all items presented in public interest
without prejudice - no liabilty for any use - unauthorized use
(Search for hidden messages.)
F.Y.I.: It is an unconstitutional
violation of due process of law for any judge or prosecutor to
"presume" that one may be a franchisee called a "taxpayer"
without any supporting evidence. All such presumptions also
amount to the establishment of a religion by the government,
because they amount to a belief that either is not supported by
evidence or is not required to be supported by evidence.
Further, if Federal courts can’t make declaratory
judgments relating to federal taxes, then how can they decide
that one may be a "taxpayer" who is subject to the franchise
agreement to begin with? If they are enjoined from declaring
people "taxpayers", then they can’t enforce the franchise
agreement against anyone because they can’t determine who
is subject to it.
Understand the legal reality, namely that "taxpayer"
means "fiduciary" and that has to be asserted at what
may be the one and only time to compel "them" judicially to
prove up the basis for their purported claim, namely the
necessary trust agreement on which their claim depends.
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
"Nobody owes any public duty to pay
more than the law demands... " These are the words
of Judge Learned Hand (1872-1961), Judge, U.S. Court of
Appeals in the case of Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F.2d 809, 810 (2d
Cir. 1934), aff´d, 293 U.S. 465, 55 S.Ct. 266, 79 L.Ed. 596
Anyone may arrange his affairs
that his taxes shall be as low as possible; He is not bound to
choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury; There is not even
a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.
Over and over again courts have said there is nothing sinister in
so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible, everyone
does it, rich and poor alike and all do right; for nobody owes any
public duty to pay more than the law demands. (f) Taxes are an
enforceable extraction, and not a voluntary contribution.
All truth passes through three
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident. —Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
"The laws of Congress in respect to those matters [Federal Income
Taxation] do not extend into the territorial limits of the states,
but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places
that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national
Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211, 215, 14 S. Ct. 513 (1894)
"Until the control of the issue of currency and
credit is restored to government and recognized as its most
conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talks of the sovereignty
of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile... Once a nation
parts with the control of its credit, it matters not who makes the
laws... Usury once in control will wreck the nation."
--William Lyon Mackenzie King PC OM CMG (1874-12-17 –
1950-07-22) the tenth Prime Minister of Canada
According to the Internal Revenue Manual (dated
5, Collection Activity
(1) Our system of taxation is dependent on
taxpayers´ belief that the tax laws they
follow apply to everyone and that the Internal
Revenue Service will respect and protect their rights under the law. These are fundamental
principles of voluntary
- above curiously missing from current issue.) Are you a believer in voluntary
compliance? Laws are mandatory on [those] the
subjects of them. Compliance is
only voluntary where
it is not
mandatory. Think about that for a while.
F.Y.I.: As it appears, the IRS has no jurisdiction to apply
their ´special laws´ for the District of Columbia over
American Nationals [nonresident alien non-individuals] who derive no
income that is effectively connected with the conduct of ´the
performance of the functions of a public office´ [trade or
business as defined at 26 USC §7701(a)(26)] within the
´District of Columbia´ [the United States as defined at 26
USC §7408(d)] or participate in any federal franchise
The Internal Revenue Service is the National
Government´s tax bill collection bureau. The statutory laws it
operates under are found in Title 26 of the United States Code. This
is also referenced as the IRC or Internal Revenue Code. The IRC
statutes were created by Congress.
The only group that the IRS is
authorized to deal with are those identified in 26 USC
§7701(a)(14) to be ´Taxpayers´. The IRC shows that the
term ´taxpayer´ means any person subject to any internal
revenue tax. There is no issue with their authority to address
´Taxpayers´ but one needs to understand that their
statutory laws are applicable only toward those who are
´Taxpayers´ or just as commonly the IRS uses the term "U.S.
persons" as ´Taxpayers´.
