Tax Mattersall items presented in public interest without prejudice - no liabilty for any use - unauthorized use prohibited.
(Search for hidden messages.)
It is an unconstitutional violation of due process of law for any judge or prosecutor to "presume" that one may be a franchisee called a "taxpayer" without any supporting evidence. All such presumptions also amount to the establishment of a religion by the government, because they amount to a belief that either is not supported by evidence or is not required to be supported by evidence.|
Further, if Federal courts can’t make declaratory judgments relating to federal taxes, then how can they decide that one may be a "taxpayer" who is subject to the franchise agreement to begin with? If they are enjoined from declaring people "taxpayers", then they can’t enforce the franchise agreement against anyone because they can’t determine who is subject to it.
Understand the legal reality, namely that "taxpayer" means "fiduciary" and that has to be asserted at what may be the one and only time to compel "them" judicially to prove up the basis for their purported claim, namely the necessary trust agreement on which their claim depends.
Ye say, "Yea!" or say, "Nay"?
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. — VOLTAIRE
"Nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands... "
These are the words of
Judge Learned Hand (1872-1961), Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals in the case of Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F.2d 809, 810 (2d Cir. 1934), aff´d, 293 U.S. 465, 55 S.Ct. 266, 79 L.Ed. 596 (1935)
Anyone may arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; He is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury; There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.
Over and over again courts have said there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible, everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right; for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands. (f) Taxes are an enforceable extraction, and not a voluntary contribution. (Emphasis added.)
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. —Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
"The laws of Congress in respect to those matters [Federal Income Taxation] do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government."
Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211, 215, 14 S. Ct. 513 (1894)
Are You One Required To File IRS 1040 Forms?
Concerning the the first income tax of 1861
- - - Nations are destroyed by politicians promising something for nothing. - - -
Rahm Emanuel Doesn´t Pay Taxes, So
Why Should You?
41 Obama White House aides owe the IRS $831,000 in back taxes --
and they´re not alone
Why pay taxes...
"Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talks of the sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile... Once a nation parts with the control of its credit, it matters not who makes the laws... Usury once in control will wreck the nation."
--William Lyon Mackenzie King PC OM CMG (1874-12-17 – 1950-07-22) the tenth Prime Minister of Canada
A man or woman cannot cling to anything...
VIDEO: IRS Commissioner Dodges Income Tax Question
Title 31 U.S.C.
Sec. 321 General authority of the Secretary - ANNOTATED
...from 1998 IRS Oversight Hearings:
"Our system of taxation is dependent on taxpayers´ belief..."
Lindsey Springer: Problems you and I face
are not about ...
Background Check Of The IRS
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus
A few facts about U.S.
MERRILL M.E. JENKINS, SR. M.R.: I.R.S. Indicted For
Fraud & Extortion
READ - STUDY - LEARN:
According to the Internal Revenue Manual (dated 07/27/98):
Part 5, Collection Activity
(1) Our system of taxation is dependent on taxpayers´ belief that the tax laws they follow apply to everyone and that the Internal Revenue Service will respect and protect their rights under the law. These are fundamental principles of voluntary compliance.
(Emphasis added - above curiously missing from current issue.) Are you a believer in voluntary compliance? Laws are mandatory on [those] the subjects of them. Compliance is only voluntary where it is not mandatory. Think about that for a while.
F.Y.I.: As it appears, the IRS has no jurisdiction to apply their ´special laws´ for the District of Columbia over American Nationals [nonresident alien non-individuals] who derive no income that is effectively connected with the conduct of ´the performance of the functions of a public office´ [trade or business as defined at 26 USC §7701(a)(26)] within the ´District of Columbia´ [the United States as defined at 26 USC §7408(d)] or participate in any federal franchise scheme.
The Internal Revenue Service is the National Government´s tax bill collection bureau. The statutory laws it operates under are found in Title 26 of the United States Code. This is also referenced as the IRC or Internal Revenue Code. The IRC statutes were created by Congress.
The only group that the IRS is authorized to deal with are those identified in 26 USC §7701(a)(14) to be ´Taxpayers´. The IRC shows that the term ´taxpayer´ means any person subject to any internal revenue tax. There is no issue with their authority to address ´Taxpayers´ but one needs to understand that their statutory laws are applicable only toward those who are ´Taxpayers´ or just as commonly the IRS uses the term "U.S. persons" as ´Taxpayers´.
As stated in the federal court case Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F.2d, 585 (1972)
"Revenue laws relate to ´taxpayers´ [legal fictions created by the Congress, officers, employees, certain U.S. citizens, resident aliens, elected officials of the national government, and those who operate in a representative capacity in behalf of the national government such as via a federal franchise established by the Social Security Act of 1935 by being engaged in the conduct and performance of the functions of a public office called a ´trade or business´ within the District of Columbia referenced as ´the United States´] and NOT to ´Non Taxpayers´ [American Nationals a.k.a., non-resident alien non-individuals who have no physical or statutory domicile within the District of Columbia and do not derive any income from being engaged in the conduct of a trade or business within the District of Columbia].
The latter are without their scope of revenue laws. No procedures are prescribed for non-taxpayers and no attempt is made to annul any of their Rights or Remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws."
[Emphasis & Clarifications added]
Interesting ...as received from the Secretary of State of Texas: certification
All warfare is based on deception.
If ´they´ lie, mislead, misspeak, misdirect you from the judge´s bench, what makes you think the pastor/priest/rabbi doesn´t do the same from their pulpit?
Someone say, "Misrepresentation"?
What manner of "employee" might you be?
