|
Another pro-Government Pamphlet Publication of… (pro-Constitutional Government) The Riot ActWhat’s Really Taking Place in a “Willful Failure to File” Trial Anyhow? ©2006 All Rights Reserved Compilation, editing, footnotes,
formatting & distribution by the American: Patriot
Riot 2nd edition, 1st
printing The facts surrounding the information that you are about to read stem from an immense fraud upon The People of our great nation long ago. In the late 1890's, a family that at that time ALREADY had more than 6 generations experience in undermining various nations of the world with National Debt, planned the creation of what was to become the PRIVATELY OWNED, US Federal Reserve, Plans were made however, not just for the Fed's FORMATION, but for its forced BANKRUPTCY. A forced BANKRUPTCY as soon thereafter and that would be in alignment with other events* this cunning group of thieves were orchestrating throughout the world. The timing of the US FED bankruptcy was determined by powerful banking families, the Rothschild (changed from Bauer) and Warburgs.* These two families clandestinely sat, and appear to sit today, at the head of a World Congress that came into existence in 1897. ·
1905 failed Russian
Revolution, 1914 WWI, and the 1917 successful Russian Revolution ·
"...the
"technical details" of the Federal Reserve Act is the work of Mr.
[Paul] Warburg more than any other man in the country... " (See Edwin Seligman, Proceedings of the Academy of
Political Science, Vol IV, No.4 (New York). Pp 3-6.) The Rockefeller and JP
Morgan family of the time were also very involved in the stealthy formation and
ownership of the US Federal Reserve. This author believes that the Morgan's no
longer have an active influence, However, while it is also believed that while
the Rockefeller family is closely involved and collects billions annually from
the proceeds, they are being duped by the majority owners: the Rothschild and
Warburg apparatus of the 21st century. As incredulous as this may first appear, we have now deciphered a chapter in a "Plan" that was first uncovered in Russia circa 1902/03. (Actually first written in Russian, translated to English circa 1906.) A "chapter" of this heinous "Plan" speaks directly to the formation of a nation's central bank; i.e. the US Federal Reserve, for the sole purpose of rapidly forcing its bankruptcy and the subsequent hidden-from-view-takeover of the attendant government.* Our tax laws were unlawfully adjusted by this event, and we became subjects of a government we believed was created by our ancestors. ·
In the Congressional
Record, 1934, Representative Louis T. McFadden states: There was no national
emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took office excepting the bankruptcy
of the Fed- a bankruptcy which has been going on under cover for several years
and which has been concealed from the people so that the people would continue
to permit their bank deposits and their bank reserves and their gold and the
funds of the United States Treasury to be impounded in these bankrupt
Institutions. ·
In 1930/34 McFadden was
Chairman of the House Currency and Finance Committee. Representative McFadden
at a banquet, in a very public way, shortly thereafter, was poisoned. This was
a warning to all those present that the subject matter was off limits The PRIVATELY owned US Federal Reserve was enacted by Congress on December 23rd, 1913. It, the "Fed" went belly-up in 1928. An event that has been withheld from the view of most of The People of this great nation. (There is a reason for this deception.) In 1933, the federal corporation known as the United States went into Receivership. >From 1933 forward The People of our great nation were changed into subjects (government's rationale makes us "customers") of what they still believe today to be the government formed by their ancestors, The Founders. (Pay close attention to the dates inasmuch as virtually all of what you read can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt with certifiable written documentation.) The "Plan" referred to above is covered in great detail in one of Mr. Riot's other pamphlets titled, "9/11, Why Did It Happen?" as well as "Invisible Contracts". The highly documented details, that you are about to read
are merely ONE of the many methods being used by the United States of
America to surreptitiously force the alleged voluntary collection of what
otherwise would be an unlawful (un-Constitutional) "Income" tax.
