Travel Information - Resource Page

Information presented is presented, without prejudice, in the public interest.
Not intended as legal advice.

Unless otherwise stated the various parties presented here are not affiliated with Freedom School

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.

Jack McLamb: Right to Travel

United States v. Guest, 383 US 745 United States v. Guest, 383 US 745; Justice Harlan on the  right to travel

Driver Licensing vs. the Right to Travel

"Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and highways is not a mere privilege but is a right or liberty protected by the guarantees of Federal and State constitutions." Adams v. City of Pocatello 416 P.2d 46
"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)
"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky. 731, 17 S.W.(2d) 1012,66 A.L.R.1378; and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 154 S. E. 579, A.L.R. 604. (11 Am.Jur. § 329)
"The license charge imposed by the motor vehicle act is an excise or privilege tax, established for the purpose of revenue in order to provide a fund for roads while under the dominion of the state authorities, it is not a tax imposed as a rental charge or a toll charge for the use of the highways owned and controlled by the state." - PG&E v. State Treasurer, 168 Cal 420.
To them may be added the case of W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota, 180 U.S. 452, 468, where it was held that "the acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provisions of the statute . . . that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.", Power Manufacturing Company v. Saunders, 274 U.S. 490 (1927).


New Mexico: Tom Hyland One Citizen´s Quest to Travel Free

Read & Learn

Texas: Exposing the driver's license scam


"People who fight may lose.                                       
People who don't fight have already lost."
---Bertolt Brecht

> > > On the road a PowerPoint presentation < < <

What Is A License?  What Is A License?

United States v. Herrera  United States v. Herrera

The Mythological Motor Vehicle The Mythological Motor Vehicle

driver Driver – a Table of Authorities

U.S. Code : Title 18 : Section 31

(a) Definitions. - In this chapter, the following definitions apply:
(6) Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10) Used for commercial purposes. - The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

DOT 150 - Motor Vehicle DOT 150

DOT 150 - Motor Vehicle Instructions for using DOT 150

DOT 150 - Motor Vehicle DOT 150: memorandum in support


FMSCA rules FMSCA rules

police training on traffic Stops Police Training on Traffic Stops

What kind of training did this officer receive? (watch & learn)

National Motorists Association Blog
Use This Card To Stand Up For Your Rights At Roadblocks
5 Things You Need To Know About Roadblocks

Electronic citations speed up ticketing process for police

Senator Wayne Stump Letter Senator Wayne Stump Letter (best copy available)

Hari Heath: The Sword of Commerce


The ´civil´ Traffic Ticket -- "it Ain´t No Crime" ... at Least That´s What the State Claims!

Read, learn and act accordingly:MAGISTERIAL DUTIES Texas Municipal Courts Education Center (TMCEC) Bench Book, CHAPTER 1  MAGISTERIAL DUTIES


Shapiro v. Thompson

If you´ve relied on prior decisions If you´ve relied on prior decisions...

Click here for noteable court cites

Walking through border posts, airports and public places?
Department of Homeland Security´s  ´Pre-crime´ detector shows promise.

Price overruns for nuke detectors likely to be in the billions Price overruns for nuke detectors likely to be in the billions, says GAO

confidence = NO negotiation

Commercial Driver License Handbook - Texas Commercial Driver License Handbook - Texas
(Notice the "Prologue")
See also, Texas Department of Public Safety

American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators

motor vehicle


(Indicate commercial activity)
Car, conveyance, machinery, road machine vehicle, motor vehicle
personal use recreational vehicle vehicle, motor vehicle
Guests, friends, family passengers
Traveling, journeying driving, operating
Traveling, journeying, moving transportation
Public Right of Way road / street
Abode, living, housekeeping Residence / Resident
Domicile Residence
Inhabitant, Non-Resident Resident
Non-Domestic Resident / Domestic
Non-Commerical Commercial, "this state"
- good - - not good -
autonomy Sovereignty
Me, I do not consent. OK / OKay / yes
Me, I do not understand.  
Private Property  
No Trespass  
Me, I am capable of making an informed decision.  
* * * List not meant to be exhaustive. Suggestions & additions welcomed. * * *