Consider U.S. v. Bass, 784 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1986), the trial judge instructed Bass´s jury that Bass qualified as an "employee" relevant to chapter 24 of the IRC just because he was a commonly-defined employee. However, Bass never disputed being a commonly-defined employee; he simply argued that he was not a statutorily-defined "employee" and said that whether he qualified as the latter was a matter for the government to try to prove and his jury to decide. The 5th circuit said, "You betcha´!" and reversed Bass´s nine-count conviction.
"We have a single system, and in that system the only question is the price at which the proletariat is to be bought and sold, the bread and circuses." "The whole fabric of society will go to wrack if we really lay hands of reform on our rotten institutions. From top to bottom the whole system is a fraud, all of us know it, laborers and capitalists alike, and all of us are consenting parties to it." -- Henry Adams
Nord Davis: Pardon Me
Legal Notice to Correct Fraudulent Tax Status Reporting, and Withholding
Estoppel Activated against IRS and U.S. Dept. of the Treasury
Supreme Law Introductory Reading List
A Brief Introduction To The Fascinating Truth
About The Income Tax
On-line quiz: Why are you obligated to pay income tax? How You Become Liable for the Income Tax
Vern Holland THE LAW THAT ALWAYS WAS
31 Questions and Answers about the IRS
The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue
Debunking IRS Lies
"The Federal Income Tax Scam"
Taxing Your Beliefs
Fifteen commonly held BELIEFS that MOST Americans BELIEVE to be "
true for a fact"
Posted by Bentley
Are You Paying Too Much?
Not withholding taxes?
New IRS Bounty Programs Pays CPAs Even If They Deliberately Cause Their Clients to Owe Tax,
Penalties & Interest & Lie to the Clients.
Toil, Taxes and Trouble - Discover Vivien Kellems as presented by Devvy Kidd. Also
AUDIO: Interview with Phil Hart, Author of "
Schulz v. IRS
Memo from former CIR Coleman Andrews
admitting that Bureau of Internal Revenue not created by law
Letter from former Congressman Pat Danner
admitting that IRS not created by law
Letter from IRS
attempting to claim IRS has been created by law
Administrative History Of The Bureau Of Internal Revenue
"The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collections.
They relate to taxpayers and NOT to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope.
No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul any of their Rights and remedies in due course of law. With them [nontaxpayers] Congress does not assume to deal,
and they [nontaxpayers] are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws."
Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236, at 238 (1922)
Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S., 470 F.2d 585, at 589 (1972). (Emphasis added.)(more quotes)
"The Internal Revune Code is not positive law, it is special law."
Irwin Schiff´s material is presented for informational purposes only - reader is advised to use any of the material at one´s own risk.
Irwin Schiff: The Great Income Tax Hoax
The Biggest Con
Kingdom of Moltz
Irwin Schiff: How an Economy Grows and Why It Doesn´t
a pictorial introduction to basic economics.
The Schiff Trial What Everyone Should Know
VIDEO: Secrets of Living an Income Tax-Free Life
Irwin speaks out on the war
Constitution Society´s Tax Matters
William L. Avery: Dispatch of Merchants
The Pennsylvania Estate and Trust Cybrary
It is only one who is thoroughly acquainted with the evils of war that can thoroughly understand the profitable way of carrying it on.
William Cooper: PUBLIC JUDICIAL NOTICE Part 1
The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue
An Investigation Into The Meaning Of The Term UNITED STATES
Sedition By Syntax
Al Thompson: Internal Revenue Laws Were Repealed
Why an Income Tax is Not Necessary to Fund the U.S. Government
Laugenour´s Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts
Determination of Taxable Income
DEFINITION OF "FEDERALLY PRIVILEGED WORKER"
Is Anyone Required To Have A Social Security Number?
Social Security "Wards"
Researchers: Social Security Numbers Can Be Guessed
IRS INCOME: BLOOD MONEY
Feds want employers to voluntarily check Social Security numbers "Gee, is that check voluntary or mandatory?
If the Government Owns a Third of Your Labor, Are You Free?
Federal Income Tax Page as found on Original Intent who´s objective is "Restoring the Republic...one Citizen at a time"
Zero Out The Account
Why It is Illegal to Request or Use a Taxpayer Identification Number
The Becraft Landmark Case: U.S. V. LLOYD R. LONG
The story that appeared in the "Independence Newspaper" January 1994
U.S. v. Lloyd R. Long: Federal District court in Tennessee, case NO. CR-1-93-91. Complete transcript.
Decoding The IRS´ Individual Master File By Albert J. Wagner. C.P.A.
Obtaining And Analyzing the IRS Individual Master File (IMF)
Notes on PERSON
Who Is Liable for Federal Income Tax?
What´s Really Taking Place in a "Willful Failure to File" Trial Anyhow?
ON DEFENDING OUR TAX EXEMPT WAGES PURPOSE: REPORT
What To Present Administratively That You Have No Income
R U a Taxpayer or an authorized agent?
Stop by your local IRS office, bring some ID, and request a "Record of Account" for the "Taxpayer"
its free and it contains what they are aware of.
Transcript: Mel´s "Bar & Grill" broadcast on Sunday, 27th of July 2008, www.wwfar.com, featuring
...no prince is ever benefited by making himself hated.
12 U.S.C. Sec. 411 01/23/00|
TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER 3 - FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
SUBCHAPTER XII - FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES
Sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation redemption
Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank. [Bold emphasis added.]
The Federal Reserve System: Its Purposes And Functions
Federal Reserve Districts
Populist lawyer, Gary Fielder, presents:
The Gig Is Up: Money, the
Federal Reserve and You
The Commercial Credit System
Definitions of a dollar from various sources.