Additionally, it should be noted that the US Constitution created only one
principal of interest, the United States, NOT the United States
of America. Who is the plaintiff in all of these trials and where are the
organic documents that created the entity? Besides the centerpiece that is routinely used by a United States District Court* judge as shown in this brief Pamphlet, numerous other methods are detailed by a retired Chief Clerk of the United States District Court, Western District NY in the monumental 640 PLUS page work he left to posterity. * Read Mr. Riot's Pamphlet ---"Congress's Private (dirty little secret) Courts. Our INVISIBLE CONTRACTS
WITH TWO FEDERAL CORPORATIONS* KNOWN
AS THE "UNITED STATES" (and get-a-load-of-this)
The… "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA*"
Table of Contents
Read this (INVISIBLE CONTRACTS) book and find out what an angry Chief Clerk of the United States District Court learned over his tenure. Find out why what happens in all of our alleged federal courts... happens. Just whose name is on our debt-driven bankruptcy laden alleged currency? Who really is the "Plaintiff' in our alleged Federal Courts when the so-called government of the United States sues or attacks US Citizens as alleged Defendants, Civil, Criminal or otherwise, under the guise of the "United States of America"? Or is the United States of America actually prosecuting suits against mere US citizens. God bless George Mercier! It's unfortunate that he didn't know the complete truth. Get the total story of how our nation was stolen. Stolen by the owners of, and due to, their PREMEDITATED 1928 bankruptcy of the PRIVATELY Owned US Federal Reserve. A hidden & forced bankruptcy of their "Fed" causing the subsequent FORCED 1933 Receivership of The People's federal corporation known as the "United States". Read "1913, The Year THEY Stole America", By a disappointed American, Patrick Riot. Publication date: later in 2006. Let's Start With Some Basics... I am not an attorney and this information while very
accurate, cannot be viewed as legal advice. In fact you may be lucky and find a brave soul lawyer that is willing to unmask these truths in a federal court. I believe that this will be almost impossible inasmuch as most attorneys know full well that there are certain "things" they cannot do on behalf of clients: this is one. One of many and why you're usually screwed when counsel is "appointed" or worse yet when you actually pay one to "represent" your dumb "incompetent*" butt. (Rather than "assist" as is referred to in the US Constitution.) Never you mind though, inasmuch as you haven't a chance for relying on any Constitutional protections in these PRIVATE Congressional Legislative courts. * That's what the word "REPRESENT" means. You are "incompetent" and a lawyer may make all decisions for you accordingly. "ASSISTANCE" of counsel, as stated in the US Constitution, has a totally different meaning and is nowhere to be seen today. This is NOT the nation or the government originally founded by our ancestors. Not since the Fed bankruptcy (1928) and the US corporate Receivership (June 1933). When we go into court, the Plaintiff, that we unwittingly believe to be our nation, actually is the United States of America, which is discretely defined In Title 28 as state, appears to be now owned lock-stock-and-barrel* by the Rothschild, Warburg & Rockefeller/Morgan descendant apparatus. It's a game. But as you'll soon see... a very serious game! * Save one or two share for the federal corporation known as the Constitutionally created "United States". This is where we get screwed by ELECTING lawyers to MAKE our laws. Sometimes defendants win cases by accident: i.e. Vernle Kuglin or Joe Banister*. Just the same, most experienced lawyers know most of this and they will not use the truth to set you free. Notice the same lawyers turn up over and over again for "income" tax issues? It's an "industry" and in my humble opinion, only a few have been "sanctioned*" to be involved by the attendant powers in the government: i.e. Becraft, Bernhoft, Dickstein etc. * Not by the
court but by the system. Great way for a government mole to ingratiate himself,
keep an eye on what's going on, and make a good living; all the while being on
the inside. Taken directly from Chapter 3. "The Letter"; By the time you are reading this, the Judge may already have taken some action on the government's petition for a restraining order or whatever against you -- I cannot know the present status of your action, but the information you need to know will be important to you either way the Judge rules. If the restraining order has been granted, it can most likely be reversed next January. Before I identify the Private Agreement you continue to maintain with the Secretary of the Treasury (which agreement places you into a written, equity relationship with the United States), there is a fundamental principle underlying American jurisprudence you must be aware of as background material to understand what follows. This principle is a hybrid corollary and consistent extension of the evidentiary doctrine that specificity-in-evidence will always overrule generalities-in-evidence, even when they are in direct conflict with each other. For example, the statement by one witness to a crime that... "I saw a woman run around the corner, it wasn't a man..." (and therefore the defendant, who is a man, isn't the criminal). · Actually Joe was very innocent and his win may have been deliberate. When it came to "sculpting" the evidence, I believe a "decision" was made at a high level to cut him