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance or
conscientious stupidity."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.
"The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about
and refuse to investigate."
--Dr. Wayne Dyer
"If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch." --Molly Ivins
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." -Benjamin Franklin
"Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds
appointed to guard the past."
--Maurice Maeterlinck

Question for an Attorney  Question for an Attorney, "Did you attend law school so you can read, write, understand "legalese," make a "legal determination" or are you "legally blind"?"

Freedom lost  Freedom lost?

"Me, if I am here at all my presence is special as I am here as result of a force bill of pain and penalty against my Life, Liberty, pursuit of happiness and my well-being; and as I am aware of [the following]:

"No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction."
Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768

"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be 'assumed', it must be proved to exist!"
Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751, 211 P.2s 389

"Jurisdiction once challenged cannot be assumed and must be decided."
Maine v. Thiboutot, 100 S.Ct. 2502

"Where jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven."
Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 at 533

I am calling into question the application of the {particular code} over myself and my property."

Certified petition to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation  Petition to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation

Comity Comity

He who imposes the terms of the battle - imposes the terms of the peace.

Right to Carry Handgun in Vehicle While Traveling Right to Carry Handgun in Vehicle While Traveling

Gun Control Doesn´t Work, Editor´s Commentary

Rising Gun Ownership Has Helped Cut Murder Rates for Americans Over 25, New Study Says

email on gun control < < <

Handicap: Your opponent has a handicap IF he cannot control himself.

right to travel  Right to Travel earns Recognition

Traffic Tickets Punish while Rewarding State Traffic Tickets Punish While Richly Rewarding the State

Speeding tickets: a form of tyranny? Speeding tickets: a form of tyranny?

The ´Civil´ Traffic Ticket – “It ain´t no crime” …at least that´s what the state claims!


How To Beat A Speeding Ticket Advice offered here is that of attorney Norman G. Fernandez

Just Say ´No´ to Police Searches |

Discover the  Fourth Amendement

The Fourth Amendment "is not  an adjunct* to the ascertainment of truth." The guarantees of the Fourth Amendment stand "as a protection of quite different constitutional values "values reflecting the concern of our society for the right of each individual to be let alone. To recognize this is no more than to accord those values undiluted respect." Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U. S. 406, 416.  Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 US 218, 242 (1973).

*Adjunct: added or connected in a secondary or subordinate position; auxiliary - one may interpret this to mean that one does have a right not to tell the government everything; in fact, a right to hide stuff from them! (Not Legal Advice.)
They do not want you to know this! (This is in a majority decision!)

No More Pre-Trial Bail in California  No More Pre-Trial Bail in California

Texas Cash Bail System Ruled Unconstitutional  Texas Cash Bail System Ruled Unconstitutional

Not awake yet? Perhaps this might help you.


Brown v. Texas excerpts from  Brown v. Texas

High Court limits vehicle searches April 2023: High Court limits  vehicle searches

National Motorists Association Blog
You Have The Right To Remain Silent -- But Only If You Say So

Opposed to the use of roadblocks? Visit
(Hint - operators of roadblocks are not your friends.)

“The temporary detention of individuals during an automobile stop by the police, even if only for a brief period, constitutes a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, an automobile stop is subject to the Constitutional requirement that the seizure not be ´unreasonable´ under the circumstances.” Litzenberger v. Vanim, No. 01-5454, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13843 (E.D. Pa. July 31, 2002) (citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806, 809-10 (1996)
"Gee Officer, what is your articulate-able reason for stopping me?"