As stated in the
federal court case Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F.2d,
"Revenue laws relate to
´taxpayers´ [legal fictions created by the Congress,
officers, employees, certain U.S. citizens, resident aliens,
elected officials of the national government, and those who operate
in a representative capacity in behalf of the national government
such as via a federal franchise established by the Social Security
Act of 1935 by being engaged in the conduct and performance of the
functions of a public office called a ´trade or business´
within the District of Columbia referenced as ´the United
States´] and NOT to ´Non Taxpayers´ [American
Nationals a.k.a., non-resident alien non-individuals who have no
physical or statutory domicile within the District of Columbia and
do not derive any income from being engaged in the conduct of a
trade or business within the District of Columbia]. The latter are without their scope of revenue laws. No
procedures are prescribed for non-taxpayers and no attempt is made
to annul any of their Rights or Remedies in due course of law. With
them Congress does not assume to deal and they are neither of the
subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws."
[Emphasis & Clarifications
Interesting ...as received from the
Secretary of State of Texas: certification
All warfare is based on
If ´they´ lie, mislead, misspeak,
misdirect you from the judge´s bench, what makes you think the
pastor/priest/rabbi doesn´t do the same from their pulpit?
Someone say, "Misrepresentation"?
What manner of "employee" might you be?
Consider U.S. v. Bass, 784 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1986), the trial judge
instructed Bass´s jury that Bass qualified as an "employee" relevant
to chapter 24 of the IRC just because he was a commonly-defined employee.
However, Bass never disputed being a commonly-defined employee; he simply
argued that he was not a statutorily-defined "employee" and said that
whether he qualified as the latter was a matter for the government to try
to prove and his jury to decide. The 5th circuit said, "You
betcha´!" and reversed Bass´s nine-count conviction.
"We have a single system, and in that system the only question is the
price at which the proletariat is to be bought and sold, the bread and
circuses." "The whole fabric of society will go to wrack if we really lay
hands of reform on our rotten institutions. From top to bottom the whole
system is a fraud, all of us know it, laborers and capitalists alike, and
all of us are consenting parties to it." -- Henry Adams
"The revenue laws are a code or
system in regulation of tax assessment and collections. They relate
to taxpayers and NOT to nontaxpayers.
The latter are without their scope. No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is
made to annul any of their Rights and remedies in due course of law. With
them [nontaxpayers] Congress does not assume to deal, and they [nontaxpayers] are neither of the subject
nor of the object of the revenue laws." Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F.
236, at 238 (1922) Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S., 470 F.2d 585, at
589 (1972). (Emphasis added.)(more quotes)
...no prince is ever benefited by making
12 U.S.C. Sec. 411 01/23/00
TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER 3 - FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
SUBCHAPTER XII - FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES
Sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation
Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the
purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the
Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no
other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be
obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all
national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all
taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be
redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department
of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of
Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank. [Bold emphasis
Preacher/Shepherd Wakes His Flockvery informative and MOST
IMPRESSIVE (Needed caveat, Freedom
School applauds well done presentations of topics that are
worthy of attention such as this one - and while we applaud one
it doesn´t mean that we applaud all that flows from any
particular individual - such is the case with this
VIDEO: Paul Grignon´s 47-minute animated
presentation of "Money as Debt" tells in very simple and
effective graphic terms what money is and how it is being
created. It is an entertaining way to get the message
out. Money As Debt
for more visit: www.moneyasdebt.net/
"The few who understand the system will either be so
interested from it´s profits or so dependent on its
favors that there will be no opposition from that class."
-- Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
Definitions have always
been a point of contention when dealing with government agencies, the
courts, and especially lawyers. The classic example is President Clinton,
during his impeachment trial, stating, "...it depends on what you mean by
is." Fortunately, government definitions are usually available somewhere in
the documentation they are using or referring too. Also, some of the
definitions used by the IRS have been judicially resolved. With that in
mind, take a look at the following terms:
The term "United States" means Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam,
and the U.S. Virgin Islands and other "owned" territories of the
The term "State" (capitalized) means one of those places listed
The term "state" (not capitalized) refers to one of the 50 states or
The word "income" does not mean wages, tips, salaries, and other
compensation for labor according to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. Also see Black’s Law Dictionary. Income is the
"returnv in money from using your capital to make money, i.e., profits
and interest. Even then it must be earned in the corporate United
The term "includes" means ONLY those items or places which are
specifically listed after the word "includes". IT DOES NOT MEAN items or
places not listed. See, INCLUDES
Open a bank
account? (Use at own
Have available or obtain a
form of identification (for example, passport, driver license, etc.) with
no social security number.
