Section 27: The Rothschild Influence Section 28: The Flaw in the Constitution, Two Nations in One Section 29: Are You a United States Citizen? Section 30: Original Intent of the Founders
When America was founded, the Rothschilds were very unhappy
because it was founded on the (Christian) Common Law. The Common Law
is based on substance, and this substance is mentioned in the
Constitution as gold or silver. America is a Constitutional Republic,
a union of the States under the Constitution. When Congress was
working for the Republic, the only thing it could borrow was gold or
silver, and the Rothschild banks did not lend gold or silver.
Naturally, they did not like this new government. The Rothschilds had
a deal with the King of England. He would borrow paper and agree to
repay in gold. But these United States, with their Constitution, were
an obstacle to them, and it was much to the Rothschild's advantage to
get the colonies back under the King. So the Rothschilds financed the
War of 1812 to bring America back under England. Of course, it didn't
work, so they had to find another way. It was around the time of the American Civil War that they
discovered a flaw in the Constitution. The flaw was Article I,
Section 8, Clause 17. Remember ' that there are two nations called
"United States." What is a nation? If you would agree with this
definition: Whenever you have a governing body, having a prescribed
territory containing a body of people. Is that a nation? Yes. We have
a governing body in the Republic, "the three branches of government."
There are the legislative, the executive, and the judicial branches.
There is a prescribed territory containing a body of. people. This is
a Constitutional Republic. But Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 gave Congress, which is the
legislative branch of the three branches government, exclusive rule
over a given territory known as the District of Columbia, containing
a body of people. Here we have a nation within a nation. This is a
legislative democracy within a Constitutional Republic. When Congress was a part of the Constitutional Republic, it had
the obligation of providing a medium of exchange for us. Its duty was
to coin gold or silver. Anyone who had a piece of gold or silver
could bring it in and have it freely minted into coin. This was the
medium of exchange for the Republic. But, in the Legislative
Democracy (over Washington D.C.), Congress is not limited by the
Constitution. Congress has exclusive rule over the District of
Columbia. The legislators can make the law by a majority vote, and
that makes it a democracy; they have the authority to have
administrative agents to enforce their own law; and they have courts
in the legislative branch of government, to try their own law. Here
we have the legislature making the law, enforcing the law and trying
the law, all within the one branch of government. This is a
one-branch government within a three branch government. Under the three-branch government, Congress passes law which has
to be in harmony with the Constitution. The executive enforces the
law passed by the Congress, and the judiciary tries the law, pursuant
to the Constitution. The Three-branch Constitutional Republic, and the One-branch
legislative democracy are both called the United States. One is the
federal United States, and the other is the continental United
States. If you say that you are a United States citizen, which United
States are you referring to? Anyone who lives in the District of Columbia is a United States
citizen. The remaining population in the fifty states is the national
citizenry of the nation. We are domiciled in various sovereign
states, protected by the constitutions of those states from a direct
rule of Congress over us. In the democracy, anyone who lives in those
states known as Washington D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico, or any of the
other federally held territories is a citizen of the United States
(D.C.). We must be careful with our choice of words: we are not citizens
of the United States. We are not subject to Congress. Congress has
exclusive rule over a given territory, and we are not part of that
territory. Where did Congress get the authority to write the Internal
Revenue Code? It is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the
Constitution. To pass that law, they only needed a majority vote.
There is no other way that they could p ass laws directly affecting
individuals. Title 26, the Internal Revenue code, was passed as law
for another nation (remember our definition of 'nation'), but Tide 26
is not consistent with the Bill of Rights. If you try to fight the
IRS, you have no rights-the Code does not allow you any of your
constitutional rights. It simply says, "You failed to file an income
tax form. You failed to perform in some specific manner." Remember, under the Common Law, you are free to do whatever you
want, as long as you do not infringe upon the life, liberty, or
property of anyone else. If you do not want to Perform, you don't
have to. The only way you can be compelled to perform under the
Constitution in the continental United States, is when you have
entered a contract and have failed and fulfill our obligations. But
if you are not under a contract you can not be compelled to perform.
How can you be compelled to file an income tax form, or any form? You
can't! When Congress works for the Republic, every law it passes must be
in harmony with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but when
Congress works for the Legislative Democracy, any law it passes
becomes the law of the land (remember, Congress has exclusive
legislative control over federal territory). If you are charged with
willful failure to file an income tax 1040 form, that is a law for a
different nation. You are a nonresident alien to that nation. It is a
foreign corporation to you. It is not the Republic of the continental
United States coming after you, it is a foreign nation, a legislative
democracy of a foreign nation coming after you. If you get a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS, it is a
presentment from the federal United States, and then you can use the
UCC to dishonor it, and you can also mention that you are among the
national citizen of continental United States, and you are a
nonresident alien to the federal United States. You never lived in a
federal territory and never had any income from the federal United
States. Furthermore, you cannot be required to file or pay taxes
under the compelled benefit of using the Federal Reserve Notes,
because you have reserved your rights under the Common Law through
the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-207. The Founding Fathers would never have created a government that
was going to push them around! There were 13 sovereign States. They
were nations, and they joined together for protection from foreign
enemies. They provided a means by which the union of the sovereign
states could fend off foreign enemies. But they never gave the
congress of the federal United States direct rule over any Citizen of
any state. They were not going to be ordered around by that
government they set up. |
NOTICE: Author not affiliated with Freedom School. |
![]() Specialty Areas |
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action. Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2023
All Rights Reserved