Preacher/Shepherd Wakes His Flock
very informative and MOST IMPRESSIVE (Needed caveat, Freedom School applauds well done presentations of topics that are worthy of attention such as this one - and while we applaud one it doesn´t mean that we applaud all that flows from any particular individual - such is the case with this presenter.)
Federal Reserve Notes Not Legal Tender
The Twilight of Irredeemable Debt By Professor Antal E. Fekete
Billions for Bankers, Debts for the People
Paul Grignon´s 47-minute animated presentation of "Money as Debt" tells in very simple and effective graphic terms what money is and how it is being created. It is an entertaining way to get the message out. Money As Debt
for more visit: www.moneyasdebt.net/
"The few who understand the system will either be so interested from it´s profits or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class." -- Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
The Money Scam
AUDIO: George Green on the Economy
Definitions have always been a point of contention when dealing with government agencies, the courts, and especially lawyers. The classic example is President Clinton, during his impeachment trial, stating, "...it depends on what you mean by is." Fortunately, government definitions are usually available somewhere in the documentation they are using or referring too. Also, some of the definitions used by the IRS have been judicially resolved. With that in mind, take a look at the following terms:
- The term "United States" means Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands and other "owned" territories of the U.S.
- The term "State" (capitalized) means one of those places listed above.
- The term "state" (not capitalized) refers to one of the 50 states or another country.
- The word "income" does not mean wages, tips, salaries, and other compensation for labor according to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Also see Black’s Law Dictionary. Income is the "returnv in money from using your capital to make money, i.e., profits and interest. Even then it must be earned in the corporate United States.
- The term "includes" means ONLY those items or places which are specifically listed after the word "includes". IT DOES NOT MEAN items or places not listed. See, INCLUDES
Open a bank account? (Use at own risk.)|
- Have available or obtain a form of identification (for example, passport, driver license, etc.) with no social security number.
- Take a witness with you and two copies of the Constructive Notice
- Go to a bank where you are not known.
- Indicate that you want to open a non-interest-bearing account.
- Indicate that you do not wish to provide a social security number or taxpayer identification number and that, according to the Privacy Act, it is illegal to demand one. If necessary, ask that the bank representative consult their supervisor or legal department.
- If the bank representative still refuses to open the account, fill out both copies of the Constructive Notice, signed by both you and your witness.
- Hand one of the copies to the bank representative.
- If the bank representative still refuses to open the account, then find a lawyer to sue the bank representative personally, as well as the bank.
Open an account at ANY bank
without using SSN
Bank Accounts Without A Social Security Number read here
Position on SSN Requirement
word doc Constructive Notice
For anyone asking for your SSN. It is very powerful.
It puts the recipient on Notice that they are in violation of the law and can be held liable for damages.
Legal Notice and Warning
F.Y.I.: Ohio Attorney General Recommends Employers
Discontinue Usage Of SSN´s As Identification
F.Y.I.: Who needs a Social Security Number? Consent Decree from EEOC vs. Information Systems Consulting, Dallas, Texas
(Do you have a religious objection to using SSN?)
EMPLOYER LETTER TO EMPLOYEES ENDING WITHHOLDING
This is a form to use
when you are doing contract work or for an employer to let them off the hook for not getting a Socialist Security Number
And one may need this form as well
The filing of a withholding agreement (W-4 or W-9) is voluntary [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)]
The voluntary withholding agreement may be terminated at any time by the worker or the hiring entity [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)(2)]
The Consequences of
Thinking about being an employee - one may need this form
New Hire Paperwork Attachment
IN GENERAL, one may need this form as well
Legal Notice and Warning
This is preferred form to use
*learn about W-8BEN here
LETTER TO EMPLOYER REQUESTING ACCURATE/CORRECTED
SAMPLE: FOIA Strategy
Internal Revenue Service is only authorized to collect an Income Tax from corporations.
"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but the individuals´ Right to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed." Corn v. Fort, 95 S.W.2d 620 (1936)
READ & LEARN:
Due Process Violation
Did someone say, "Due Process"
A.L.E.R.T. No. 1999-07-19
America Becomes a Two-Class Society
Background & Study Material:
Towards comprehending the Communist Manifesto
Entitlement Benefits And The 6th Commandment
Walter E. Williams:
Taxes and Voting
Commentary - Walter E. Williams:
Forget stimulus package -- cut taxes
Not familiar with the Form W-8BEN?
Information as found in IRS´s Instructions for Form W-8BEN (2/2006)
"Nonresident alien individual. Any individual who is not a citizen or resident alien of the United States is a nonresident alien individual. An alien individual meeting either the "green card test" or the "substantial presence test" for the calendar year is a resident alien. Any person not meeting either test is a nonresident alien individual. Additionally, an alien individual who is a resident of a foreign country under the residence article of an income tax treaty, or an alien individual who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or American Samoa is a nonresident alien individual. See Pub. 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens, for more information on resident and nonresident alien status."
DISCUSSION: A key word here is "individual" - in common language might be presumed to be an [individual] man or woman; Title 26 defines the word differently and it is not what one might think; see section # 3. Check it out for yourself. Familiarize yourself with the information found in the New Hire Paperwork Attachment Also, do you have a ´green card´ or "substantial presence" within the [corporate] United States? Are you a "resident" anywhere?
See also, About Form W-8BEN
One does need to know just who one is or one may be presumed and taken for whatever someone else wants that one to be.
Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status. See Form 13.008
Living without a bank:
Fees and confusion galore
|Title 26 C.F.R. Sec. 31.3402|
|Title 26 C.F.R. Sec. 31.3402(p)-1 Voluntary withholding agreements.|
(a) In general. An employee and his employer may enter into an agreement under section 3402(b) to provide for the withholding of income tax upon payments of amounts described in paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 31.3401(a)-3, made after December 31, 1970.
(b) Form and duration of agreement. (1)(I) Except as provided in subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph, an employee who desires to enter into an agreement under section 3402(p) shall furnish his employer with Form W-4 (withholding exemption certificate) executed in accordance with the provisions of section 3402(f) and the regulations thereunder. The furnishing of such Form W-4 shall constitute a request for withholding.
(c) A statement that the employee desires withholding of Federal income tax, and applicable, of qualified State individual income tax (see paragraph (d)(3)(I) of Sec. 301.6361-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedures and Administration)), and (d) If the employee desires that the agreement terminate on a specific date, the date of termination of the agreement. If accepted by the employer as provided in subdivision (iii) of this subparagraph, the request shall be attached to, and constitute part of, the employee´s Form W-4. An employee who furnishes his employer a request for withholding under this subdivision shall also furnish such employer with Form W-4 if such employee does not already have a Form W-4 in effect with such employer. (iii) No request for withholding under section 3402(p) shall be effective as an agreement between an employer and an employee until the employer accepts the request by commencing to withhold from the amounts with respect to which the request was made. (2) An agreement under section 3402 (p) shall be effective for such period as the employer and employee mutually agree upon.
However, either the employer or the employee may terminate the agreement prior to the end of such period by furnishing a signed written notice to the other. Unless the employer and employee agree to an earlier termination date, the notice shall be effective with respect to the first payment of an amount in respect of which the agreement is in effect which is made on or after the first ``status determination date´´ (January 1, May 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year) that occurs at least 30 days after the date on which the notice is furnished. If the employee executes a new Form W-4, the request upon which an agreement under section 3402 (p) is based shall be attached to, and constitute a part of, such new Form W-4.
One may need this form
Thinking about being an employee - one may need this form
New Hire Paperwork Attachment
It is unlawful to terminate or not hire you for failure to provide an IRS Form W-4 or W-9; (see DOJ Form I-9; or 8 U.S.C. §1324a(b), §1324a(b)(2); or Privacy Act of 5 U.S.C. Annotated §552(a).)
Who/what is a slave?
Slavery Using Franchises
But the state lies in all the tongues of good and evil;
and whatever it says it lies;
and whatever it has it has stolen.
"Me, I´m competent to make informed decisions."
WhatisTaxed.com - Data-Mining the Tax Code - What is Tax
The filing of a withholding agreement (W-4 or W-9) is voluntary [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)].
A voluntary withholding agreement may be terminated at any time by the worker or the hiring entity [26 CFR 31.3402(p)-1(b)(2)].
Me, I am not aware of any section of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) or its enabling regulations that requires me, an individual American NOT involved in a revenue-taxable activity, a non-taxpayer, to file a Form 1040 or pay [so-called] 'income taxes'.
Index of topics concerning Internal Revenue Service
FREE ONLINE TAX COURSE for those who qualify...
TREASURY DEPARTMENT ORDERS: DELEGATION ORDERS: T.D.s have no force or effect of law on the general public.
Read to know: § 6321 Lien for taxes
A Notice Of Levy Is Not A Levy
If they are different, they can not be the same!
"IRS Form 668-W ... does not provide authority to levy wages of private citizens in the private sector."
See, Member of Congress, Dennis M. Hertal´s letter
"The taxpayer must be liable for the tax. Tax liability is a condition precedent to the demand. Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability".
Boathe v. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, at 1414 (1983)
Credit Reporting Agencies and Notice Of Levy
Dealing with IRS "Notices" of Lien and Levy
Reference Material concerning levy
The U.S. Supreme Court said in Thatcher v. Powell, 19 U.S. 119, 6 Wheat. 119 (1821) that no public officer can take any action affecting your property ""unless authorized so to do by express law, "and that the person invested with such a power, must pursue with precision the course prescribed by law, or his act is invalid""
Court Rulings Strike At Authority To Levy
Dear Member of Congress:
Are you aware that the IRS can take property from people without a court order?
Are you aware that governments cannot exercise powers the people do not have and hence cannot grant to governments?
Can one conclude, therefore, that if the IRS has the "right" to take property without a court order, it is because [originally] the Citizens also have such a right?
Then the question is, if the IRS can take property without a court order, how does an average Citizen go about doing the same thing?
As you may also be aware, using the Courts to deprive others of property is expensive and [seemingly] takes forever.
Any information that can be supplied on how to avoid lengthy court battles [and thereby lessen judicial burden], and use mere letters, like IRS´s notices of lien and notices of levy will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your thoughtful and timely response.
IRS Suffers Staggering Defeat
SILVER, GOLD AND THE IRS By Derry Brownfield
Concerning Notice of Levy for Employer
Liens and Levies
Tax Lien Fraud See how deep does the rabbit hole goes
Third Party Checklist for Determining Validity of Notice of Levy
26 C.F.R. §301.6331-1 Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes
Sec. 301.6331-1 Levy and distraint.
How to stop the IRS with Debt Collection statutes
Diversified Metal Products v. T-Bow Co. Trust
How can the IRS use Form 4340 as evidence to make you liable for tax?
Seven Elements Of Jurisdiction
IRS ~ Tax Info
Everything in the state is false;
it bites with stolen teeth, and bites often.
It is false down to its bowels.