Must See Video "I Don´t Need To Stop at a Checkpoint to Prove Who I Am Because This Is America"

When Official Truth Collides With Cheap Digital Technology
Know Your Rights When Dealing With Police Officers

How To Deal With Police Officers

VIDEO: How not to pull over for a...

What Not To Say To The Nice Police Office

How To Deal With Police Officers - Magic Words?

Don't want to take time to learn this stuff? May we offer you this:
Man Wrongly Convicted of Runaway´s Murder Will Sue Milwaukee Police

VIDEO: Citizen´s Guide to Surviving Police Encounters

Awareness of this may be helpful
" (3) That an acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not require the licensee to respect or to comply with any provisions of the statute or with any regulations prescribed by the state . . . that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. V. MINNESOTA, 180 U. S. 452 (1901)

"Me, I am unable to make a legal determination, I am going to remain silent.
I am capable of making informed decisions. I want assistance of counsel."

VIDEO: Professor James Duane from Regent Law School explains why
innocent people should never talk to the police.
"Don´t Talk to the Police" by Professor James Duane (read Transcript )

VIDEO: George Bruch from the Virginia Beach police department responds to Professor James Duane´s presentation on why innocent people should never talk to the police.
"Don´t Talk to the Police" by Officer George Bruch
[See what one may be up against CaseCracker Interview Management System]

How could four men confess to a brutal crime that they didn't commit?
...then go ahead and ´talk´ with the police... The Confessions

" Me, I am (will be) happy to talk about what I may be aware of...
with immunity!"


Generally a city´s charter makes a mention that that all ordinances much be in compliance with state law.
Reading a city´s charter - look carefully for the word "power."
Only ´certain powers´ are conveyed to cities and most of the powers deal with issues of health and safety.
Look to find the power of police in the city charter. Chances are that here is none.
Austin, Texas for example: the Austin City Charter says that there is a police department which is an office under the mayor and city council. (See here)
There is no provision for police officers in the city charter. The City of Austin Police Department contracts privately with the mayor and city council via the city manager.
Yes, to say it in other words, they appear to be nothing more than private security guards.
Harmed or damaged by police action? Consider a law suit against the city.
Better yet -- get to know who you are and act accordingly.

Right to Remain Silent When Stopped by Police
Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 1979
Syllabus   Full Text

Read - Study - Learn Miranda v. Arizona

Officer, you´ve got the wrong person [false arrest] Original story
(interesting comments)

Arrest Proof Yourself  Arrest Proof Yourself

Know Your Rights:
What To Do If You're Stopped By Police, Immigration Agents or the FBI  article
ALCU Bust Card

Lie Behind the Lie Detector

  CIA Human Resource Exploitation Manual

A Legal Guide To Survival In Post 911 America Know Your Rights

"The temporary detention of individuals during an automobile stop by the police, even if only for a brief period, constitutes a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, an automobile stop is subject to the Constitutional requirement that the seizure not be ´unreasonable´ under the circumstances." Litzenberger v. Vanim, No. 01-5454, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13843 (E.D. Pa. July 31, 2002) (citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806, 809-10 (1996)

The use of excessive force can be an unlawful "seizure" under the Fourth Amendment. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989); Carswell v. Borough of Homestead, 381 F.3d 235, 240 (3d Cir. 2004). In deciding whether challenged conduct constitutes excessive force, a court must determine the objective "reasonableness" of the challenged conduct, considering "the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight." Graham, 490 U.S. at 396.


When you look around the web, you´ll find a public servant questionnaire, but not like this one. Its been converted to a single page so you can get a multi-part NCR form made up at FedExOffice, Staples, Office Depot, etc.. Keep some by the door to your house and in your glove compartment to give to [any] law enforcement officers who want to ask you questions. Before answering theirs, make them answer yours. You´ll find supporting law in 5 U.S.C. 552a

understand Do you  understand?

"When plunder has become a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850)

Escape: There´s always an excape.

Someone say, "REAL ID"?

