Ken Evans Video Presentation - Copyright Your NAME
Meet Your Strawman!
Freedom - The NAME Game
Signature Without Liability Primer
email on gun control
On Oath of Office
Disscussion on money and
Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood
Disscussion on House Joint Resolution 192
and its legal effect
Concerning Marriage License
Federal Land grab and "The Bounty"
Fine work on the issue of a "this state" / "THE STATE OF TEXAS" DRIVER LICENSE
Indiana City Threatens Fines for Challenging Traffic Tickets
"The right of traveling pre dates the constitution and the corporate charter by 6 years in the Articles of Confederation Article 4, and reaffirmed in the NorthWest Ordinance of 1787 in Article 4. The Articles and the Ordinance remain in full force and effect.
See United States v. Guest, 383 US 745
There ain´t no specific constitutional right of freely traveling the land save for the Commerce Clause prohibiting impediments to commerce. All of our rights of traveling pre-date the constitution. You put in for mandatory judicial notice the Articles and the Ordinance and the Commerce Clause and the Guest case and the driver license issue goes to the issue of how much money and time the commercial agents of this state want to spent dealing with the only issue they cannot overcome. All of us got a computer and a printer, and paper is still cheap. Take each DL case to the US Supreme Court, stopping at every court in the upline on the way, and the state will go broke a little faster. Go have some fun!"
Comments on Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama´s lack of
to serve as President of the United States.
USA v. Seth Sundberg
To the Principals and creators of
debt made dischargeable - see
Guaranty v. Henwood, 307 US 247 -- annotated
Negotiable instruments must say,
payable to order or to bearer
...right out of the Georgetown Law Review
How Jewish Law Became English Law complete
Maxims Of Law
The Articles of Confederation
American Patriot and First President of the United States John Hanson
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
Wesley-David: family of Bowden items
Declaration of Rights
Petition and challenge to jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over one who is not a member of the bar, and who is practicing law, to punish him or it for contempt, except for some act which affects or interferes with the functioning of such court. State ex rel. Indianapolis Bar Ass´n v. Fletcher Trust Co. 211 Ind. 27, 5 N.E.2d 538 (1937)
Government officials in general, and police officers in particular, may not exercise their authority for personal motives, particularly in response to real or perceived slights to their dignity. Surely, anyone who takes an oath of office knows - or should know - that much. McCurdy v Montgomery County, Ohio, 240 F3d 512 (6th Cir. 2001)
The application of the Texas statute to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47
A person who is a citizen of the United States is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty,-the right to declare who are its citizens. The sovereignty of the citizens of a republic has its highest assertion in representative government, and is constituted in its political order in the representation of persons, and not of classes or of interests.
STATE ex rel. LECHE v. Fowler, 41 La.Ann. 380, 6 So. 602, La. 1889
Unless the defendant can establish that he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS possesses authority to attempt to determine his federal tax liability...
UNITED STATES v. SLATER, 545 F.Supp. 179, 50 A.F.T.R.2d 82-5353, 82-2 USTC P 9571
State ex rel. McNamee v. Stobie, 194 Mo. 14, 92 S.W. 191, Mo. 1906.
Employee to whom government is paving disability compensation held
employee of government, disqualified as juror.
UNITED STATES v. GRIFFITH et aI., 2F.2d 925 (1924)
The rule in America is that the American people are the sovereigns, and in them is lodged all power, and the agencies of government possess no authority save that which is delegated to them by the people in the written compact entered into between the people, which is styled the
Constitution, and the laws adopted by the representatives of the people in the Legislature assembled, consistent therewith...
Kemper v. State, 63 Tex.Crim. 1, 138 S.W. 1025, Tex.Crim.App. 1911.
The Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a statute
at the instance of one who has availed himself of its benefits.
Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U.S. 581, 8 S.Ct. 631
Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co., 244 U.S. 407, 411, 412 S., 37 S.Ct. 609; St.
Louis Malleable Casting Co. v. Prendergast Construction Co., 260 U.S. 469, 43 S.Ct. 178
ASHWANDER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY , 297 U.S. 288 (1936) - annotated
For study: The Ashwander Rules
the case Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288 (1936)
For study: Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah
Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure, Art. 15.01
The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.
See Title 15 U.S.C. Section 17