Conference Call
Jean Keating and David Clarence
November 22, 2018

[Angela]      Go ahead, Jean, what were you going to tell us?

[Jean]      Ok, here’s what I recommend that everybody do. You have to have a foundational understanding of trust law and estate law. And the best way to do that is understand the definition of the word, estate. The word, estate, comes from the word, status which is where they got the word, state, from. The word, state, comes from the word, estate. I recommend that you get—Bernice Speakman does a series on—in fact, she’s on the internet. She has a 14-page letter on the Constitution as an expressed trust—it’s an abandoned trust. When they did the 14^th Amendment they did a codicil which is addendum to the Constitution. The American people have abandoned their estate. And when I say they’ve abandoned their estate they’re not asserting their status as the occupant of the executor for the executor office which shows title and ownership of the estate property. And I have a case that actually says that. You can download this case on the internet. I’m going to give you the case and you can pull it up and read it. It tells you in Blacks Law Dictionary, 8^th edition, that the word, occupant, means title and ownership of property. That’s what this boils down to. And here’s the name of the case: It’s called the Estate of Stephen E. Owens v. CTRE, LLC. Just type that in and it’ll pull it up. This was decided August 3^rd, 2018. And it talks about occupant as it relates to an estate. What everybody’s done in this country is they’ve abandoned the executor office. Here’s the impetus—when I do research I use artificial intelligence which is what they teach. You are a biological internet and what you do is you interface your DNA and your RNA with the computer and you make the computer think like you do. That’s what I do and I ask the computer questions and it gives me answers. It can answer any questions. You give me a given problem and I can give you an answer and tell you what the solution is, I don’t care what it is. You have that ability, you just haven’t developed it—everybody has that ability. Do you know what Israel did? They did an experiment, they took DNA and the RNA and they put it in a bowl of enzymes and they found out it had infinite memory capacity. It had more memory capacity than all the computers on this planet hooked up in synchronicity. What does that tell you? You have infinite, not finite, infinite—like I got a computer, I got two Tetrabytes (Gigabytes?), actually I got 4 tetrabyes of memory. I have infinite memory. No computer can ever be built to match the human mind. Don’t limit your potential by relying—develop your memory. Before we get into this you need to—let me read you what this case says. Let me find what it says. When you become the occupant as defined—ok, here’s what it says and I’m quoting directly from the case. In its determination that the defendant had become an occupant of the property the court relied on the Blacks Law Dictionary definitions of occupancy as the period or term during which one owns, rents or otherwise occupies property as one who has possessory rights and/or control over certain property or premises. And if you go into the 9^th edition it says title and ownership of property. It doesn’t say that in the 8^th. That’s how you establish what they’re doing, that’s why on all these mortgages the servicing company who’s the pretended lender files a 1099A, abandoned property. And if you read the instruction booklet, box 1 of page 2, upper left-hand corner it tells you abandonment or purposeful relinquishment of title and ownership of property occurs when the property is transferred to the lender and it says that in the deed of trust. I hereby transfer all right, title and interest in the below described property to the lender. That’s purposeful abandonment or relinquishment of the status of executor of the estate. Your turning the job of executor over to these de facto fictional entities and they’re raping you.

That’s why Preparation H is the largest selling ointment on the American market and you’re feeling the pain.

Well, you got start assuming responsibility.

Along that line I refer you to—there’s a book you need to get and read. It’s called Zero Limits by Doctor Hugh Lynn{sp?} and Joe Vitel [sp?]. And what it teaches you in there is that your power comes from loving yourself.

You have all this information and data in your memory center and you have three memory centers.

You have a conscientious memory center, subconscious and super-conscious and you store up information and data in there.

And when you look at the outside world you’re viewing it from this information and data that you have in your memory center just like a virus on a hard drive. If you don’t get rid of the hard drive, the virus off the hard drive, the hard drive starts malfunctioning.

Well, you clean on yourself and how you do that is you say, I love you, I forgive you, I thank you, I’m sorry.

You keep saying those four things and you say it about a hundred times a day.