Department of Homeland Security | Preserving our Freedoms, Protecting America
REAL ID Final Rule: Questions & Answers
Recognizing states that need more time

A Primer on REAL ID
Another Primer on REAL ID
...and yet another primer on REAL ID
Three Years Later: ...and yet another primer on REAL ID

Quick primer on REAL ID

VIDEO: What May Be Ahead

Today we´re all prisoners in the USA

How to Create the Perfect Fake Identit How to Create the Perfect Fake Identity

Police Put Activists´ Names On Terror Lists Police Put Activists' Names On Terror Lists

United States Patent Number 5,629,678 United States Patent Number 5,629,678: Apparatus for tracking and recovering humans

New York Offers Drivers License with RFID Tag

Chips in official IDs raise privacy fears


Hitachi develops RFID powder    /   (See, Hitachi)

RFID Chips Ex-IBM Employee reveals TV Abandoned Analog Band to Make Room for RFID Chips
An introduction to New Technologies (Part I)

International Driving Permit  International Driving Permit Information Package Freedom School is not affilated with PATA.)

Well here is some Real ID information.

various documents concerning REAL ID Act

Voter ID Battle Shifts to Proof of Citizenship Voter ID Battle Shifts to Proof of Citizenship


Customs Declaration

Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches
Travelers' Laptops May Be Detained At border No Suspicion Required Under DHS Search Authority  DHS Policies
Groups to warn panel about economic effect of seizing laptops
FISA and border Searches of Laptops
EU lawmakers criticize virtual strip search
New bill would tighten rules for DHS border laptop searches

U.S. Lacks Gov't Agency To Stop ID Thefts

Fraud-prevention pitchman becomes ID theft victim
Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy with the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, "There is no company that can guarantee they can protect you (completely) against identity theft, absolutely nobody can do that." [Gee, does that extend to government as well?]
Straight Talk about Identity Theft Monitoring Services
Report: More UCLA staff saw celebs' health records
Thieves skim credit card data at fuel pumps  Thieves skim credit card data at fuel pumps (Notice the last line of the article.)
Meet A-Z: The computer hacker behind a cybercrime wave Meet A-Z:  The computer hacker behind a cybercrime wave
UK Government Spills Personal Data of Millions

ID Theft Ring Attacked Retailers on Multiple Levels

Tech Staff Admit They´d Steal Secrets If Laid Off  Tech Staff Admit They'd Steal Secrets If Laid Off

Rebellion within UK government over plans for massive spy database

OPERATION: DE-FUSE / "Getting to know Big Brother"

Visit the National Motorists Association Blog

On the street dialog...

The cop pulled me over, when he approached me and said: "What is your name"

I responded by stating, "What, is the question?"

Again he stated "What is your name" to which I again responded, "That is incorrect, what is not my name."

Again he stated "What is your name" to which I responded "I just told you what is NOT my name."

"Perhaps your inquiry would be better if you asked me a question instead of making statements that are un-true." -- "I know what I am - question is, do you?"

He then asked "who are you" and again I had to direct him and inform him that it wasn't who but "what" am I."

"Okay, what are you" to which I informed him [that] "I am a living breathing man on the soil, A child of my creator, the creator of all things in Heaven and on Earth, just who might you be?"

He broke into a tirade and admitted I was a living breathing man on the land by stating, "WELL I CAN SEE THAT !"

I smiled, from that point he can't ever presume that I am a legal fiction or that I am incompetent for believing I am the same [thing] as appears on a [plastic] license or [alleged] ID card.

He who has the most confidence controls the event, the people or the situation.     (Think about it.)

Handicap: You opponent has a handicap IF he cannot control himself.

Did someone say, "quotas"?