Citizen action in Oregon
part 1 (zip file)
part 2 (zip file)
Jim Shaver Shut Down the Fraud!
Discover and set about correcting erroneous information in the Individual Master File (IMF)
State is the name of the coldest of all cold monsters.
Coldly it lies; and this lie slips from its mouth:
"I, the state, am the people."
The Information Return Scam
Towards a better understanding of a taxing situation...
...on the 16th amendment
Bill Benson The Law That Never Was
See also, United States v. Benson
7th Circuit Opinion
Government Benefit Scam
Phil Hart: Constitutional Income:
Do You Have Any
F.Y.I.: Congress defines the term "taxpayer" at 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(14) as "any person subject to any internal revenue tax." What is a "internal revenue tax" one may ask? Notice "internal revenue tax" is not found defined anywhere in the tax codes of the United States or anyplace else.
Hey Mr. IRS TAXMAN; Tax Code §§ 1402(b), 3121(e) 3306(j), and 42 U.S.C. § 411(b)(2), define "citizen" and they do not mention me - an American, and after a diligent search I find there is no statute that mentions my citizenship as a subject of the Tax Code. if anything, I’m only named in regulation 26 CFR 1.1-1 by the U.S. Treasury. This appears to violate the 16th Amendment that you guys seem to rely on which says that only Congress may lay and collect income taxes. Now, how say you?
Hey Mr. IRS TAXMAN; after a diligent search I find I find that § 83 of your Tax Code is violated when the value of my personal services is taxed as gross income, because, I find, only "the excess over the amount paid" is gross income. Now, how say you?
Where the People fear the Government - you have tyranny;
Where the Government fears the People - you have rights.
Concerning a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien"
Court cases concerning (Form 668-W) Notice of Levy
Me, I am not aware of any such CIVP "Kind of Tax(a)" as showing.
I am aware that the IRS can only issue a levy and relating "Notice of Levy" against federal employees 26 U.S.C. § 6331(a) without implementing regulations, as required by, 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(2), 26 C.F.R. § 601.702(a)(1), 31 C.F.R. § 1.3(a)(4), and 44 U.S.C. § 1505(a)(1). I find nothing that goes to "John H Doe" being a federal employee.
The Notice of Levy Form, Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Form 668-Y(c), does not appear to have a valid OMB Control number. It is my belief that, under the provisions of the Paperwork reduction Act (PRA), this form may only be used within the government and may NOT be issued to the general public. The general public is also told in the act that such a form may safely be disregarded and is "bogus" if issued without a valid OMB control number. That said and as it stands, I find the "Notice" item so said above to be bogus.
Please take notice that neither a Federal Tax Lien or a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien" cannot and should not be issued until an Abstract of Judgment, which is signed by the clerk of the court summarizing a judgment that was duly signed by a judge, is firstly obtained by the IRS. As respondent, I am not in possession of nor aware of any such Abstract.
I rely on this, "Our system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment and payment, not distraint." as found in Flora v. U.S., 362 U.S. 145 (1960).
I am aware of and do rely on this, a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien", IRS Form 668(Y)(c) issued without an accompanying "Abstract of Judgment" cannot and should not be honored by the recipient. Any recipient who does honor it is opening themselves up to civil liability and a tort. This includes county records, title companies, attorneys, etc. Federal law cannot and does not protect parties who engage in such tortious activities because federal law has NOT JURISDICTION within states of the Union.
I am aware of and do rely on this, "Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid." as found in Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 297 (1904).
I am aware of and do rely on this, that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), codified in 15 U.S.C., Chapter 41, Subchapter V, also requires that all imputed debts, whether tax related or otherwise, MUST be validated with the original debt instrument upon demand of the [alleged] debtor within 30 days. This Act requires in 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a), among other things, that the debt collection has an obligation to validate any imputed debts. Tax debts constitute "debts" for the purposes of this provision, and section 3466 of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 makes the IRS Subject to the Provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
"Me, I don´t accept this offer."
"Me, I don´t consent to this ...."
Information concerning tax lien (first page is blank)
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera: Information concerning a tax lien
Ever had IRS correspondence from a "R.A. Mitchell"? Then you may be interested in THIS
You have no contract with
the IRS unless ...
26 C.F.R. §
Jim Carter: LIBERTY -- YOUR RIGHT TO
MAKE A LIVING
Someone say, "fiduciary"?
How the IRS traps you into liability by
making you a fiduciary for a dead "strawman"
Meet Your Strawman!
Notice: 26 C.F.R. §301.7701-6 Definitions; person, fiduciary.
Notice concerning fiduciary relationship
Discover IRS Form 56 click here
Example Form 521 Request For Withdrawl
- - - Students are encouraged to be familiar with items and able to intelligently discuss them BEFORE use.- - -
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they will be filled. --Matthew 5:6
Internal Revenue Service Restructuring And Reform Act Of
Administrative Procedure Act
"NOTICE: For purposes of this and relating communication the terms "Frivolous" and "Meritless" shall mean truthful, accurate, and consistent with prevailing law and legal precedent."
Frivolous Return Fraud
Frivolous Return Filer
IRS and Due Process
Frivolous Penaly Ref.
A Motion in Limine
NO PRESUMPTION OF LIABILITY
The United States is a
Little Known Facts
Are you a citizen of the United States / US CITIZEN / TAXPAYER?
F.Y.I.: "Slater´s protestations to the effect that he derives no benefit from the United States government have no bearing on his legal obligation to pay income taxes. ... Unless the defendant can establish that he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS possesses authority to attempt to determine his federal tax liability."