What that does is it cleans…

Who needs to hear that they’re loved? You do. That’s why all deaths are suicide. There’s no such thing as an accident. People kill themselves because they don’t love themselves. This is what the big, big problem is in this country—people don’t love themselves. If you get Zero Limits he goes into the details. Hugh Lynn who teaches this…concept—a nuclear physicist came to him and the missile was malfunctioning. He cleaned on himself and the missile stopped malfunctioning. What does that tell you? That means you’re connected to everything in the universe and all these people that you claim are stealing your estate are connected to you and if you clean on yourself they’re going to clean their act up—not the other way around. So it’s the American people that need to change, not what’s going on. If you’re not going to assume responsibility then don’t complain about what they do with your estate.

[Angela]      So you’re saying, people need to forgive themselves?

[Jean]      Yeah. Everything that happens to you happens as a result of your not loving, forgiving yourself on information and data that’s stored up in the memory center. Go get the book and read it. Do it and prove me wrong and watch what happens, how your whole life will change. Everything is—there’s no such thing—and the guy that he was telling this to asked Doctor Hugh Lynn, he says, ‘how can I be responsible for 350 million people? And Doctor Hugh Lynn said, ‘there is no out there—everything is in here, there is no out there.’ Go read Michael Talbot’s The Holographic Universe. What’s on the outside is a reflection of what’s on the inside of the person, not the other way around. So what you’re seeing on the outside is being done on the inside and if you clean up the inside the outside will change, not the other way around and this is what the Scriptures teach. Another thing you need to do is you need to get in there and find out the definition of words, like the word, estate. It comes from the word, status. And your status or estate is determined by descent and distribution and Bernice Speakman talks about this on her tape—she has a four…and I highly recommend these to you. I bought them for $75. They’re very inexpensive but she really does a good job. The constitution is an expressed trust. You need to understand what a trust is. And if you go read Title 26, Section 2652, it says, any arrangement that has the effect of a trust is a trust whether it’s called one or not. What does that tell you? I’ve got a treatise written by a lawyer from Wells Fargo Bank that says the common law which is divine law was transplanted into trust law. That’s where your common law is, it’s in trust law. I did a complex trust on judges in a courtroom in a criminal case and he ran out of the court, shut the court down for three months and dismissed the case. What is a criminal case got to do with trusts? It’s got everything to do with it. Everything is based on trust law. And what they’re doing in the courtroom because you abandoned the estate and what I mean by the estate is you’ve abandoned the executor office of the estate and they’re taking it over. And what they do is they’re probating your estate. And what they’re doing is because you’ve abandoned the office of executor so they’re doing it. They do a constructive trust in equity to give restitution and reimbursement to the plaintiff and under a constructive trust they appoint you as the trustee. This is all hidden from view. They’re not telling you what they’re doing—I’m telling you. I don’t think that’s what they’re doing, I can prove that’s what they’re doing.