Take a witness with you and
two copies of the Constructive Notice
Go to a bank where you are not
Indicate that you want to open
a non-interest-bearing account.
Indicate that you do not wish
to provide a social security number or taxpayer identification number and
that, according to the Privacy Act, it is illegal to demand one. If
necessary, ask that the bank representative consult their supervisor or
If the bank representative
still refuses to open the account, fill out both copies of the
Constructive Notice, signed by both you and your
Hand one of the copies to the
If the bank representative
still refuses to open the account, then find a lawyer to sue the bank
representative personally, as well as the bank.
The filing of a withholding agreement
(W-4 or W-9) is voluntary [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)]
The voluntary withholding agreement may be terminated at any time by the
worker or the hiring entity [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)(2)]
Internal Revenue Service
is only authorized to collect an Income Tax from corporations.
"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere
privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes
its existence and charter powers to the state; but the individuals´
Right to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of
which an excise cannot be imposed." Corn v. Fort, 95 S.W.2d 620 (1936)
Information as found in IRS´s Instructions for Form W-8BEN (2/2006)
"Nonresident alien individual. Any individual who is not a
citizen or resident alien of the United States is a nonresident alien
individual. An alien individual meeting either the "green card test"
or the "substantial presence test" for the calendar year is a
resident alien. Any person not meeting either test is a nonresident
alien individual. Additionally, an alien individual who is a resident
of a foreign country under the residence article of an income tax
treaty, or an alien individual who is a bona fide resident of Puerto
Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, or American Samoa is a nonresident alien
individual. See Pub. 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens, for more
information on resident and nonresident alien status."
DISCUSSION: A key word here is "individual" - in common
language might be presumed to be an [individual] man or woman; Title
26 defines the word differently and it is not what one might think;
see section # 3. Check it out for
yourself. Familiarize yourself with the information found in
the New Hire Paperwork Attachment Also, do you
have a ´green card´ or "substantial presence" within the
[corporate] United States? Are you a "resident" anywhere?
See also, About Form W-8BEN
One does need to know just who one is or one may be presumed and
taken for whatever someone else wants that one to be.
Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil
Status. See Form 13.008
Title 26 C.F.R. Sec. 31.3402(p)-1
Voluntary withholding agreements.
(a) In general. An employee and his employer may enter into an
agreement under section 3402(b) to provide for the withholding of
income tax upon payments of amounts described in paragraph (b)(1)
of Sec. 31.3401(a)-3, made after December 31, 1970.
(b) Form and duration of agreement. (1)(I) Except as provided in
subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph, an employee who desires to
enter into an agreement under section 3402(p) shall furnish his
employer with Form W-4 (withholding exemption certificate)
executed in accordance with the provisions of section 3402(f) and
the regulations thereunder. The furnishing of such Form W-4 shall
constitute a request for withholding.
(c) A statement that the employee desires withholding of Federal
income tax, and applicable, of qualified State individual income
tax (see paragraph (d)(3)(I) of Sec. 301.6361-1 of this chapter
(Regulations on Procedures and Administration)), and (d) If the
employee desires that the agreement terminate on a specific date,
the date of termination of the agreement. If accepted by the
employer as provided in subdivision (iii) of this subparagraph,
the request shall be attached to, and constitute part of, the
employee´s Form W-4. An employee who furnishes his employer
a request for withholding under this subdivision shall also
furnish such employer with Form W-4 if such employee does not
already have a Form W-4 in effect with such employer. (iii) No
request for withholding under section 3402(p) shall be effective
as an agreement between an employer and an employee until the
employer accepts the request by commencing to withhold from the
amounts with respect to which the request was made. (2) An
agreement under section 3402 (p) shall be effective for such
period as the employer and employee mutually agree upon.
However, either the employer or the employee may terminate
the agreement prior to the end of such period by furnishing a
signed written notice to the other. Unless the employer and
employee agree to an earlier termination date, the notice shall
be effective with respect to the first payment of an amount in
respect of which the agreement is in effect which is made on or
after the first ``status determination date´´ (January
1, May 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year) that occurs at
least 30 days after the date on which the notice is
furnished. If the employee executes a new Form W-4,
the request upon which an agreement under section 3402 (p) is
based shall be attached to, and constitute a part of, such new
The filing of a withholding agreement (W-4 or W-9) is voluntary [26 CFR
A voluntary withholding agreement may be terminated at any time by the
worker or the hiring entity [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)(2)].
