Selected court cases and cites...

(presented in no particular order)

The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 870 S.W.2d 21, 23 (Tex. 1994)

"The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collections.
They relate to taxpayers and NOT to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope.
No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul any of their Rights and remedies in due course of law. With them [nontaxpayers] Congress does not assume to deal,
and they [nontaxpayers] are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws."
Long v. Rasmussen Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236, at 238 (1922)
Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S.  Economy Plumbing and Heating v. U.S., 470 F.2d 585, at 589 (1972).
 (Emphasis added.)(more quotes)

On sovereignty:  YICK WO v. HOPKINS, 118 U.S. 356

A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution  MURDOCK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)

"The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States." TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700

The Radinsky Case

Crandall v. State of Nevada Crandall v. State of Nevada,  73 US 35 formerly 6 Wall 35 1867

United States v. Guest, 383 US 745 United States v. Guest, 383 US 745; Justice Harlan on the  right to travel

Kemper vs. State  Kemper vs. State

TexDOT v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636; 1999 Tex. "...governmental immunity from suit defeats a trial court's subject matter jurisdiction..." 
TexDOT v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636; 1999 Tex.

WEBB COUNTY v. SANDOVAL "...Webb County, Texas ("Webb County") appeals the trial court's order denying its plea to the jurisdiction based upon sovereign immunity..."  WEBB COUNTY v. SANDOVAL, 126 S.W.3d 264; 2003 Tex.

Dondi Properties a great cite for reforming Attorney practice  Dondi Properties

Judge Christopher A. Boyko's opinion and order IN RE FORECLOSURE CASES; Judge Christopher A. Boyko's  opinion and order

STATE ex rel. McNAMEE et al. v.  STOBIE if the matter is penal, then the matter is commercial  STATE ex rel. McNAMEE et al. v. STOBIE

 case on money  Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood

Saldana v. State Saldana v. State 109 S.W.3d 4 (2002)

Safety Casualty Co. v. McGee  Safety Casualty Co. v. McGee

United States Court of Federal Claims Case, Beres v. United States Beres v. United States

42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 action  42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 action

United States v. Guest  United States v. Guest

United States v. Moran  United States v. Moran, interesting case on exclusion of testimony

Ex Parte — Frank Knowles  Ex Parte — Frank Knowles   /   in .rtf

The Dred Scott Case  The Dred Scott Case

Pealman v. Reliance Insurance Co., 371 U.S 132 (1962)  Pealman v. Reliance Insurance Co., 371 U.S 132 (1962), case involving rights of a surety.

(mortgage service companies benefit from foreclosures - pay particular note of paragraphs 49 ~ 59.)

 One must be taken before a magistrate  Gerstein v. Pugh

Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.,  322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250, 1944, interesting case on...

United States v. Salman  United States v. Salman No. 05-10093. Albert R. Salman appeals his convictions for two counts of passing a fictitious financial instrument, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 514(a)(2), and two counts of attempting corruptly to interfere with the administration of the internal revenue laws, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a).

Lucas v. Earl

SCREWS v. U.S., 325 U.S. 91 (1945) Concerning TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242  SCREWS v. U.S., 325 U.S. 91 (1945)

BRIDGEFORTH v. BRONSON Concerning Fourth Amendment, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1983, and more... 
[see section: D. Qualified Immunity]

Nordyke v. King Concerning the Second Amendment:  Nordyke v. King

Trezevant v. City of Tampa Trezevant v. City of Tampa,  741 F.2d 336

Valiant Liberty: The United States of America is no longer a Nation 
Montoya v. United States 180 U.S. 261; also contains Ansley v. Ainsworth, 180 U.S. 253

Hawaii Carpenters´ Trust Funds v. Stone, 794 F.2d 508, 513 (9th Cir. 1986)
wherein the Ninth Circuit upheld the entry of default against a delinquent subcontractor after the subcontractor failed to fulfill his obligations under a settlement agreement, failed to file an answer and refused to pay the trust funds’ attorney’s fees and costs, which was a condition of the trial court to set aside the default.

Wrongful Death: Day v. State of Utah, 741 F.2d 336

Concerning ´willfulness´, supreme Court ruling in US v. Cheek

Hiibel v. Nevada  Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada 542 U.S. 177, (2004)

 Brown v. Texas  EXCERPT


Someone say, "...research sites please."?

The largest free collection of federal district court case law.

Search the  Legal Dictionary

Legal Research  Sources


District Court's Jurisdiction  District Court's Jurisdiction

NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.
More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related items Belligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
AntiShyster MagazineVideo
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented as "" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of used throughout. "You" is in reference to the user / visitor.

This is the fine print that so important. Freedom School and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented. site relies on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.

The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone's use and enjoyment of the website.

All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the site or material contained within.

GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit the site, we do collect non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to improve our Web site design and our online presence.
Visitors to this site who have Javascript enabled are tracked using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be using; your network location and IP address (this can include geographic data like the country, city and state you are in); your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the site; the pages you visit on the site; the amount of time you spend on each page of the site and referring site information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more information on Google's privacy policies, visit:
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of reports about how visitors interact with their website so they can improve their website and how people find it. A different cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites that use it must update their privacy policy to include a notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a case-by-case basis."

Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2023
All Rights Reserved