the antithesis
of where The Founder's law, our beloved United States Constitution demands we
should be today.
* Read The
Riot Act Pamphlet "The Jews Did Nothing, Leave Them Be". Rockefeller
and Morgan were Christians. Are all Christians guilty? No!! But they [Rockefeller, Morgan, and associated company]
are all... CROOKS!!!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money…
...and I care not who writes its laws!"
Nathaniel (Nattie) Rothschild, "The" International Banker, a distant
7th generation grandchild of Meyer Amschel Bauer (shown above), in a speech to
a gathering of world bankers February 12,1912.
had reason to be cocky. On 12/31/1913 "his" Privately owned US
Federal Reserve was signed into law by a coerced President Woodrow Wilson.
Mayer was a 6/7th Generation International banker. Circa
1640 his ancestors changed their name from Pawer to Bauer, and then circa 1815
from Bauer to Rothschild. Down through history, the Rothschild’s have been
morphing their identity and hiding. Today their camouflage is beyond insidious.
You'll see that in "Invisible Contracts".
Since 1913, the Rothschild/Warburg APPARATUS owns a
majority stake in our nation's US Federal Reserve. In 2005 they are now in
their 13th generation of the same business of owning, controlling and
MANIPULATING many a nation's debt.
Crisis (1st paragraph}
By Thomas Paine
December 23, 1776
THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer
soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service
of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of
man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this
consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the
triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only
that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon
its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM
should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has
declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in
ALL CASES WHATSOEVER"* and if being bound in that manner is not
slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the
expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.
[The emphasis shown above is By
- The underlined passage
above is self-evident. It refers to the King - now our Imperial Congress.
It's 230 years later. We're stealthily attached with the same Velcro-like
legal devices (courtroom tricks) that BIND us In ALL CASES WHATSOEVER that
led directly to the American Revolution. Same tricks, different times, BUT
just as aggrieved a population today as there was then. We're finally waking
up but with one addition. It's now been uncovered that in order to do
these "things" a National BANKRUPTCY was planned with malice
aforethought, and executed brilliantly by the King's 20th
century protégées: a well educated money lender, better known today as the
"Rothschild Apparatus". The Rothschilds were
"freelancing" with OUR nation in the late 1800's. This is old
hat to these cunning bastards. We've all been well conned. Until now!!