Me, I am not aware of any section of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) or
its enabling regulations that requires me, an individual American NOT
involved in a revenue-taxable activity, a non-taxpayer, to file a Form
1040 or pay [so-called] 'income taxes'.
"IRS Form 668-W ... does not
provide authority to levy wages of private citizens in the private sector."
See, Member of Congress, Dennis M.
"The taxpayer must be liable for the tax.
Tax liability is a condition precedent to the demand. Merely demanding
payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability". Boathe v. Terry, 713
F.2d 1405, at 1414 (1983)
The U.S. Supreme Court
said in Thatcher v. Powell, 19 U.S. 119, 6 Wheat. 119 (1821) that
no public officer can take any action affecting your property ""unless
authorized so to do by express law, "and that the person invested with such
a power, must pursue with precision the course prescribed by law, or his
act is invalid""
Are you aware that the
IRS can take property from people without a court
Are you aware that
governments cannot exercise powers the people do not have and
hence cannot grant to governments?
Can one conclude,
therefore, that if the IRS has the "right" to take property
without a court order, it is because [originally] the Citizens
also have such a right?
Then the question is, if
the IRS can take property without a court order, how does an
average Citizen go about doing the same
As you may also be aware,
using the Courts to deprive others of property is expensive and
[seemingly] takes forever.
Any information that can
be supplied on how to avoid lengthy court battles [and thereby
lessen judicial burden], and use mere letters, like IRS´s
notices of lien and notices of levy will be greatly
Thank you for your
thoughtful and timely response.
F.Y.I.: Congress defines
the term "taxpayer" at 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(14) as "any person subject
to any internal revenue tax." What is a "internal revenue tax"
one may ask? Notice "internal revenue tax" is not found defined
anywhere in the tax codes of the United States or anyplace else.
Hey Mr. IRS
TAXMAN; Tax Code §§ 1402(b), 3121(e) 3306(j), and 42 U.S.C.
§ 411(b)(2), define "citizen" and they do not mention me - an
American, and after a diligent search I find there is no statute that
mentions my citizenship as a subject of the Tax Code. if anything,
I’m only named in regulation 26 CFR 1.1-1 by the U.S. Treasury. This
appears to violate the 16th Amendment that you guys seem to rely on which
says that only Congress may lay and collect income taxes. Now, how say
Hey Mr. IRS
TAXMAN; after a diligent search I find I find that § 83 of your
Tax Code is violated when the value of my personal services is taxed as
gross income, because, I find, only "the excess over the amount paid" is
gross income. Now, how say you?
Where the People fear the Government - you
Where the Government fears the People - you have rights.
Me, I am not aware of any
such CIVP "Kind of Tax(a)" as showing.
I am aware that the IRS
can only issue a levy and relating "Notice of Levy" against federal
employees 26 U.S.C. § 6331(a) without implementing regulations, as
required by, 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(2), 26 C.F.R. § 601.702(a)(1), 31
C.F.R. § 1.3(a)(4), and 44 U.S.C. § 1505(a)(1). I find nothing
that goes to "John H Doe" being a federal employee.
The Notice of Levy Form,
Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Form 668-Y(c), does
not appear to have a valid OMB Control number. It is my belief that, under
the provisions of the Paperwork reduction Act (PRA), this form may only be
used within the government and may NOT be issued to the general public. The
general public is also told in the act that such a form may safely be
disregarded and is "bogus" if issued without a valid OMB control number.
That said and as it stands, I find the "Notice" item so said above to be
Please take notice that
neither a Federal Tax Lien or a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien" cannot and
should not be issued until an Abstract of Judgment, which is signed by the
clerk of the court summarizing a judgment that was duly signed by a judge,
is firstly obtained by the IRS. As respondent, I am not in possession of
nor aware of any such Abstract.
I rely on this, "Our
system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment and payment, not
distraint." as found in Flora v. U.S., 362 U.S. 145 (1960).