Here are four memos that seem to add substance to rumors.
These four memos were topic of KXAN Austin, Texas, TV news story, January 16, 2008.
Texas DPS  Memos Outline Trooper Arrest Quota

Texas DPS Memos Texas DPS Memo: Criminal Traffic Enforcement
Texas DPS Memos Texas DPS Memo: Coaching And Training Session
Texas DPS Memos Texas DPS Response No. 1
Texas DPS Memos Texas DPS Response No. 2

More on Texas DPS More on Texas DPS

Did someone say, "Mobile Revenue Generator"?

Cruiser-Top Cameras Make Police Work a Snap
(The article doesn't mention what happens to the data on legal plates. Suppose the DHS decides it wants a permanent archive of who was where, when?)

VIDEO: Police License Plate Scanner

VIDEO: Loover

VIDEO: How Any Idiot Can Beat a RADAR Speeding Ticket

VIDEO: TEXAS, U.S.A. Some Texas law enforcement appear corrupt,  and this CNN video proves it

Texas city Police Chief and mayor battle over officer Texas city Police Chief and mayor battle over officer read here

Claim:  Motorists in most U.S. states can be fined for failing to slow down or change lanes when passing parked emergency vehicles.

Did someone say, "Red-Light Cameras"?
(It simple. Stopping at red light or a stop sign is not optional - IT IS THE LAW! ...and who doesn't want people to adhere to the law?)

Cities Caught Illegally Tampering With Traffic Lights
To Increase Revenue Of red light Cameras - follow the various links...

Dick Armey Exposes  Traffic-Light Spying

Cities Removing Red-Light Cameras To Increase Traffic Ticket Revenues

Cities seek dismissal of red-light lawsuits

Orwell´s Cash Machine Out of Service in San Diego  Read Here

Traffic Camera California: Traffic Camera Case

House Research Organization
red-light Cameras in Texas red-light Cameras in Texas: A  Status Report

...meanwhile, in Houston, Citizens Against Red Light Cameras
Houston´s red-light cameras to go dark Monday
Judge Rules Red-Light Camera Election ´Invalid´

red-light camera monkey business may be a national trend

Traffic Camera Conundrum Dallas, Texas: Traffic Camera Conundrum

As extra red-light cams went up, Houston tickets went down Houston, Texas: As extra red-light cams went up, Houston tickets went down

First of 9 red-light cameras set to start clicking Austin, Texas: First of 9 red-light cameras set to start clicking   VIDEO

Fighting red Light Camera Tickets

Howard Griswold Conference Call concerning red Light Camera Tickets

What are the most common red-light camera case rejections?

Ticket Assassin

Pay No Fine-  A User Guide to Successfully Fighting Traffic Tickets

How to Beat a Speeding Ticket

Why Are They Installing The Cameras?
The Intersection of Strategy and Measurement--The Red Light Camera.
An interesting perspective on the question!

Federal Highway Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration´s red Light Camera Systems  Operational Guidelines

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety´s page concerning red light running

Evaluation of red light camera (photo-red) enforcement Evaluation of red light camera (photo-red) enforcement  final report

National Motorists Association´s (NMA) Objections To Photo Enforcement

How’s My Driving?  A Q&A With the Author of Traffic

Consider that a ticket from a red light camera may be disposable because
you did not sign a promise to appear.
(See Opinion No. JC-0317 below.)

Can one dispute a red light ticket? "I want the camera brought in to court so that I can question it. Thank you big brother."
Bring the matter to trial, jury - (´the whole nine yards´) -- and then tell them that there is a failure to lay proper predicate and that you want the matter dismissed.

Traffic camera photos are hearsay and inadmissible absent other "foundational" evidence - see,  California Appeals case ruling

Did someone say, "Toll Roads"?

Hacking electronic-toll  systems

checkpoints Texas DPS requests AG opinion on driver license checkpoints
read and consider signing the petition against checkpoints
UPDATE: DPS withdraws plan to set up license checkpoints


A player distracted is a player defeated.

Did someone say, "registration"?