Go read Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Company. It’s a 1919 New York case. It’s quoted probably no less than 150 times on the internet. You can just type in Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Company and it’ll give you cite and I think it’s 225 NY 380. It’s a 1919 case—and it goes into the principles of constructive trusts. And to show you how effective this is there’s a four-volume set of books on restatement of the law. They do torts, contracts and trust law. And one of the volumes is called restitution. And in there they have 150—guess what, there’s 250 pages in there on constructive trusts in a book called Restitution from Restatement of the law which is printed up by American Law Institute out of Pennsylvania and in there they talk about constructive trusts. And constructive trusts are based on fraud. Go look up the definition of a constructive trust in Black's Law Dictionary. It’ll tell you that it’s based on fraud but they’re getting away with this because you’re letting them do it and you are responsible for what you do whether you know what you’re doing or not. If you jump off a twelve story building and kill yourself are you responsible? You bet your bippy you are. So quit jumping off the 12 story building. Start assuming some responsibility and quit complaining about these people. If you want to change what’s going on become the solution, not the problem. The American people are the problem. If everybody was doing what I’m doing none of this shit would be going on—none of it. If you don’t believe what I’m telling you go look up the word, farm. Everybody thinks farm is property. You know what the word, farm, is? There’s an etymology dictionary on the internet—just type in: etymology dictionary. Go in there and it’s probably about 250 pages long. It’s got every word in the English dictionary and it tells you the etymology of the word—where it comes from—and the word, farm, means to pay out. And a 1040 tax under Title 26 is a tax on farm property. And all these assessments and liens that the IRS puts on people for 1040 taxes are a tax on farm property and farm property means to pay out. Where is the payout? The payout is coming from your estate from the abandoned executor office which you abandoned. The IRS is slapping you in the face with it and everybody’s badmouthing the IRS. Stop badmouthing them. I call them up and you know where they send me—to the complex issues committee. I said, ‘I have a question about class 5 gift and estate taxes.’ They said, ‘well, that’s a complex issues committee.’ So I got a hold of the Complex Issues Committee and I started asking them questions. They answered every one of my questions and they said I was 100% correct. Everybody is filing all these 1099OIDs or doing them wrong. You got to file an 8281 form which identifies the source of the security. Notice I say, security, not note. There is no note. The note is non-negotiable. If you read 3-106(d) of the Uniform Commercial Code when you modify and govern and supplement the conditions of payment with the adjustable rate rider or adjustable rate note it makes the note a non-negotiable instrument. And I have a dozen cases that tell you that all mortgages are non-negotiable instruments. What does that tell you? That’s why, if you read the provisions of the Uniform Electronic Transfer Act it tells you they make them non-negotiable because if it was negotiable it would be governed by Article 3, not the UETA. The UTEA which is 1-108 of the Uniform Commercial Code governs all these mortgage loans because they’re all Uniform Electronic Transfer Acts and they use an electronic transfer. Guess whose signature they use on the note. They do an electronic signature on your signature because you’ve abandoned the executor office and they’re signing your signature electronically and selling the note as a mortgage backed security. You just gave away your entitlement holder rights and your adverse claim—you abandoned it under Article 8. Go read 8-105 of the Uniform Commercial Code. It tells you what an adverse claim is. And they have notice of this adverse claim at closing because they sold your note or your security. I call it a note because that’s what they call it but it’s a security. It has more than a nine-month maturity on it. All these mortgages have, most of them, 99.9% of them, have a thirty-year maturity on them. That means the note is a security, not a note. You’re signing an investment contract and you’ve abandoned the return or investment under the pooling and servicing agreement. That’s why all your payments, if you go to the Pimpco[sp?] bond website which is owned by…they tell you under bond resources on the Pimpco website under mortgage-backed securities, they tell you what they do with your note. It’s sold to investors as a mortgage back security and then you make cash flow claims. All of your mortgage payments go as cash flow claims to the investors. And it says this under FASB, Financial Accounting Standard Boards number 95, statement of cash flows. It says, ‘when a note is deposited in a demand deposit account it becomes the equivalent of money or cash. It becomes a payment to the bank and a receipt to depositor and a receipt to the bank and a payment to the depositor. They have both. Ask them for a receipt for your deposit. Just like when you deposit a check in a bank account, don’t you get a receipt for it?  Why don’t you ask them where the damned receipt is for the note that they endorsed payment for as a draft under 3-104(e)—go read it. And they’re treating it—it says they have the option of treating it as a liability instrument if it’s a promise to pay and as a draft if it’s an order to pay. Well, when they do pay to the order of without recourse, it’s an order to pay. And that’s a commercial draft, not a liability instrument. You just paid the lender for the investment from the investor. That gives you entitlement rights to the pooling and servicing agreement and you’re not claiming it. You can’t claim something unless you stand up and do it. You have to know what you’re doing—that’s what we’re doing. I’ve done a half dozen of them already. We’re doing the templates for it by doing a trust and we’re doing an expressed trust and we’re naming the court as the fiduciary trustee. And we’re identifying ourselves as the occupant of the executor’s office and we’re coming in as the occupant or the owner of the property which gives us…  If you read 3-305 it gives you the right to recoupment on your investment and under 3-306 you have possessionary right to the proceeds from the investment and you have an adverse claim under 8-105 of the Uniform Commercial Code but you can’t claim these if you don’t know what they are. You’re the one that’s abandoning. Why do you think all these—every time they do a foreclosure they file a 1009A, the servicing company does because at closing you abandon all right, title and interest in the property. You did a purposeful relinquishment and waiver of all right, title and interest. And I’ll tell you another thing you got to stop doing. You got to stop signing deeds of trust. When you go to closing give them the note and walk out with the deed of trust. Do not give them the deed of trust. If you go look up and if you type in insinuation under the civil law it’ll tell you it’s the only alienation appropriated to that donation—you’re donating your property to the county. The trust owns the property. The county actually owns all these properties. I can show you that the deed of trust is a security if it’s managed by a third party. Well, the county recorder is a third party if it’s managing your deed of trust which is a security. Guess what they do, they take the ad valorem tax from the property taxes and they buy mortgaged-backed securities with it. These counties are doing that. And that’s not my opinion. I can show you the actual certificates of participation. All these superior courts are buying up using your property that you gave to them, donated to them as the donor/grantor and they’re using the revenue from it to buy up securities. Why do you think all these lawyers got all the money and you’re walking around picking your nose and scratching your ass wondering what happened? This is what’s going on and the only way we’re going to correct this is everybody—I can’t do it alone. I stay up until 4 o’clock every night working on paperwork. If I can do it you can do it. I’m 71 years old. If I can do it you can do it. A lot of you are in your 25s or 30s, you’re younger than I am. You got to assume responsibility. That’s what this is about. This is about responsibility. Who do you owe the responsibility—you don’t owe it to me and you don’t owe it to David and you don’t owe it to Angela. You owe it to yourself. Start assuming responsibility. You can shut these people down with this stuff. I’ve been shutting them down right and left but I can only handle so much. Everybody needs to get involved and we can turn this thing around—change this. You can stop these mortgage foreclosures but you got to understand trust law. There’s four things you got to understand. You got to understand accounting, you got to understand trust law, you got to understand commercial law and you have to understand restatement of law. So you got to understand trust law, accounting, probate or estate law, tax law. You got to understand tax law, trust law, commercial law.