some slack. Nonetheless however, Joe was set-upon for large sums of money (for his sanctioned attorneys) and has been thusly warned to stay clear of the issue. Next time I don't believe he’ll get the same slack. No, I don’t believe that Joe was even aware this arrangement took place. I sincerely believe that the trial was essentially a theatre with elaborate sets known only to the defense attorneys. They get the publicity, more "Tax-Protesters" flock to their offices and they make tons of dough. Perfect cover for issues believed to be so serious for the nation. Yes, yes and another yes, I do believe certain attorneys have been chosen (sanctioned) by the government to be moles within various groups for intelligence gathering purposes. That statement would be overruled by this statement from another witness… "The person I saw run around the corner had long hair, a beard, and something like a tattoo on his neck…" Hence, conflicts in testimony are always resolved by giving the greater weight to the most specific statements. This is also the way equity grievances in CONTRACT DISPUTES are settled, and that's what all "Income" tax controversies in Federal Court are, CONTRACT DISPUTES. Duh!, -- the most specific, detailed clause governing the disputed circumstance is construed to be the statement meant to govern the disputed circumstances -- even though broader more general statements can be found in the contract (Title 26) and may favor the other party. The principle that applies to your relationship with the King (the King being the United States -- the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English Common Law as it was at THAT time, with only additional restrainments being placed on the King) is the principle that PRIVATE agreements will always overrule the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Thus, specific agreements governing individual circumstances will always overrule broad general clauses found in the Constitution. Or expressed in other words, it is irrational to allow someone to enter into a private agreement with another, and then allow him to take a clause out of another agreement, the Constitution that was never mentioned in the original PRIVATE Agreement -- off point and out of context -- and allow him to take that clause and use it to weasel, twist and squirm his way out of the original agreement, all while retaining the financial gain the original agreement gave him in the first place. This is irrational, and judges won't allow it. They will also not voluntarily tell you that they are looking at you through the PRIVATE agreement in question. For example, let's say that I hired you to come work for me as a computer design engineer for my computer company. When you started work for me you and I signed a PRIVATE agreement agreeing that all company information that you were exposed to while employed here, and all knowledge you acquired regarding impending new products and technologies being worked on here -- you had PRIVATELY agreed not to disclose, release or disseminate any such confidential information to any other person for a five year period after you left my employ for any reason. So let's say that you have now left my company, and you violate our PRIVATE Agreement. You immediately start publishing and disseminating information you learned while here to my competitors. Your excuse for violating the agreement you signed earlier with me that... "Well, the First Amendment says I got freedom of speech and press..." So now I take you in front of a judge and ask for a restraining order. Question: Does the First Amendment apply? The answer is no, it doesn't. Restraining order granted. Reason: Private agreements overrule the Bill of Rights. In other words, one does not get to use the Bill of Rights to weasel out of private agreements, while retaining the gain that the agreement gave him in the first place. In the back of the judge's mind is the following logic: "Well... you entered into an agreement with this man to be an engineer for him, and under which you experienced financial gain or profit. Now that you don't feel like honoring the PRIVATE agreement any longer, you want to take a clause out of the Bill of Rights to work your way out of your PRIVATE agreement with the other party, all the while keeping the money he gave you under the PRIVATE agreement by working for him. This is irrational. A Restraining Order will have to be granted." If another example is this: Say that you are a convict sitting in a prison. The warden calls you upstairs and offers to let you go free if you sign an agreement, essentially a PRIVATE agreement. That agreement calls for parole checking, warrant-less entry of your residence at any time, and you agree not to carry any guns. You sign the PRIVATE Agreement and clear out of prison. A month later your car is stopped for speeding and a gun is seen half covered in the back seat. The officer charges you with possession of a concealed weapon. You argue Second Amendment rights during pretrial motions. The trial judge ignores your motions and sets a trial date. Question: Is the judge a fifth column commie pinko? No, he isn't; he is merely enforcing PRIVATE Agreements. Here you signed a PRIVATE Agreement and you experienced a gain (premature freedom). Now you want to take the Second Amendment, and use that to weasel and twist your way out of an agreement, all while retaining the gain (freedom) that the agreement gave you. This is irrational, and judges will not allow it, properly so. You probably have heard it said that Federal Judges will tell defendants and counsel in Section 7203 --Willful Failure To File criminal trials that… "...the Constitution does not apply here. " That statement shocks most people up a wall --but it is an accurate and correct statement, The Judge will never tell you why, though. Of all of the different Judges that I know who have blurted out that statement, none of the criminal defendants have ever pressed the Judge for an explanation as to why the Constitution does not apply, The reason why the Constitution does not apply is because the Judge is merely enforcing PRIVATE Agreements the defendant signed with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Judge is not a fifth column commie pinko; the PRIVATE Agreement the Judge has in front of him is not the defendant's 1040 or the defendant's W-2/4; those are merely declarations of facts and no profit or gain is experienced by them. The real reason is as follows: PAY CLOSE ATTENTION NOW… When new Federal Judges are hired (nominated by the President and later confirmed by the Senate) after hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee -- after they go through that hiring procedure in Washington -- they are taken back to Washington and are taken into PRIVATE seminars that are sponsored by the United States Department of Justice. It is in these seminars that new Federal Judges are taught and trained "how to" manage their criminal proceedings so as to avoid reversible error, i.e., absence of counsel and trial procedure, etc. They are taught and trained what the Supreme Court of the United States wants for perfecting due process. They are given Supreme Court cases to study -- and sitting next to that new Judge in these seminars is their Appeals Court Justice (who will be auditing appeals coming out of their trial court), confirming that the information being taught and presented by Justice Department lawyers is true and correct and that "Things will be done this way." If you've been charged with Willful Failure to File, read below very closely for your filing venue regards the Judge and his employer's cudgel... the US Attorney. The Federal Judge probably is not going to want to disclose what document it is that you executed which created an attachment of equity jurisdiction. They have been asked not to let the cat-out-of-the-bag. The IRS handles this "bank account = equity relationship" on a military style "need-to-know" only type basis*. You can/should file a writ of MANDAMUS in the Circuit Court of Appeals and/or PETITION/(DEMAND) for a Subpoena Duces Tecum returnable AGAINST the U.S. Attorney to COMPEL DISCOVERY of what it is that you signed that created the attachment of equity jurisdiction that the King's (Congress's) Agents, IRS, DOJ (for the United States of America?) are now acting under in trying to get a restraining order or otherwise against you. This type of equity jurisdiction always attaches by written consent. * Most of the ms folks running around terrorizing The People haven't a clue. Only when some of these essentially good Americans fall low enough and demonstrate enough insensitivity to the basic meaning of the United States Constitution and/or lack of concern for their fellow American will they be promoted to the level that entails the necessary need-to-know. Very few ever reach that level. Probably no more than 15 to 20 low-life's throughout the nation. (X) Yes, I'm angry. If this restraining order has already been granted by now
- then get rid of your bank accounts and file a Petition/(DEMAND) (do not
confuse with a "Motion" which is merely a "request") for
reversal next January -- your arguments being then that you are not in an
equity relationship with the King anymore. Then the First Amendment would apply
then, but it does not apply to you now since you are in an equity relationship
with the King and private agreements overrule the Bill of Rights. The
Rest Of The Story Judges are given a "Bench Book" to take with them, giving the new Judge guidance on handling problems as they arise on the bench. Finally, the interesting part comes: They are taught how to manage "Tax Protester" trials -- violations of Title 26. Federal Judges have been instructed that the Supreme Court ruled in 1896 in a case called Davis vs. Elmira Savings, 161 U.S. 275 that national banks are "INSTRUMENTALITIES" of the Congress. In other words, or "in effect" legally, albeit unlawfully (un-Constitutionally -- and that's why the judges will not WILLFULLY disclose the nature of the alleged equity agreement), the interstate system of banks is the private property of Congress. This means that any profit or gain anyone experienced, even you, by a bank/thrift and loan/employee credit union – any Congressionally regulated financial institution carries with it --as an operation of law -- the identical same full force and effect as if the Congress* itself created the gain. So as an operation of law, anyone who has a depository relationship, or a credit relationship, with a bank, such as checking, savings, CD's, charge cards, car loans, real estate mortgages, etc., are experiencing profit and gain created by the King -- so says the Supreme Court. Remember, that one of the definitions of the United States is any "Instrumentality" of the... United States. *(of the United States
of America? -- or was it the Congress of the United States? -- here's that
entity again. Take note that the US Constitution created only ONE Congress
and that was of the United States NOT the United States of America.
Carefully read and re-read the United States Constitution. It is the "FUNDAMENTAL"
Law. You'l1 see it in 48 separate and discrete references to the United States.