...concerning Texas registration

...word games

State Vehicle Codes Summary

NO Law requires you to record / pledge your private automobile NO Law requires you to record / pledge your private automobile

"The law requires PROOF OF JURISDICTION to appear on the Record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533

Kingdom of Heaven  Traveling Licenses

insurance Someone say, " insurance"

Did someone say, "Airline travel"?

Texas woman: TSA forced nipple ring removal...

How To Fly Without ID

TSA to let polite terrorists fly without ID

Schneier on Security

Case of John Gilmore in the 9th Circuit  Case of John Gilmore, you are allowed to fly without showing ID; story

The Great No-ID Airport Challenge

How to Fly Without ID and Skip Lines

letter from the TSA, written to Senator John Warner letter from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)  written to Senator John Warner,
concerning flying, don't leave home without it.

DIALOG: FAA Flyer stating  no ID required

VIDEO: TV News station sends an undercover producer to KCI Airport to put security screening to the test.

Airports crack down on identification regulations  Airports crack down on identification regulations

Congressman still faces airport screening problem Congressman still faces airport screening problem screening problem

Government´s terrorist watch list aiding fight Government´s terrorist watch list aiding fight

Missing SFO laptop found--where it went missing

Mark Nestmann: Canadian Customs Wants Your Laptop, Too

Fliers without ID placed on TSA list Fliers without ID placed on TSA list.

2009 (underwear bomber): Flight 253 passenger Kurt Haskell: ' I was visited by the FBI'
what ´they´ want...(A)   /    what ´they´ want...(B)
Get Naked to Defeat Terrorists
Inverted Body Scanner Image Shows Naked Body In Full Living color
Exposed: Naked Body Scanner Images Of Film Star Printed, Circulated By Airport Staff

For more about body scaning see,
Information For People Who Travel By Air

ScanWOW from NWO Solutions

New Year´s Resolutions   /    Total Body Security Scan
Christmas In January   /    Naked Airport Security solution

What´s the point of treating us all like terrorists? Jason Stanford: What´s the point of treating us all like terrorists?

Infowars Archive: Control Grid Implementation of Body Scanners

Scholars say security machines violate rules of modesty Airport body scans defy Islamic law


TSA Incident Proves Authorities Are Engaged In Monumental Body Scanner Cover-Up

Did someone say Police impersonators?

In Texas “Peace officer” means a person elected, employed, or appointed as a peace officer under Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 51.212 ~ 51.214, Education Code, or other law.
OK, then whoever is pretending to be a “Peace officer” should have no difficulty in producing competent evidence of election, employment or appointment - yes?
And that election, employment or appointment possibly has conditions - yes?
And is the actor complying with, operating within all the conditions? (For more see DIALOG below.)
And does one not have a right and a duty to ascertain just who it is that they are dealing with?
YES, one does have the right and duty!

Police and other impersonators Police and other impersonators

Police impersonators preying with ease Police impersonators preying with ease

Police impersonators Police impersonators

Motorists warned of police impersonators Motorists warned of police impersonators

Impostors raise real concerns for police Impostors raise real concerns for police

Police impersonator charged after arrest by real people Police impersonator charged after arrest by real people

Police impersonators, miscellaneous stories Police impersonators, miscellaneous stories

8 NYC police impersonators accused of torturing, robbing drug dealers 8 NYC police impersonators accused of torturing, robbing drug dealers

Chicago: Teen cop impersonator drove squad car, worked full shift

Police impersonators: try this link
KXAN story KXAN version of story notice last line - (Oh really?)

Drug Arrests Were Real the Badge Was Fake Drug Arrests Were Real; the Badge Was Fake

Yes, there are other offices imitated, see this, Fake Priest Infiltrates St. Peter's

Car pulling you over -- is that a real cop? Car pulling you over -- is that a real cop?

Remember that any one can fake most any thing -- caveat emptor!

you ask the police officer you ask the police officer...        Public officers are merely the agents Public officers are merely the agents...
by what supposed by what supposed...       all tyranny needs all tyranny needs...
Whatever the form in which the government functions Whatever the form in which the government functions...        authority to question authority I, me, have authority to question authority

Who are you?  Who are you?