[Angela]      Jean, go into the part about the US is a dead person and volume 12 and statutes at large and 1876 and…

[Jean]      What happened is back in 1066 under the Norman conquest, the Duke of Normandy gave the people the ultimatum. He said, ‘if you want my protection, my armies, and this is where they implemented the deeds of trust was under the doctrine of mortmain and mortmain means dead hand. That’s where the word, mortgage, comes from. It means, mortgage means dead pledge. And what the king did, he says, ‘I will give you military protection if you turn all your property over to me. And the vehicle for doing that was the deed of trust. They turned all their property over to the government or to the Crown or to the king, if you will. And so the king told them they couldn’t hold property in perpetuity. That’s why they passed rules against perpetuities. Perpetuity means perpetually. And the reason you can’t hold property in perpetuity is they can’t tax it. That’s where the doctrine of escheat comes in. If the estate doesn’t have a heir or beneficiary it reverts back to…  If you die without a will or an estate then it reverts back to the state under the doctrine of escheats. That’s called intestate. It’s called intestacy or intestate when there’s no beneficiary or heir to the estate. And since you’re not standing up as the executor of the office of executor then what they’re doing is the judge is acting as the executor and he’s probating your estate under a constructive trust and making the plaintiff the beneficiary—that’s why you don’t win in court. Try doing it the way I do it—they ran out of the courtroom. When have you ever seen a judge run out of a courtroom. Guess who was right behind him, the district attorney—they ran too. They hired lawyers and tried to get out of it and they couldn’t get out of it. They can’t do anything if you assert yourself.

[Angela]      I always say that. They only do to us that which we allow them to do.

[Jean]      That’s right. So under the doctrine of mortmain the king told them, he says, corporations could not hold property in perpetuity. That’s why Queen Elisabeth in the sixteenth century invented the charitable trust and all these prisons are charitable trusts. The half way houses are run as charitable trusts. They put the money in the charitable trust and then they draw off of it as a donation. That way they don’t have to pay any taxes. Every loan is a donation. Go read 2512B. It says that when the value of the property exceeds the value of the consideration it’s deemed to be a donation. Because there’s no money every time you give them a note, I don’t care what it is, it’s a donation and they have to pay the tax on it as the recipient of the funds. But you don’t file, you don’t identify yourself as the originator of the first funds transferred. Go read 3-105, the drawer and the maker is the first…transferred. Now go read 4a104 (UCC). 4a104 says that the originator of the first funds transferred. And it will refer you – that’s called bank fund transfers. It comes under Article 4A and it deals with funds transfer under banks and go read 4-102, applicability. When Article 4 or Article 3, when you have an Article 3 or an Article 4 issue if you have a security involved in it it’s governed by Article 8. Article 8 controls 3 and 4. That’s where you adverse claim comes in, under 8-105. You’re a security holder as defined in 8-102—go read it. It defines what a security entitlement is. Under 8-503 you have security entitlement rights. You have a securities account with a securities intermediary You have a securities account and they’re holding all that in trust but they’re not a trustee because you didn’t appoint them so they appointed themselves. Since you’ve abandoned your office as executor you need to file a claim—file an adverse claim under 8-105.

