Just so we can understand how this whole process works, let us look at a court situation such as a traffic violation. Assume you ran through a yellow light and a policeman gave you a traffic ticket.

1) The first thing you want to do is to delay the action at least three weeks. This you can do by being pleasant and cooperative with the officer. Explain to him that you are very busy and ask if he could please set your court appearance for about three weeks away. At this point we need to remember the government's trick: "I'm from the government. I'm here to help you." Now we want to use this same approach with them.

2) The next step is to go to the clerk of the traffic court and say, "I believe it would be helpful if I talk to you, because I want to save the government some money (this will get his attention). I am undoubtedly going to appeal this case. As you know, in an appeal, I have to have a transcript, but the traffic court doesn't have a court reporter. It would be a waste of taxpayer's money to run me through this court and then to have to give me a trial de novo in a court of record. I do need a transcript for appealing, and to save the government some money, maybe you could schedule me to appear in a court of record."

3) When you get into court, the judge will read the charges; driving through a yellow light, for instance, and this is a violation of ordinance XYZ. He will ask, "Do you understand the charge against you?"

4) "Well, Your Honor, there is a question I would like to ask before I can make a plea of innocent or guilty. I think it could be answered if I could put the officer on the stand for a moment and ask him a few short questions. Judge: "I don't see why not. Let's swear the officer in and have him take the stand."

5) "Is this the instrument that you gave me?" (hand him the traffic citation). Officer: "Yes, this is a copy of it. The judge has the other portion of it." "Where did you get my address that you wrote on this citation?" Officer: "Well, I got it from your driver's license."

(Number 4 above is very important to get into the record, clearly stating that you do not understand the charges. With that in the record, the court cannot move forward to judge the facts. This will be covered later on.)

Hand the officer your driver's license. "Is this the document you copied my name and address from?" Officer: "Yes, this is where I got it." "While you've got that in your hand, would you read the signature that's on that license?" (The officer reads the signature) "While you're there, would you read into the record what it says under the signature?" Officer: "It says, 'Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207". Judge: "Let me see that license!" (He looks at it and turns to the officer). "You didn't notice this printing under the signature on this license when you copied his name and address onto the ticket?" Officer: "Oh, no. I was just getting the address. I didn't look down there." Judge" "You're not very observant as an officer. Therefore, I'm afraid I cannot accept your testimony in regards to the facts of this case. This case is dismissed."

6) So, the judge found a convenient way out. He could say that the officer was not observant enough to be a reliable witness. He did not want to admit the real nature of the jurisdiction of his court. Once it was in the record that you had written "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" on your license, the judge knew that he would have to admit that:

a) You had reserved your Common Law rights under the UCC;

b) You had done it sufficiently by writing "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207 on your driver's license.

c) The statute would not have to be read in harmony with the Common Law, and the Common Law says the Statute exists, but there is no injured party; and

d) Since there is no injured party or complaining witness, the court has no jurisdiction under the Common Law.

7) If the judge tries to move ahead and try the facts of the case, then you will want to ask him the following question: "Your Honor, let me understand this correctly. Has this court made a legal determination that it has authority under the jurisdiction that it is operating, to ignore two sections of the Uniform Commercial Code which have been called to its attention?" If he says yes, tell him that you put the court on notice that you will appeal that legal determination, and that if you are damaged by his actions, you will sue him in a Common Law action under the jurisdiction of the UCC. This will work just as well with the Internal Revenue Service. In fact, we can use the UCC with the IRS before we get to court.

If the IRS sends you a Notice of Deficiency, this is called a "presentment" in the Uniform Commercial Code. A "presentment" in the UCC is very similar to the Common Law. First, we must understand just how this works in the Common Law. Suppose I get a man's name from a phone book, someone I have never met, and I send him a bill or invoice on a nice letterhead that says, "For services rendered: $10,000.00." I send this by certified mail at the address taken from the telephone book. The man has to sign for it before he can open it, so I get a receipt that he received it. When he opens it, he finds a bill for $10,000.00 and the following statement: "If you have any questions concerning this bill or the services rendered you have thirty days to make your questions or objections known."

Of course, he has never heard of me, so he just throws the bill away and assumes that I'm confused or crazy. At the end of thirty days, I go to court and get a default judgment against him. He received a bill for $10,000.00, and was given thirty days to respond. He failed to object to it or ask any questions about it. Now, he has defaulted on the bill and I can lawfully collect the $10,000.00. That's Common Law. The UCC works on the same principle. The minute you get a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS, you must return it immediately with a letter that says:

The presentment above is dishonored (Your name) has reserved all of his rights under the Uniform Commercial Code at UCC 1-207. This action should be all that is necessary, as there is nothing more that they can do. In fact, I recently helped someone in Arizona who received a notice of Deficiency. The man sent a letter such as this, dishonoring the "presentment." The IRS wrote back that they could not make a determination at that office, but were turning it over to the Collections Department. A letter was attached from the Collections Department that said they were sorry for the inconvenience they had caused him and that the Notice of Deficiency had been withdrawn. So you see that if it is handled properly, these matters are easily resolved.

On my way here, I had a chance to visit with the Governor of Wyoming. He is very concerned that if he runs for office this November, there won't be a State of Wyoming at the end of four years. He believes that the International Bankers might foreclose on the nation and officially admit that they own the whole world. They could round up everybody in the state capitol building, put them in an internment camp and hold them indefinitely. They may give them a trial, or they may not. They will do whatever they want. As I explained earlier, it has not been convenient to foreclose on the nation, until they could get everything ready. This is where the Federal Emergency Management Agency comes in. It has been put in place without anyone really noticing it.

FEMA, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, has been designed for America when it is officially declared bankrupt. That would be a national emergency. In a national emergency all Constitutional Rights and all law that previously existed, would be suspended. FEMA has created large concentration camps where they will put anyone who might cause trouble for the orderly plan and process of the new regime to take over.

Even a governor could be thrown into one of these internment camps, and kept there indefinitely. The mechanism is all in place now, and FEMA is just waiting to declare a national emergency. Then even state governments could be dissolved. Anybody who might oppose the new regime could be imprisoned until a new set of laws could be written and a new government set up. The Governor knows all this, and he is very concerned. He doesn't want to be in office when all this happens.

When I visited with him and I told him that there are certain actions we should take right now. I think we should consider the fact that, according to the Uniform Commercial Code, Wyoming is an accommodation party to the national debt. In order to understand this statement we must realize that there are two separate entities known as the United States.

NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you.

Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.

Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action. Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.

The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.

Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2023
All Rights Reserved

H O M E