When did the government of the United States become the government of the
United States of America?) The court does not wish to reveal this because I believe that it's scared shitless that it can be attacked mercilessly. For instance...how can this "instrumentality" doctrine operate on National Banks when the doctrine was opined by the Supremes in 1896 and the un-Constitutional Federal Reserve Act didn't come into existence until December 23rd 1913? Next, does the court really want to open the Pandora's Box of the supreme Court having to rule on the actual Constitutionality of the Federal Reserve Act as it was originally written and especially as it's currently written? It's clearly un-Constitutional in its current form and could never be defended as anything but... should this "dirty little secret" get out in the open. Just as an aside, did you know that the Federal Reserve Act is reenacted every Congress as a "housekeeping" chore? In actuality it's done so that all of Congress is at stake should this fraud ever be discovered. They'll be scurrying in every direction to save their "collective" butts and be willing to do whatever it takes to conceal the issue. Same as the Congress that was faced with the original bankruptcy circa 1928/1933 when it all came to a head. At the present time, most of us have bank accounts (because you accept checks as payment for books and subscriptions, contributions, etc.), and you are very much in an Equity Relationship with the King (Congress). In the words of Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter: "Equity
is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements." Or in other words, Judges don't like the idea of being thought upon as being mean Gestapo agents -- doing the dirty work for the King (Congress). They consider themselves as being stuck between a rock and a hard spot -- being asked to enforce agreements and without being given any valid reason as to why you should be let out of it -- other than you just don't feel like being incarcerated. Also without you the defendant having any specific knowledge of the details. Kinda like a secret law without really being a secret law. The whole scam was developed before the turn of the twentieth century by lawyers in our government working for Rothschild and Warburg. Clever beyond belief. The Fed was doomed to bankruptcy long before Warburg penned the words on Jekyll Island in 1910. So what happens during these Willful Failure to File trials is that:
"Well, Judge, the Fourth Amendment says..." "Judge, the Fifth Amendment says I don't gotta…" Are you beginning to see why the Judge is prone to experience frustration and blurt out "The Constitution does not apply here!"? He just won't tell you "...the rest of the story". Meanwhile, the Judge is ignoring all Constitutionally related arguments and denying all motions... and from his perspective rightfully so. Remember, you're not in a judicial" court but a "Legislative" court. It's really the right venue -- just that you haven't a clue. It's essentially FRAUD, constructive FRAUD, but because you can't figure it out it's never going to be exposed. That is until now. If you would go back to your bank and ask the manager show you your signature card again, in small print I will see that you have agreed to being a "U. S. 'Person" and the words, something to the effect: "The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of this Bank." Have you ever asked to see a copy of ALL the bank rules? A complete exposure? If you have, you will read and find out that you agreed to abide by all of the administrative rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury, among many other things. What is really happening in Willful Failure to File
prosecutions is that the Judge is operating on the penal clause to a civil
contract. And since you have agreed PRIVATELY to be bound by Title 26, what
difference does it make whether or not Title 26 was ever enacted by the
Congress? A PRIVATE contract does not have to be enacted by Congress -- in
whole or in part -- in order to make it enforceable, penal clauses included. Just when we thought it was safe to stop reading… The
Bankruptcy of the "United States: Presented to the House of Representatives on March 17,1993by: Rep. James A. Traficant (Now in federal prison -- guess why?) Mr. Speaker, we are here now in Chapter 11. Members of
Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of
any bankrupt entity in world history, the US government. We are setting forth,
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's
report that will lead to our demise. It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1 public Law 890719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress session of June S, 1933 --- Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States governmental offices, officers, and departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. The receivers of the United States bankruptcy are the International bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States offices, officials and departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War powers. With the constitutional Republican form of government now dissolved, the receivers of the bankruptcy had adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States". Editors Note: 2004 Whatever
you/we may want to call Jim Traficant, and face it, there are a number of great
adjectives, one thing is for sure: he cared more for the truth than for
politics. What
you've just read is entered in the Congressional Record. By and of itself that
does not make it 100% accurate and credible. (In fact he got it wrong. The
federal corporation known as the "United States" went into
receivership because of the easier disclosure rules.) However, with that said,
over a period of more than 50 years, it is firmly believed by thousands of
researchers that what you've read is the basis of the reason many people down
through those same 50 years turn up missing, silenced or dead. Jim Traficant is
not the first victim that resulted from publicly uttering these words. (When
you read of Congressman Hansen's torture ordeal, please keep in mind that the
IRS is merely the Pit Bull collection agency driven by the PRIVATELY owned US
Federal Reserve: NOT an "Agency" of the Constitutional government of
the United States. (No "organic" document exists.) Hence the 80-year
long controversy about just where the IRS has actual JURISDICTION.) Since the Federal
Reserve Is truly a 100% PRIVATE corporation there is no easy method to
determine who owns 100% of the Class "A" Common Voting stock. The
reason that the excerpt of Congressman Traficant's record is included is not so
much to educate you about the specific issue. It's here to show you first hand
that there are POLITICAL PRISONERS in the US federal system. Most of them are
unknown to the public. Mainstream Media has a self-interest in concealing this
fact. The primary owners of the "Fed" are sister and brother to those
that own most of our digital and print media. There is a strong belief that