I am aware of and do rely
on this, a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien", IRS Form 668(Y)(c) issued without
an accompanying "Abstract of Judgment" cannot and should not be honored by
the recipient. Any recipient who does honor it is opening themselves up to
civil liability and a tort. This includes county records, title companies,
attorneys, etc. Federal law cannot and does not protect parties who engage
in such tortious activities because federal law has NOT JURISDICTION within
states of the Union.
I am aware of and do rely
on this, "Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt
from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language,
and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to
be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid." as
found in Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 297 (1904).
I am aware of and do rely
on this, that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), codified in
15 U.S.C., Chapter 41, Subchapter V, also requires that all imputed debts,
whether tax related or otherwise, MUST be validated with the original debt
instrument upon demand of the [alleged] debtor within 30 days. This Act
requires in 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a), among other things, that the debt
collection has an obligation to validate any imputed debts. Tax debts
constitute "debts" for the purposes of this provision, and section 3466 of
the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 makes the IRS Subject to the
Provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
don´t accept this offer."
"Me, I don´t consent to this ...."
Are you a citizen of the United States
/ US CITIZEN / TAXPAYER?
F.Y.I.: "Slater´s protestations to the effect that he derives
no benefit from the United States government have no bearing on his legal
obligation to pay income taxes. ... Unless the defendant can establish
that he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS possesses
authority to attempt to determine his federal tax liability."
U.S. v. Slater, 545 F.Supp 179, 182 (1982)
Dennis Leroy Parizek, EIN
I want to express my thanks to the IRS for the professional,
lawful, timely, quick, and efficient processing of so said Form
1040NR for the so said year 2004 mentioned in your Letter
3176(SC))(Rev.7-2007) dated January 12, 2008, as
The 1040 is correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief -- please refer to the signed jurat,
and the signed jurat on the attached Form 4852.
Please take notice that I am not a
"Taxpayer" and kindly stop addressing me as such.
For purposes of this and relating
communication the terms "Frivolous" and "Meritless" shall mean
truthful, accurate, and consistent with prevailing law and
Your offer of contract is being
returned to you unsigned and without recourse.
May I remind you of Title 18
U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an
informant; and 26 U.S.C. § 7214. Offenses by officers and
employees of the United States; and 18 U.S.C. § 872.
Extortion by officers or employees of the United States; and 18
U.S.C. § 876. Mailing threatening communications. I hope
you are not willing to participate or perpetrate any of these
This letter and any and all
relating or attaching documents and reply may become part of
the Public Record and will be used for and as competent
evidence in any administrative or judicial proceedings at law,
or equity as may occur regarding this issue. ALL of these
documents must be maintained in Claimant´s Administrative
does not have a voluntary withholding agreement in place, and therefore
does not earn "wages" as legally defined under 26 C.F.R.
amounts reported on the W-2 should not have been reported at all, and
even if a form had been sent in, Block 1 of the W-2 (wages, tips, and
other compensation) should have been zero.
Me, I am
a "nonresident alien" not engaged in "trade or business" as defined in 26 U.S.C.
7701(a)(26) with no earnings from the "United States" and defined in 26
C.F.R. §1.871-1(b)(i) whose estate is a "foreign estate" as per 26
U.S.C. §7701(a)(31) and who is specifically exempted from receipt
of "gross income", not subject to withholding, backup withholding, and
reporting as per the following: 26 U.S.C. §861(a)(3)(C)(i), 26
U.S.C. §1402(b), 26 U.S.C. §3401(a)(6), 26 U.S.C.
§3406(g), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(a)(6)-1(b), 26 C.F.R.
§31.3406(g)-1(e), 26 C.F.R. §1.872-2(f). Further, I am not an
Title 26 "individual" and I am domiciled and work outside the United States
and outside of federal jurisdiction and therefore not subject to
Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code and not required to make any
gross income reports. 26 U.S.C. 864(b)(1)(A) says that my (private)
earnings are not reportable or taxable. [See F.R.Crim.P., Rule 1(9) "State". See also, Legal Basis for the Term "Nonresident Alien"]
"Those who benefit from any societal mechanism rarely wish to understand
that mechanism, especially if it appears to grant them authority over
their fellow man and understanding that mechanism would limit, diminish,
or remove that apparent power of control or authority. They simply do not
want to know, because it is far easier to ignorantly control others than
it is to wisely control yourself." -- Robert Arthur Menard
Lear´s matter - served for information purposes only.