Who are you?  poster

See the public servant questionnaire

(Fake Debt Collectors Terrify Consumers)

Ticket Assassin: Guide to Traffic Stops

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

The one rule - put your opponent down.

challenge an officer´s authority on the street -- wait for court.

Message recently received: "My friend was pulled over for a taillight being out, and the officer ran her plates and saw that there was an outstanding warrant for an unpaid ticket for expired inspection. They told her to step out of the car and that if she had anything on her that, "now is the time to tell us." She came clean immediately as she was in possession of a controlled substance (cocaine, which was not in her system) and handed it over. They took her to jail and she´s being charged with a felony. What can she do?"
Reply: [from someone who is NOT an Attorney -- and that anything said is not to be considered legal advice - hey, the respondent may not even know what he/she is talking about.] Apparently your friend has not heard this, "They (Police, government agents, etc.) have nothing, they want everything and they want us to give it to them!" We, here at the School say, "Why?"
Rule one; avoid giving them any reason [articulate-able suspicion] to be interested in you - check often and keep lights, tires, car, etc., in working order - and of course, operate your car reasonably, defensively, and safely.
Rule two; avoid having any reason for them to detain you if they do become interested in you - settle past matters.
Rule three; if one has one or more of their asset identifiers (state plates, registration, etc.) and one has a state issued Driver License -- well, then one is expected to abide by the state´s rules and regulations - yes?
However, was it that you were in commerce? Remember that it is not up to you to prove that you weren't - it is up to them to prove that you were.
Rule four; avoid giving consent, avoid giving up rights. (Gee Mister [alleged police officer], what is your show of authority? ) The old, " is the time to tell us" bluff is used, and used with success, more times that one can imagine. One does have the right to remain quite. "Me, I don't accept your offer." -- "Me, I don't consent to this." -- "Me, I am competent to make an informed decision and I am unable to make legal determination about this matter until I have assistance of council." -- "Am I under arrest -- or am I free to go?" -- "What is that... it isn't mine... I don't know how it got there... are you guys planting stuff... setting me up?" (See, public servant questionnaire.)
Rule five; learn this stuff (and more) BEFORE it is needed!

Confidence = NO negotiation!

Remember: There is a cost for freedom -- as it is not free!

Lawful Arrest, Search, Seizure, FAQ

5 Federal Court Cases That Weakened The 4th Amendment

"Waivers of constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intellegent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences."
Brady v. U. S., 397 U.S. 742 (1970)

Review a recent Iowa case involving a warrantless search  STATE v. GARRISON

oath  Oath Acceptance

Postal Workers can drive without a driver license?
See JOHNSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND, 254 U.S. 51 (1920)
See also Lawyerdude for an illegal arrest...
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." Adams v. State, 121 Pa. 16, 48 S.E. 910 Also,
"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary." see, Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the supreme Court of the United States in John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.

All warfare is based on deception.
Officer must identify himself and show you ID if you request it. Also, officer cannot swear an oath in his own mind he has to swear to the complaint in front of a proper party to attest to the swearing, i.e. signing a ticket and giving it to you on the street doesn't get it anymore.
City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa vs. Atsinger, 617 NW 2d 272, 9-7-2000. (Iowa Supreme Court)
(See the public servant questionnaire)
[3] The fact the restraint on Ms. Spicer´s liberty was minimal does not make the restraint a reasonable one. The Fourth Amendment applies to all seizures of the person including those consuming no more than a minute. (United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, supra, 422 U.S. at pp. 879-880 [45 L.Ed.2d at pp. 615-616].)
PEOPLE v. SPICER, 157 Cal.App.3d 213
[Crim. No. 45072. Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Seven. June 15, 1984.]