there is a direct ownership and control linkage between Mainstream Media and
the US Federal Reserve. If
these paragraphs do nothing more than pique your curiosity, drive you to do
your own research regards the incremental and unyielding theft of the American
people by a cunning foreign interest, than they have succeeded in drawing you
closer to understanding the dimension of what appears to be the greatest bank
job in the history of mankind. (This is not a statement declaring belief in Congressman Traficant's innocence or guilt. Merely that a common denominator runs through certain lives associated with certain issues. How long before we wake up?) Collateral Evidence A Vindicated Congressman Hansen The government drove George Hansen, a 7-term veteran US lawmaker out of Congress, sent him to prison and financially destroyed him and his family! It took ten long years, but the U.S. Supreme Court now confirms that federal prosecution of Congressman George Hansen SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED! Congressman George Hansen was a seven-term congressman from Idaho at the time of his prosecution. Ex-Representative Richard Stallings, the Democrat who defeated Hansen In 1984, said the conviction was the key. "George could have had the 2nd district as long as he wanted. If he hadn't gotten in trouble, he'd probably be the Chairman of the Banking Committee." Hansen would be in his 14th term now. "If you want to play "What if" games, there would have been a lot of things... chairmanships, leaderships…" Hansen said, "But I just don't look back. " Hansen's 1984 conviction cost him his bid for an eighth term in 1984 – by a mere 170 votes. It also brought incarceration in a federal prison and a $40,000 fine. In December of 1995, the conviction was vacated by the trial judge in Washington D.C. who managed to delay Hansen's release for another 5 months. Between "diesel therapy" and other tortures at the hands of fellow Americans in the US Marshals Service, Hansen is a shell of what he used to be. All done at the hands of an allegedly benevolent government because he threatened to bring attention to our unlawful money system. During the weeks and months of diesel therapy, the prisoner is out of contact with the rest of the world. In the case of Congressman Hansen, his wife did not know if he was dead or alive. His lawyer could not find him and therefore could not file court papers on time. Even the members of congress who were still trying to help him, could not locate him. During his diesel therapy he disappeared into the black hole dug and run by the United States Marshal service. Hansen got back his $40,000, but wants a lot more. He's asking the House to withdraw its reprimand and pay him for legal fees and lost wages. "I feel like the guy On Boot Hill with the tombstone that says. "Hanged by Mistake," Hansen said. Along with Congressman Traficant Congressman Hansen was one of the first members of Congress, to point a finger at the privately owned and controlled US Fed and its PRIVATE collection agency... the IRS. In the late 70s he wrote a book called "To Harass Our People". Hansen was the first to get a full-scale investigation into the crimes of the IRS against the American people. Outrage over what he discovered played a major role in the subsequent writing and ultimate passage of the 1988 "Taxpayers Bill of Rights." Without the determination of Congressman Hansen, by now the IRS would probably be the American equal to the Gestapo. Hansen was concerned about the operation of the Federal Reserve and; the undue power it exercises over the National Debt and Congress. He was planning an investigation into these matters when charges were filed. 75th
and other Congressional Records Some
specific to pgs 12595-12603 Address
to the House on June 10. 1932, Louis
T. McFadden Excerpts: Quotations below are from several speeches made on the Floor of the House of Representatives by the Honorable Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania. Mr. McFadden, due to his having served as Chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee for more than 10 years, was the best posted man on these matters in America and was in a position to speak with authority about the silent US Receivership. As Representative of a State which was among the first to declare its freedom from foreign money tyrants, it is fitting that Pennsylvania, the cradle of liberty, be again given the credit for producing a son that was not afraid to hurl defiance in the face of the money-bund. Whereas Mr. McFadden was elected to the high office on both the Democratic AND Republican tickets, there can be no accusation of partisanship lodged against him. Because these speeches are set out in full in the Congressional Record, they carry weight that no amount of condemnation on the part of private individuals could hope to carry. "There
was no national emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took office excepting
the bankruptcy of the Fed - a bankruptcy which has been going on under cover
for several years and which has been concealed from the people
so that the people would continue to permit their bank deposits and their bank
reserves and their gold and the funds of the United States Treasury to be impounded
in these bankrupt institutions." "Some
people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They
are NOT government institutions. They are private credit monopolies
which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their
FOREIGN and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders." "These
twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon
this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us our
hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money
out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a
reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They
instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia, and thus drove a
wedge between the allies in World War. They financed Trotsky's passage from New
York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian
Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution, and placed a large
fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal in one of their branch banks in
Sweden." "On April 27, 1932, the Fed outfit sent $750,000 belonging to American bank depositors in gold to Germany. A week later another $300,000 in gold was shipped to Germany. About the middle of May $12,000,000 in gold was shipped to Germany by the Fed. Almost every week there is a shipment of gold to Germany. These shipments are not made for profit on the exchange since the German marks are below parity with the dollar." On May 23rd 1933, Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges of Conspiracy, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion and Treason against the Federal Reserve Board. The subsequent Petition for Articles of Impeachment was referred to the Judiciary Committee. It's now 2005. It has yet to be acted upon!