Well, it seems that the
federal extortion machine won´t be hanging one of their most prizes
trophy heads on the wall just yet. A judge has granted Wesley Snipes bail
pending appeal, which means he stays out while his conviction is appealed,
which could take a year or two, or more.
All that part of the territory of the United States included
within the present limits of the District of Columbia shall be the
permanent seat of government of the United States.
§ 72. Public offices; at seat of Government
All offices attached to the seat of government shall be
exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as
otherwise expressly provided by law.
Statute requires that the Secretary of the
Treasury have express lawful authority to operate outside of D.C., and
it is under that Office that the IRS operates. Tax Code § 7621 is
not that permission. This authority to operate does not exist, at least
no denial of this by the DOJ is made in federal court.
"Gee, Mr. IRS agent, are you even
allowed to talk to me?"
CHRYSLER CORP. v. BROWN, 441
U.S. 281 (1979) [ Footnote 23 ] "There was virtually no Washington
bureaucracy created by the Act of July 1, 1862, ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432, the
statute to which the present Internal Revenue Service can be
BURDEN PLACED ON
PERSONS DEALING WITH AGENT
In Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill,
the Supreme Court ruled: "Whatever the form in
which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with
the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who
purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his
authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by
Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through
the rulemaking power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent
himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his
authority. See, e.g., Utah Power #& Light Co. v. United
States, 243 U. S. 389, 409; United States v. Stewart, 311 U. S. 60, 70, and
see generally 74 U. S. 7 Wall. 666." Federal
Crop Ins. Corp v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947).
Continental Casualty Co. v. United
States, 113 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1940): "Public officers are
merely the agents of the public, whose powers and authority are defined and
limited by law. Any act without the scope of the authority so defined does
not bind the principal, and all persons dealing with such agents are
charged with knowledge of the extent of their authority," 113
F.2d, at 286.
Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378
(9th Cir. 1981): "Persons dealing with the government are charged
with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk
that government agents may exceed their authority and provide
misinformation," 644 F.2d, at 1383.
Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, 650 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1981): "All persons
in the United States are chargeable with knowledge of the Statutes-at-Large * * * [I]t is well established that
anyone who deals with the government assumes the risk that the agent acting
in the government´s behalf has exceeded the bounds of his
authority," 650 F.2d, at 1100.
In re Benny, 29 B.R. 754,
762 (N.D. Cal. 1983): "[A]n unlawful or
unauthorized exercise of power does not become legitimated or authorized by
reason of habitude." See also, Umpleby, by and through
Umpleby v. State, 347 N.W.2d 156, 161 (N.D. 1984).
habitude ( ha(b´ i(-tu-d´, -tyu-d´ )
n. A habitual tendency or way of behaving. See synonyms at habit.
[Middle English, from Latin habitu-do-, condition, from habitus. See habit.]
Relating to Social Security - recinding one´s signature:
Consider that it is not possible for you to "rescind" ‘your’
Social Security number.
First of all the "Social Security number" is not "yours" so you
cannot rescind it.
If one does not believe that their signature was/is valid, why would they
attempt to rescind it?
The only thing [an attempt of] rescinding a contractual obligation does is
to prove the person’s signature on the
contract/instrument. (Technically, both parties need
to agree to the recinding action.)
One can consider rejecting [not participating in] any and all benefits
regarding a particular contract
Discover the terms, "negation", "abandoned."
F.Y.I.: The EIN for the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION is
F.Y.I.: The Social
Security (United States of America) Order
Source: Manta.com Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, United States
Phone: (410) 965-0003
Line of Business:Administrative Social/Manpower Programs
Detailed Social Security Administration Company Profile
This company profile is for the PRIVATE COMPANY Social Security
Administration, headquarters located in Baltimore, MD. Social Security
Administration´s line of business is administrative social/manpower
Year Started: 1974
Contact Name: Patricia Gross
Contact Title: Secretary
(Data above provided by Dunn & Bradstreet)
The term "employee" 31 CFR
§215.2(h)(1)(i) does not include retired personnel, pensioners,
annuitants, or similar beneficiaries of the Federal Government, who are NOT
performing active civilian service or persons receiving remuneration for
services on a contract-fee basis. They are not subject to withholding and
have no duty to file any form W-4 or W-9, unless they desire to voluntarily
enter into agreements.