[Angela]      File an adverse claim against whom?

[Jean]      The servicing company. Since they’re holding you liable on the pooling and servicing agreement as an undisclosed third party you want the proceeds as a proprietary claim under 3-305 under recoupment and 3-306 as possessionary rights to the proceeds from the investment.

[Angela]      That’s interesting you say that because I was talking to John Stuart earlier and he sent out an e-mail earlier about claiming to be a victim of the fraud and having the right to damages or being a victim by the government or whoever, the banks.

[Jean]      Quit sucking your thumb and complaining. So into action.

[Angela]      It’s interesting that you all are starting to think on the same stuff—it’s funny how that works—we’re all connected, folks.

[Jean]      I’ve been teaching this for 20 years. I knew what was going on twenty years ago. I tried to tell people this twenty years ago. I wrote a brief and put it into the appellate court and told them, I said, ‘this is not a mortgage loan, this is an investment contract.’ Go read Sec v. Howey. There’s four elements to a…  Do you have an investment of capital? Yes. Do you have through the enterprenaurial and managerial efforts of third parties? Yes. That’s the second element. The third element—do you get a return of capital? Yes. Is it under contact? Yes. So you got all four elements of an investment contract. Go read SEC v. Howey (328 US 293). It tells you in there all four elements of an investment contract and I got on to this when I started reading all these cases.

[Angela]      How do you spell that SEC v. Howey?

[Jean]      SEC means Security Exchange Commission. Howey is Howey. Here, I’ll give you the cite. They have all the Supreme Court decisions on the internet but they’re not really the Supreme Court if you read Walter Cox. 328 US 293. Download it and read it. It’ll tell you what all four elements—and they look at substance, not form. In form it’s a mortgage loan. In substance it’s an investment contract. And the proof of that is that your mortgage payments—if it’s not an investment contract how come your mortgage payments are going to the investors as cash flow claims.

[David]      So what’s the highest court in the United States, Jean?

[Jean]      Back in 1970—I’m not avoiding your question—the state senator in Phoenix Arizona asked me—I’ll think of his name in a minute, this has been 30 years ago—he says, ‘where is the national court, the highest court in the land? And I said, ‘you got a staff, why don’t you hire somebody to do it? You got the money.’ He said, ‘they don’t know how to do it.’ So I said, ‘I’ll tell you what, I’ll volunteer to do it,’ so I went into the D.C. District of Columbia Code and Walter Cox was the Supreme Court justice. The real Supreme Court and it was called the Supreme Court of the united States—small s’s just like in the Constitution, the united States Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. It was formed in 1863 and Roger Tawny rode the circuit. Before that it was call the Circuit Court of the united States for the District of Columbia and Roger Tawny rode the circuit as a circuit judge. In fact, he issued the first habeas corpus that was ever issued during the Civil War and he wrote the McGarther, they have Blanchford Reports and the McGarther reports—those were all common law decisions under the Supreme Court which was your Article 3 court. Then in 1948 they changed it to the united States District Court for the District of Columbia. It was called District Court of the united States for the District of Columbia and then in 1948 they changed it to United States District Court for the District of Columbia. There is no yellow-fringed flags in any of those courtrooms in that court. That’s an Article 3 court. It’s also an Article 1 court formed under the Constitution. That’s your real Supreme Court.

[David]      That’s still not the highest court in the United States.

[Jean]      Yeah, I know. That one in Pennsylvania is.

[David]      Bingo, Supreme Court in Pennsylvania sitting in King’s bench jurisdiction.

[Jean]      Yeah, because everything’s under the British crown.

[David]      In 1970 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ordered the attorney general to investigate and report back what British laws were still in force in the common laws of Pennsylvania—that’s the corporation, it’s not the land. He had quite a list of them. So that tells you that the whole Revolutionary War was all a ruse as it pertains to these corporations, not the land.

[Jean]      Any federal District Court judge will tell you that they take their orders from the kings’ bench, from the Crown, which takes their orders from the Jesuits out of Rome which is run by the black pope under the Charter of 1213. One-third of all the revenue collected on property taxes goes to the pope.