U.S. v. Slater, 545 F.Supp 179, 182 (1982)
Dennis Leroy Parizek, EIN 29-61699
I want to express my thanks to the IRS for the professional, lawful, timely, quick, and efficient processing of so said Form 1040NR for the so said year 2004 mentioned in your Letter 3176(SC))(Rev.7-2007) dated January 12, 2008, as received.
The 1040 is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief -- please refer to the signed jurat, and the signed jurat on the attached Form 4852.
Please take notice that I am not a "Taxpayer" and kindly stop addressing me as such.
For purposes of this and relating communication the terms "Frivolous" and "Meritless" shall mean truthful, accurate, and consistent with prevailing law and legal precedent.
Your offer of contract is being returned to you unsigned and without recourse.
May I remind you of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant; and 26 U.S.C. § 7214. Offenses by officers and employees of the United States; and 18 U.S.C. § 872. Extortion by officers or employees of the United States; and 18 U.S.C. § 876. Mailing threatening communications. I hope you are not willing to participate or perpetrate any of these offenses.
This letter and any and all relating or attaching documents and reply may become part of the Public Record and will be used for and as competent evidence in any administrative or judicial proceedings at law, or equity as may occur regarding this issue. ALL of these documents must be maintained in Claimant´s Administrative File.
TITLE 5 > PART I > CHAPTER 7 >
§ 702. Right of review
Remedy for $500 Penalty
Chuck Conces, December 6, 2007
Notice Of Fraud
The "Willful Failure to File" Scam!
A Report On Tax Exempt
Wages And Salaries
Data Relative to Withholding Provisions of the 1942 Revenue Act
If you´ve relied on prior decisions...
It is not now nor has it ever been my intention...
Let´s all get this straight. I am NOT a tax protester!
Items you may have missed...
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER PUBLISHES
PATRIOT HIT LIST
Tax Protester Dossiers
IRS Continues to Use 'Tax Protester' Label Despite Congressional Prohibition
Treasury Decision 2313
|Recipient does not have a voluntary withholding agreement in place, and therefore does not earn "wages" as legally defined under 26 C.F.R. §31.3401(a)-3(a).|
|The amounts reported on the W-2 should not have been reported at all, and even if a form had been sent in, Block 1 of the W-2 (wages, tips, and other compensation) should have been zero.|
|Me, I am a "nonresident alien" not engaged in "trade or business" as defined in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26) with no earnings from the "United States" and defined in 26 C.F.R. §1.871-1(b)(i) whose estate is a "foreign estate" as per 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(31) and who is specifically exempted from receipt of "gross income", not subject to withholding, backup withholding, and reporting as per the following: 26 U.S.C. §861(a)(3)(C)(i), 26 U.S.C. §1402(b), 26 U.S.C. §3401(a)(6), 26 U.S.C. §3406(g), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(a)(6)-1(b), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(g)-1(e), 26 C.F.R. §1.872-2(f). Further, I am not an Title 26 "individual" and I am domiciled and work outside the United States and outside of federal jurisdiction and therefore not subject to Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code and not required to make any gross income reports. 26 U.S.C. 864(b)(1)(A) says that my (private) earnings are not reportable or taxable. [See F.R.Crim.P., Rule 1(9) "State". See also, Legal Basis for the Term "Nonresident Alien"]|
Signature Without Liability Primer|
"Those who benefit from any societal mechanism rarely wish to understand that mechanism, especially if it appears to grant them authority over their fellow man and understanding that mechanism would limit, diminish, or remove that apparent power of control or authority. They simply do not want to know, because it is far easier to ignorantly control others than it is to wisely control yourself." -- Robert Arthur Menard
William Wallace Lear´s matter - served for information purposes only.
Public Constructive Notice
Challenge of Authority
Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports Authority, 535 U.S. 743 (2002)
Robert A. McNeil´s matter - served for information purposes only.
Robert A. McNeil vs Internal Revenue Service
Motivation, Awareness & Desire
foundation of right action
|Someone say, Wesley Snipes?|
Wesley Snipes to Go on Trial in Tax Case|
Wesley Snipes Cleared of Serious Tax Charges
Wesley Snipes Indicted - October 17, 2006
Original NY Times article
Full Text of Wesley Snipes´ Anti-Tax Statement
New York Times Blog
Wesley Snipes Tax Trial
More propaganda "In denial: Why file tax returns?"
Well, it seems that the federal extortion machine won´t be hanging one of their most prizes trophy heads on the wall just yet. A judge has granted Wesley Snipes bail pending appeal, which means he stays out while his conviction is appealed, which could take a year or two, or more.
On Failure To File & Liability For Income Tax
Amicus Curiae Brief
Snipes gets the max -- 3 years --
in tax case
A note about the recent "conviction"
of Wesley Snipes on income tax charges
|Title 4 United States Code|
- § 71. Permanent seat of Government
- All that part of the territory of the United States included within the present limits of the District of Columbia shall be the permanent seat of government of the United States.
- § 72. Public offices; at seat of Government
- All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.
Statute requires that the Secretary of the Treasury have express lawful authority to operate outside of D.C., and it is under that Office that the IRS operates. Tax Code § 7621 is not that permission. This authority to operate does not exist, at least no denial of this by the DOJ is made in federal court.
"Gee, Mr. IRS agent, are you even allowed to talk to me?"
Who are you?
Center for Constitutional Rights
If an Agent Knocks
Statement Of Facts And Beliefs Regarding IRS
An actual encounter with an agent...
| What To Do When
The IRS Comes Knocking
IRS AS PRIVATE CORPORATION
CHRYSLER CORP. v. BROWN, 441 U.S. 281 (1979) [ Footnote 23 ] "There was virtually no Washington bureaucracy created by the Act of July 1, 1862, ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432, the statute to which the present Internal Revenue Service can be traced."