Tom Cryer´s matter
- served for information purposes only.
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 18]
[Revised as of April 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
(g) Special rules for taxpayer identifying numbers issued to foreign
persons--(1) General rule--(i) Social security number. A social security
number is generally identified in the records and database of the
Internal Revenue Service as a number belonging to a U.S. citizen or
resident alien individual. A person may establish a different status for
the number by providing proof of foreign status with the Internal
Revenue Service under such procedures as the Internal Revenue Service
shall prescribe, including the use of a form as the Internal Revenue
Service may specify. Upon accepting an individual as a nonresident alien
individual, the Internal Revenue Service will assign this status to the
individual´s social security number. [Enlarge and Bold emphasis added.]
Me, I am
a non-taxpayer, a "nonresident alien" not engaged in a "trade or
business" with no earnings from the "United States" and defined in 26
C.F.R. §1.871-1(b)(i) whose estate is a "foreign estate" as per 26
U.S.C. §7701(a)(31) and who is specifically exempted from receipt
of "gross income", not subject to withholding, backup withholding, and
reporting as per the following: 26 U.S.C. §861(a)(3)(C)(i), 26
U.S.C. §1402(b), 26 U.S.C. §3401(a)(6), 26 U.S.C.
§3406(g), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(a)(6)-1(b), 26 C.F.R.
§31.3406(g)-1(e), 26 C.F.R. §1.872-2(f); further, I am not a
Title 26 "individual".
Details on the
status of being a "nonresident alien" look here
Nathan J. Hochman,
Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department´s Tax
Division, announced the creation of the National Tax Defier
Initiative or TAXDEF. The purpose of this initiative is to reaffirm
and reinvigorate the Tax Division´s commitment to investigate,
pursue and, where appropriate, prosecute those who take concrete
action to defy and deny the fundamental validity of the tax laws.
I imagine that King
George III said something very similar back in 1775.
between the lines of the language used, it appears that tax defiance
has become a huge problem, probably far larger than the government
wants to admit. Indeed, I view this announcement as an admission that
the problem has grown to vast proportions.
Now then, let us see
how serious the DOJ is in punishing,
enlightening those who claim the income tax is in fact illegal. Here
is a PDF file of the court transcript from Sullivan v. USA. On page 23, Judge
James C. Fox clearly states that the 16th Amendment was not properly
ratified, a claim repeated by many other tax law experts and never
successfully refuted by the government.
So, will the DOJ
start proceedings against Judge Fox? Or is the dire warning mere
posturing to try to delay the long-overdue tax revolt? - M. R.
When envoys are sent with compliments in
it is a sign that the enemy wishes for a truce.
Lewis - 1
If you know the enemy and know
you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
If you know yourself but not the enemy,
for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself,
you will succumb in every battle.
Heretics have been hated from the
beginning of recorded time; they have been ostracized, exiled, tortured,
maimed, and butchered; but it has generally proved impossible to smother
them; and when it has not, the society that has succeeded has always
declined. --Judge Learned Hand (1872-1961)
"When even one American -- who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by
fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in
peril." --Harry S. Truman
"I live in Alexandria, Virginia. Near the Supreme Court chamber is a
toll bridge across the Potomac. When in a rush I pay the dollar toll and
get home early. However, I usually drive a free bridge outside the down-
town section of the city, and cross the Potomac on a free bridge. The
bridge was placed outside the downtown Washington D.C. area to serve a
useful social service: getting drivers to drive the extra mile to help
alleviate congestion during rush hour. If I went over the toll bridge and
through the barrier without paying the toll, I would be committing tax
evasion. If, however, I drive the extra mile and drive outside the city
of Washington, I am using a legitimate, logical and suitable method of
tax avoidance, and I am performing a useful social service by doing so.