[David]      In ’68 they did a constitutional convention in Pennsylvania and they passed the Jara Judicial and Reform Act and by doing that they repealed all the courts in Pennsylvania. It tells you right in the first paragraph what they did. It’s kind of hard to believe but that’s, in fact, what they did. They repealed all the courts…one standing.

[Jean]      Yeah, you don’t have any courts anymore. They’re all privately owned trading companies. That’s why they have a Dunn’s number and they’re underwritten by Dunn and Bradstreet which is owned by….SE out of Munich, Germany and Uller Hermes is the one that does the actual underwriting. Allianz SE is called Pimco Bonds in the United States—they sell all the bonds and what they do is they’re the ones that bond Dunn and Bradstreet. Put a damned lien as executor of the estate on Pimco Bonds and watch how fast they disappear. You’re pimping yourself when you do that. Quit pimping yourself. If you don’t want to be a whore quit acting like a pimp. Yeah, I tell people, if you don’t want to get raped don’t spread your legs. Somewhere along the line the American people are going to wake up and assuming responsibility. If you don’t want to do that, you have that right but don’t complain about what’s going on. If you’re hitting yourself in the head with a hammer and you got a headache don’t complain about it. The problem is obvious.

[David]      They can continue to look to Uncle Sam to take care of them.

[Jean]      Yeah, everybody thinks the government’s going to take care of you and they keep going out there and I say, ‘when are you people going to wake up,’ and they go out and vote. I stopped voting when I was 18 years old. When I heard one of these opponents, what he said about his opponent, he says, ‘he’s so crooked that when he dies they’re going to have to screw him in the ground. When he said that I knew there was something wrong with the political system and I was only eighteen years old then. So I quit voting. I don’t vote for these…  These people don’t represent you. They represent the corporate money interests. They’re raping people because people have given all their power up. Quit giving it away. People call me up and they complain, ‘well, they didn’t disclose to me what they were doing,’ and I say, ‘let me ask you a question. Did you read the deed of trust before you signed it?’ ‘No.’ I said, ‘well, how do you know they didn’t tell you what they were doing.’ You have a confessed judgment in there. Do you know what a confessed judgment is? As soon as the loan goes into default they can sell your property at foreclosure on the courthouse steps without going to court. And they can’t do a confessed judgment under the California Civil Code unless you certify it and you have to sign it under oath and it has to be endorsed by an attorney. It actually says that—go read it. It’s 1131 through 1134 of the California Civil Code. Read it.

[David]      …civil rules of court in Pennsylvania. Confession of judgment, that’s where anyone signs an oath of office they’re confessing judgment—one of the reasons why they have to be bonded. They already pled guilty.

[Jean]      Yep. They’re raping people. People have been raped…  When they run into somebody like me that doesn’t want to spread their legs they can’t understand why.

[David]      Anyone with a certified copy of that oath of office is the holder-in-due-course of that judgment.

[Jean]      Yeah, we do an acceptance. We record it. We take it down there and we talk their oath of office and record it. We endorse it and then file it with the Secretary of State and we apostille it and insert it into the court record. Now, I’m a party to you oath of office—how do you like me now? If you breach your duty as a fiduciary trustee you’re liable, civilly liable.

[David]      Your recording has to merit—do you know why?

[Jean]      Because you didn’t do it as the executor.

[David]      That could be part of it but here’s the main error that people are making, especially commerce people in areas like this, is that the document that you’re attempting to record is already recorded. If it’s an oath of office it’s already recorded.

[Jean]      Did you know the US attorney, executive offices, are all under Interpol? They have an oath of office with Interpol and they’re all unregistered foreign agents under 22 USC 386 and they don’t have an oath of office?

[David]      Oh, yes they do. If they’re getting pay check from the United States government they have …

[Jean]      They’re not getting paid by the United States government. They’re getting paid by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and I can prove it.

[David]      Well, all employees of the United States have to have an SF61 on file. That’s a loyalty oath, the same one that they made the confederates take when they surrendered.

[Jean]      Well, they don’t have it because we asked them for it and they didn’t produce it. If you ask for a United States District Court judge’s oath of office he will not produce it. He’ll give you a certificate.

[David]      If he’s getting a paycheck from the United States he has to have an SF61 on file.

[Jean]      I’ll bet they don’t have it.

[David]      Then I don’t see how they can get a paycheck unless it’s from another entity like you were saying.