So, with that statement let's finish this pamphlet with something that should beg more questions. It should be remembered that David Rockefeller's granddad, John D. along with Paul Warburg and Britain’s (originally Germany's) Rothschild apparatus (Bauer -Pawer, author of, De Re Metallica) wrote and had passed the US Federal Reserve Act in 1913. An Act that created a privately owned central bank that for all intents and purpose is mistakenly believed by the American people to be federally owned and operated. (Boy are they surprised when they find out the Fed who distributes our currency, controls the National Debt and that collects all the interest due is PRIVATELY owned.) Money being fungible, when the Rockefeller Cartel fully financed Mr. Truman's rise to the presidency, it's unclear whether the dollars used, came from Rockefeller's oil largesse or from the dollars paid to their federally TAX FREE trusts due to their partial private ownership of the us Federal Reserve. Dollars paid to the Rockefeller's, et al, through the American people's Industry and hard labor in the form of the Income tax. An" Income" tax that's used almost exclusively to pay merely the interest charges against the fabricated National Debt to the privately owned US Fed. Thanks to FDR In 1933, it should be noted that all this money is paid to these crooked bastards... statutorily tax-free.* * TITLE 12 > CHAPTER 4 > SUBCHAPTER I
> §531 Exemption From TaxationFederal reserve banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein and the income derived therefrom, shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except taxes upon real estate. The Story Behind JFK's Executive Order 11110 (Note: Attorney Larry
Becraft tries to dismiss the following with the most convoluted misinformation
on the subject. In my opinion, if he has shown his true colors and just who is
his real employer it's with this issue.) Shown below is a specimen of the unlawful/un-Constitutional Federal Reserve Note that we are accustomed to seeing every day. That "Title" (Federal Reserve Note) sits just above the name of the owner of this alleged currency, (debt) the "United States of America. " (Find the "organic" document that created this entity and you'll have found the modern day equivalent of the Holy Grail.) The "Note" itself is NOT money. Rather it's the debt of the nation, a sham, an un-Constitutional device that is unlawful (un-Constitutional) in every way possible and a constructive fraud, issued by a creditor that for the most part is owned by foreigners. Hence, it would appear that once known and understood by very few of The People (less than 10% will provide critical mass), those in Congress that reaffirm the US Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as a "housekeeping" measure with each and every new Congress are probably guilty of nothing less than... TREASON!!! There are many in government that are fully aware and will do anything to conceal the truth. ANYTHING!!! Read your headlines!!! Better yet arrest a few of these so-called career politicians. Remove Senator Hatch, Spector or Senator Waxman or many of the other career politicians*, of our times to an undisclosed location, possibly Gitmo or "render" them to Syria for intense questioning on the subject. * Career
politicians keep their seats for one of two reasons: they're actually very good
and loved by their constituency or they have learned certain things that make
them a threat if they're not in office. Then there are those like Jim Traficant
or George Hansen who were in process of learning what was going on but couldn’t
be bought off. FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE
Every Federal Reserve Note (Dollar) distributed into the US economy by the PRIVATELY owned US Federal Reserve represents "US National Debt". This debt accrues "Interest". A minimum of tens of BILLIONS in ANNUAL "Interest" Is collected from "Income" taxes paid by The People against their industry and labor, their ultimate property. This "Interest" is paid as "Income" that has been made statutorily TAX FREE* to PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS. These "INDIVIDUALS" are now the Descendant Apparatus that today continue to PRIVATELY own and control the "Fed". * See Title 12, Section 531. Shown on page 14 is an actual specimen of JFK's United States Note. Stated as such just above the "Title" The United States of America. There are those that would guarantee you that the "organic document" that created the entity (United States of America) shown on JFK's United States Note is a different "organic document" than that which create" the entity (United States of America) of the same shown on the un-Constitutional Federal Reserve Note. The United States Note was lawfully/Constitutionally backed by SILVER. The issuance of the 1958 United States Note would have begun a process that ultimately would have returned our nation to The People and restored our sovereign status as a nation among nations. This status is more desirable than a debtor under the yoke of a few cunning swindlers. Swindlers and scam artists supporting the unlawful development of a renegade middle-eastern nation at the expense of its indigenous population. And also at the expense of American interests and American lives that are lost daily. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the alleged lawful currency were un-Constitutional. "United States Notes" were issued as an INTEREST-FREE and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. About five (5) months after Issuing Executive Order 11110 president Kennedy was assassinated* on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal/procedural currency of the nation. (However, the alleged currency is not lawful/Constitutional inasmuch as its use is purely voluntary although The People haven't a clue.) According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes. * Strong
indications lead reasonable people to believe that it was done under contract
by mobster Gregory Scarpa Sr. and handled by Rockefeller's CIA. Read The Riot
Act Pamphlet "History Lesson". Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have begun the elimination of use of debt backed Federal Reserve Notes. This is a simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was backed by nothing of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 would have prevented the National Debt from reaching its current level if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. (Virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) Enforcement of Executive Order 11110 would facilitate the U.S. Government’s ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to crate new "money." Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver. Ike’s & JFK’s United
States Note
Ike's/JFK's US Note threatened the so-called earnings represented by the "Interest" payments to the PRIVATE owners of the "Fed". Furthermore, the US Note would have begun severe erosion of the accompanying and more perverse (also highly un-Constitutional) power exercised over the Congress of the United States. All facilitated by the "National Debt". It continues today until We The People put a stop to it! Good men and women in the US military being used as a cudgel for PRIVATE interests are dying every day in foreign lands. PRIVATE interests that created the underlying conflicts in the first place! It's a desperately sick
situation! Post-Post Script: Louis T. McFadden was Chairman of the House Currency and Finance Committee before, during and after the so-called "Great Depression". (Really Great Deception) McFadden knew first hand what had happened to our nation. Representative McFadden was poisoned at a banquet shortly after filing the charges noted on the previous page in a very PUBLIC way similar to JFK. McFadden's poisoning was a warning to those present not to disclose the truth. As much as he did know, McFadden did NOT know the Fed's bankruptcy was planned before Mssrs. Warburg, Rothschild, Morgan and Rockefeller even formed the entity. The quote on the next page from the seventh (7th) generation of what is known as the Rothschild Apparatus (International/Jewish*) banker is what Jefferson understood and feared the most. It is the antithesis of where The Founder's law, our beloved United States Constitution demands we should be today. * Read The Riot Act Pamphlet "The Jews Did Nothing, Leave Them Be". Rockefeller and Morgan were Christians. Are all Christians guilty? No!! But they [Rockefeller, Morgan, and associated company] are all... CROOKS!!! "Let me issue and control a nation's money… ...and I care not who writes its laws!" Mayer
Nathaniel (Nattie) Rothschild, "The" International Banker, a distant
7th generation grandchild of Meyer Amschel Bauer (shown above), in a speech to
a gathering of world bankers February 12,1912. "Nattie" had reason to be cocky. On 12/31/1913 "his" Privately owned US Federal Reserve was signed into law by a coerced President Woodrow Wilson. Mayer was a 6/7th Generation International banker. Circa 1640 his ancestors changed their name from Pawer to Bauer, and then circa 1815 from Bauer to Rothschild. Down through history, the Rothschild’s have been morphing their identity and hiding. Today their camouflage is beyond insidious. You'll see that in "Invisible Contracts". Since 1913, the Rothschild/Warburg APPARATUS owns a majority stake in our nation's US Federal Reserve. In 2005 they are now in their 13th generation of the same business of owning, controlling and MANIPULATING many a nation's debt. The Crisis (1st paragraph} By Thomas Paine December 23, 1776 THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER"* and if being bound in that manner is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God. [The emphasis shown above is By Thomas Paine]
|
Specialty Areas
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