For my tax evasion, I should be punished. For my tax avoidance, I should
be commended. The tragedy of life today is that so few people know that
the free bridge even exists." " U.S. Supreme Court
Justice Louis D. Brandeis
With No Birth Certificate Or Social Security Number read here
Were you born in Washington,
Were you born in Puerto Rico, Guam,
the U.S. Virgin Islands, or American Samoa?
Are you now permanently living or
working in any one of the areas listed above?
Are you employed by the U.S.
Are you manufacturing or selling
alcohol, tobacco, or firearms?
Are you a naturalized citizen of the
Were you born in one of the 50
states or do you have a Social Security Number and are being asked to pay
If your answers for #1 - 6 are NO and your answer to number 7 is YES, then
you qualify as being an non-taxpayer, i.e.: Tax-Exempt for "individual income tax reporting" for the
rest of your life according to the Constitution and the IRS codes. You are
defined as an American Citizen / a free inhabitant / an American National.
If you answered YES to any of the questions #1 - 6, and your answer for
number 7 is NO, then you are defined as a federal citizen/taxpayer / CITIZEN/TAXPAYER.
NOTICE: The information on this page was
brought to you by people who paid this website forward so
that someone such as you might also profit by having access
to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to
KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank
Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this
page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented
as "Freedom-School.com" - "we," "us" or "our" are other
expressions of Freedom-School.com used throughout. "You" is in
reference to the user / visitor.
This is the fine print that´s so important. Freedom
School material and other information served is so for
educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it
intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere
to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not
"US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or
citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is
Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial
enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented.
Freedom-School.com site relies on this memorandum and
others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged
agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this
website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and
accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good
faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all
[third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC
AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A
SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government,
or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious
and/or political statements appearing on this website are not
factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party
have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that
burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5
U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in
the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national
Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons,
questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations.
Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without
specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed
"frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie
evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything
on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will
be made to correct it in timely fashion upon
Freedom-School.com is not responsible for content of any linked
website or material.
In addition, users may not use Freedom-School.com to
engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone
connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the
network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone´s use and enjoyment of the
All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county
Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent
permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a
part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and
we will replace that part with terms that most closely match
the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this
contract will not change. This is the entire contract between
you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any
prior contract or statements regarding your use of the
Freedom-School.com site. If there exists some manner of thing
missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole
or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may
not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other
person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not
transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any
rights to use the Freedom-School.com site or material contained
Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring,
interception, recording, reading, copying or capturing by
authorized personnel of all activities. There is no right to
privacy in this system. Unauthorized use of this system is
prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties,
including all penalties applicable to willful unauthorized
access. Consider, 18 U.S.Code §1030 - Fraud and related
activity in connection with computers.
GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically
collect personally identifiable information about you when you
visit the Freedom-School.com site, we do collect
non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to
improve our Web site design and our online presence.
using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google
Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of
Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are
using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be
using; your network location and IP address (this can include
geographic data like the country, city and state you are in);
your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the
Freedom-School.com site; the pages you visit on the
Freedom-School.com site; the amount of time you spend on each
page of the Freedom-School.com site and referring site
information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google
Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more
information on Google´s privacy policies, visit: http://www.google.com/privacy/ads/
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works
and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects
information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in
sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual
visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor
interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as
what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has
been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to
the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of
reports about how visitors interact with their website so they
can improve their website and how people find it. A different
cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked
across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites
notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable
this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie
is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a
Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, or work computers´
Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, and/or work computers, make
effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to
respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate
actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and
other applicable intellectual property laws.
If your copyrighted material has been posted on the
Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, or work computers, in other
than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material
are returned through our search engine and you want the
material removed, you must provide a written communication that
details the information listed in the following section. Please
be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs
and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information
listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged
copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact
competent legal assistance on this matter.
The following elements must be included in your copyright
* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of
the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is
allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not
deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact
you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work
claimed to have been infringed and including at least one
search term under which the material appears in
Freedom-School.com search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith
belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is
not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the
* A statement that the information in the notification is
accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining
party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an
exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of
the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being
infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)
Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at
Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that
emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet
Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your
request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint
not being properly being filed.