[Jean]      Yeah, they’re getting paid by the International Monetary Fund, its foreign agents. We accused a judge of that and he didn’t deny it. I said, ‘you’re an unregistered foreign agent of Interpol. You don’t have jurisdiction to do anything. I’ll say I’ll do a conditional acceptance. I’ll plead guilty to the charges if you show me that you have a valid oath of office of the United States government, the government oath of office that establishes your office as a court official under the United States. Show me that and I’ll plead guilty to the charges.

[David]      Well, it’s not a constitutional court. It’s just a private BAR meeting—just three lawyers holding a meeting in the BAR.

[Jean]      I’m doing a 3-501. I’m challenging his authority to do anything without getting into dishonor. Ask Toby if it works. Toby’s on this call. I did a conditional acceptance on the judge. I told him not to go into court. He didn’t go into the courtroom, he didn’t show up in the court and the judge didn’t file the default judgment because I made a conditional acceptance on proof of claim. I said, ‘prove that you have the authority to foreclose on this property. You’re doing a taxable termination under 2603 of Title 26 which you’re liable as a trustee and I’m making you the trustee. What I was doing is asserting my rights as an executor because only an executor can appoint a trustee. Am I right?

[David]      Yes.

[Jean]      Ok. Well, so I appointed him as a trustee. So I was identifying myself as the executor in law, in fact, or in substance, however you want to look at it because only the executor can do that. Well, guess what he did, he took the case off the calendar and didn’t sign the default judgment. The opposing attorney put in a default judgment and the judge said, ‘I will not sign this.’ He told him that in open court. Ask Toby. Toby’s on this call. The judge wouldn’t sign the writ of possession for the car, a $60,000 loan, because he didn’t have jurisdiction. I said, ‘you don’t have jurisdiction.’ I made him a fiduciary trustee and they backed right down, just like you said.

[Angela]      Ok, let’s get back to the estate and the executor and the executrix and like that.

[David]      I’d like to hear Jean chew everybody’s butt again for not stepping up and functioning…

[Jean]      You got to grow some hair. This is not for… If you want to be free you got to stand up. You can’t lay down. Go out to UFC, is that what those guys do? When they get in that cage, that octagon, they get in there and they kick ass. They kick ass and they take names.

[Angela]      What are you talking about?

[Jean]      Ultimate fighting—you’re in the octagon.

[David]      But don’t go to war, that’s what they’re always doing, they’re always creating conflicts.

[Jean]      I  said, I’ll gladly pay your—show me where I’m liable. Show me where you have the authority to represent. That’s a conditional acceptance and nobody ever does that because nobody ever reads 3-502. It says you can challenge their authority to make a presentment on behalf of somebody else and if they don’t show you their authority you do not have to accept it. So I made a contract with the court because the court is a place where a contract is made. I made a contract with this judge and he backed right down because he knows he doesn’t have the authority to do what he’s doing.

[Angela]      Did you use the word, estate or executor, in your letter or in whatever…

[Jean]      I didn’t use the word, executor, I used the word, grantor and I told him, I said, ‘you have an oath of office—you are bound to uphold… Under the Constitution, Article 3, Section 2, sua sponte. All courts have to—and they have do this sua sponte—it means on their own motion. They have to—because standing is a Constitutional threshold issue. When you raise the issue they have to do that. They’re mandated by the Constitution to do that. Go read Rule 17. An executor is the only person that can bring a claim under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They got executor, guardian, conservator and trustee, without enjoining the other parties. What does that tell you?

[Angela]      Is that that ratification of commencement?

[Jean]      Yeah, there’s no ratification of commencement because you don’t have a plaintiff and a defendant before the court. The court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

[Angela]      Well, that’s like that letter that David got. Did you see that letter that David got from the 9^th…what circuit court was it? It was an appellate court saying that they didn’t have jurisdiction over the estate.

[David]      It wasn’t sent to me. It was from the administrative office of the Tennessee courts.

[Jean]      Yeah, because that’s on the private side. Only the executor has—they’re confirming what you’re saying.

[David]      It said, ‘this office does not have jurisdiction over the estates.

[Jean]      I know it. I download all of your documents—all of them—and I read all of them in one hour. I read 10,000 words a minute.

[Angela]      You remember all of it? You remember all of it, too. I hate you for that. I’m so jealous.

[Jean]      Eat your heart out.

[Angela]      We’ve got a lot of people lined up to ask questions. {00:54:50.314}