BURDEN PLACED ON PERSONS DEALING WITH AGENT
In Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, the Supreme Court ruled: "Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rulemaking power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority. See, e.g., Utah Power #& Light Co. v. United States, 243 U. S. 389, 409; United States v. Stewart, 311 U. S. 60, 70, and see generally 74 U. S. 7 Wall. 666." Federal Crop Ins. Corp v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947).
Continental Casualty Co. v. United States, 113 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1940): "Public officers are merely the agents of the public, whose powers and authority are defined and limited by law. Any act without the scope of the authority so defined does not bind the principal, and all persons dealing with such agents are charged with knowledge of the extent of their authority," 113 F.2d, at 286.
Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981): "Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation," 644 F.2d, at 1383.
> > > [See public servant questionnaire] < < <
Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 650 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1981): "All persons in the United States are chargeable with knowledge of the Statutes-at-Large * * * [I]t is well established that anyone who deals with the government assumes the risk that the agent acting in the government´s behalf has exceeded the bounds of his authority," 650 F.2d, at 1100.
Research the United States Statutes-at-Large - The Acts of Congress, 1917-Present
THE HIDDEN MEANING OF THE 1040 INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RETURN
Memorandum: Dan Meador, Federal Tax Law Administration & Enforcement
Habitude of Malfeasance
In re Benny, 29 B.R. 754, 762 (N.D. Cal. 1983): "[A]n unlawful or unauthorized exercise of power does not become legitimated or authorized by reason of habitude." See also, Umpleby, by and through Umpleby v. State, 347 N.W.2d 156, 161 (N.D. 1984).
habitude ( ha(b´ i(-tu-d´, -tyu-d´ )
n. A habitual tendency or way of behaving. See synonyms at habit.
[Middle English, from Latin habitu-do-, condition, from habitus. See habit.]
Social Security number code cracked,
Secrets Of The Social Security Number
Voluntary Nature of Social Security
What Social Security Isn’t Meant to Do
Social Security FOIA Request
Steve Miller: Social Security:
Mark of the Beast!
Entitlement Benefits And The
Relating to Social Security - recinding one´s signature:
Consider that it is not possible for you to vrescind" ‘your’ vSocial Security numberv.
First of all the "Social Security number" is not "yoursv so you cannot rescind it.
If one does not believe that their signature was/is valid, why would they attempt to rescind it?
The only thing [an attempt of] rescinding a contractual obligation does is to prove the person’s signature on the contract/instrument. (Technically, both parties need to agree to the recinding action.)
One can consider rejecting [not participating in] any and all benefits regarding a particular contract
Discover the terms, "negation", "abandoned."
F.Y.I.: The EIN for the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION is 52-6004813
(See also, this page)
SAMPLE: Social Security
F.Y.I.: The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, United States
Phone: (410) 965-0003
Line of Business:Administrative Social/Manpower Programs
Detailed Social Security Administration Company Profile
This company profile is for the PRIVATE COMPANY Social Security Administration, headquarters located in Baltimore, MD. Social Security Administration´s line of business is administrative social/manpower programs.
Year Started: 1974
Contact Name: Patricia Gross
Contact Title: Secretary
(Data above provided by Dunn & Bradstreet)
IRS Publication 515 (Hint: read the first two pages.)
Lindsey K. Springer:
Dr. Clarkson´s site
W4 Withholding Program
The term "employee" 31 CFR §215.2(h)(1)(i) does not include retired personnel, pensioners, annuitants, or similar beneficiaries of the Federal Government, who are NOT performing active civilian service or persons receiving remuneration for services on a contract-fee basis. They are not subject to withholding and have no duty to file any form W-4 or W-9, unless they desire to voluntarily enter into agreements.
Larry Becraft Blocks Another DOJ Persecution: Good news from Hawaii;
NOTICE: not for the faint of heart, The
IRS vs. Robert Kahre
Relating To Income Taxes
| 26 C.F.R. §301.6109-1(g) |
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 18]
[Revised as of April 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
(g) Special rules for taxpayer identifying numbers issued to foreign
persons--(1) General rule--(i) Social security number. A social security
number is generally identified in the records and database of the
Internal Revenue Service as a number belonging to a U.S. citizen or
resident alien individual. A person may establish a different status for
the number by providing proof of foreign status with the Internal
Revenue Service under such procedures as the Internal Revenue Service
shall prescribe, including the use of a form as the Internal Revenue
Service may specify. Upon accepting an individual as a nonresident alien
individual, the Internal Revenue Service will assign this status to the
individual´s social security number. [Enlarge and Bold emphasis added.]
Some sample letters:
Social Security Administration
Worker Opt-out Form
Private Sector Worker
122108 - IRS abuse letter
Facts about 501c3 tax-exempt status
for the church
ARE YOU WORRIED THE IRS IS GOING TO
COME AFTER YOU?
Regarding Nonconsenual Taking From Pay,
and other issues
Me, I am a non-taxpayer, a "nonresident alien" not engaged in a "trade or business" with no earnings from the "United States" and defined in 26 C.F.R. §1.871-1(b)(i) whose estate is a "foreign estate" as per 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(31) and who is specifically exempted from receipt of "gross income", not subject to withholding, backup withholding, and reporting as per the following: 26 U.S.C. §861(a)(3)(C)(i), 26 U.S.C. §1402(b), 26 U.S.C. §3401(a)(6), 26 U.S.C. §3406(g), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(a)(6)-1(b), 26 C.F.R. §31.3406(g)-1(e), 26 C.F.R. §1.872-2(f); further, I am not a Title 26 "individual".
Details on the status of being a "nonresident alien"
What we could get back from the IRS
IRS sending out millions of alerts
How to challenge alleged
IRS agent authority
What The Government
Search Results: irs
|Item found posted on Michael Rivera´s WhatReallyHappened.com: April 2008 Archives|
DOJ Announces National Tax Defier Initiative
Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department´s Tax Division, announced the creation of the National Tax Defier Initiative or TAXDEF. The purpose of this initiative is to reaffirm and reinvigorate the Tax Division´s commitment to investigate, pursue and, where appropriate, prosecute those who take concrete action to defy and deny the fundamental validity of the tax laws. ...
I imagine that King George III said something very similar back in 1775.
Frankly, reading between the lines of the language used, it appears that tax defiance has become a huge problem, probably far larger than the government wants to admit. Indeed, I view this announcement as an admission that the problem has grown to vast proportions.
Now then, let us see how serious the DOJ is in
punishing, persecuting, threatening, enlightening those who claim the income tax is in fact illegal. Here is a PDF file of the court transcript from Sullivan v. USA. On page 23, Judge James C. Fox clearly states that the 16th Amendment was not properly ratified, a claim repeated by many other tax law experts and never successfully refuted by the government.
So, will the DOJ start proceedings against Judge Fox? Or is the dire warning mere posturing to try to delay the long-overdue tax revolt? - M. R.
|Transcript Of Nathan J. Hochman
|Department of Injustice Press Release,
IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (Training Supplement/Desk Guide)
Tax Protest Scams
|ON TAX EXEMPT WAGES AND SALARIES, A
Withholding and Reporting
NOTICE: (to IRS)
For purposes of this and relating communication the terms "Frivolous" and "Meritless" shall mean truthful, accurate, and consistent with prevailing law and legal precedent.
Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status. See Form 13.008
Social Security Tax And Tax Withholding Are
Tax Basics 101
Whose Earnings Are Income
Indianapolis Baptist Temple - The Trumpet: Pastors Must Be
Ordained By The IRS
Follow the adventures of
William and Karen Greene
Read - Study - Learn:
USA v. Seth Sundberg (comments)
Motion To Dismiss Indictment For
Failure To Charge An Offense
Hovind v. Commissioner
LARGEST IRS REFUND IN U.S. HISTORY
He who exercises no forethought but makes light of his opponents
is sure to be captured by them.
Other learning opportunities...
Independent Referral Services
Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM)
Path to Freedom Document
TECHNIQUES FOR BUILDING A GOOD
Summons To Produce
Books and Records
How to challenge
alleged IRS agent authority
HANDLING AND GETTING COLLECTION
DUE PROCESS HEARINGS
When envoys are sent with compliments in their mouths,
it is a sign that the enemy wishes for a truce.
Lewis - 1
If you know the enemy and know yourself,
you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
If you know yourself but not the enemy,
for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself,
you will succumb in every battle.
|Information concerning one Ed Rivera|
Heretics have been hated from the beginning of recorded time; they have been ostracized, exiled, tortured, maimed, and butchered; but it has generally proved impossible to smother them; and when it has not, the society that has succeeded has always declined.
--Judge Learned Hand (1872-1961)
"When even one American -- who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril." --Harry S. Truman
"I live in Alexandria, Virginia. Near the Supreme Court chamber is a toll bridge across the Potomac. When in a rush I pay the dollar toll and get home early. However, I usually drive a free bridge outside the down- town section of the city, and cross the Potomac on a free bridge. The bridge was placed outside the downtown Washington D.C. area to serve a useful social service: getting drivers to drive the extra mile to help alleviate congestion during rush hour. If I went over the toll bridge and through the barrier without paying the toll, I would be committing tax evasion. If, however, I drive the extra mile and drive outside the city of Washington, I am using a legitimate, logical and suitable method of tax avoidance, and I am performing a useful social service by doing so. For my tax evasion, I should be punished. For my tax avoidance, I should be commended. The tragedy of life today is that so few people know that the free bridge even exists." " U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
Baby With No Birth Certificate Or Social Security Number read here
- Were you born in Washington, D.C.?
- Were you born in Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or American Samoa?
- Are you now permanently living or working in any one of the areas listed above?
- Are you employed by the U.S. Government?
- Are you manufacturing or selling alcohol, tobacco, or firearms?
- Are you a naturalized citizen of the United States?
- Were you born in one of the 50 states or do you have a Social Security Number and are being asked to pay income taxes?
If your answers for #1 - 6 are NO and your answer to number 7 is YES, then you qualify as Tax-Exempt for "individual income tax reporting" for the rest of your life according to the Constitution and the IRS codes. You are defined as an American Citizen / American National.
If you answered YES to any of the questions #1 - 6, and your answer for number 7 is NO, then you are defined as a federal citizen/taxpayer.
Did someone say, "F.O.I.A."?
GAO: Freedom of Information Act
resource page :)
Bureau of Public Debt
26 CFR 601.702
SOURCE A /
5 U.S.C. § 552 SOURCEA
/ SOURCE B
5 U.S.C. § 552a
Opposition to Motion for Dismissal
(FOIA - FBI)
"I move to strike everything after "defendant" as unresponsive, irrelevant, incompetent, immaterial, and prejudicial."
"I believe that the prosecution is exhibiting bias, prejudice, interest, incompetence, or corruption - how say this Court?"
|NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you.