The Fourth Amendment prohibits a police officer from arresting a person without probable cause.
Paff v. Kaletenbach, 204 F.3d 425, 435 (3d Cir. 2000).

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.

Did someone say, "I want to fight the ticket"?

VIDEO: How to beat a ticket!

VIDEO: James Hardin - Traffic Court

VIDEO: Right to travel without a license plates featuring Carl Miller,
(A transcript of these videos would be a great learing experience and a fine contribution.)    Constitutional Law Constitutional Law
Several other Carl Miller videos
Adjunct to Carl Miller´s presentation click here

"Jurisdiction is essential to give validity to the determinations of administrative agencies and
where jurisdictional requirements are not satisfied, the action of the agency is a nullity..."
City Street Improv. Co. v. Pearson, 181 C 640, 185 P. 962
O'Neill v. Dept. of Professional & Vocational Standards, 7 CA2d 393, 46 P.2d 234.

Eddie Craig´s presentation on traffic stops and how to act - more ...
What The Government Doesn´t Want You To Know About Your Driver License
Eddie Craig´s presentation material. (.zip file)

When whoever stops you asks, "Do you know why I stopped you?" ...consider saying, "No, I don't."
Giving a response like, "I was over the speed limit" or "I was weaving" - even if just a guess
...not only can be an admission of a violation (and maybe not the one you were stopped for)
but an indication of KNOWING the violation - which only makes it worse.

VIDEO: How To Act If You're  Stopped By the Police

Don't even consider driving while impaired!

Don't even consider attempting to control your road machine while impaired!

Remember that friends don't let friends drive drunk
For those who get this far:
The instant a citation, or warning, is issued, the motorist is free to leave!
TIP: Don't hang around and answer the usual drug interdiction questions, i.e.; "Are you carrying anything illegal?" If you have received a verbal warning or have your citation in hand and an officer continues questioning, reply with, "Gee, I thought I was free to leave and if I'm not then what are you holding me for?" The officer must explain why he is detaining you since he has already dealt with the alleged traffic violation. If there are no more violations, or [articulated] probable cause, he must let you go! This method stops you from having to go through the, "...can I search your car" process.
Brian Tracy: "Most people achieved their greatest success one step beyond what looked like their greatest failure."

A positive mental outlook and attitude is paramount, because if you think you can’t, then you can’t.
But, just because you think you can doesn't mean that you can if you don't acquire the awareness, skill and knowledge to succeed.

"Am I under arrest?"      "Am I free to go?"     ("I´m going to remain silent.")
"If I am not free to go then I must be under arrest. I do not consent. Do you have a warrant with my name on it?
What is your show of authority?"
"What is your probable / articulate-able cause for placing me under a warrant-less arrest? I do not consent."
If asked for ID, proof of insurance, or any other thing - ask,
"Gee, are you going to use this information in a criminal investigation?"
(Question: Do police ever get involved with a civil matter?)
Because, if it is to be used in any manner of [criminal] investigation then you are going to exercise your rights
especially the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and not to be a witness against one´s self.
(If you haven't seen it already, see James Duane´s presentation above.)

Know your rights and be awake when dealing with police officers.
As a lobbyist against liberty a Police Officer´s worst enemy is a well informed Citizen who knows their rights!

Whatever you say - speak to the microphone.

10 Rules for Dealing with Police (Full-Length)

Demand to know if the stop is a custodial interrogation as this demands the assistance of a lawyer,
see EDWARDS v. ARIZONA, 451 U. S. 477 (1981)

Keep Your Mouth Shut  Keep Your Mouth Shut

VIDEO: Traffic Court Top 5 List

As recently found on the Internet.

by what supposed by what supposed...        I do not understand I do not understand...

If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him.
If he is in superior strength, AVOID him.

Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998)--cannot search car in routine traffic stop!
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, No. 97—7597. Argued November 3, 1998 – Decided December 8, 1998
An Iowa policeman stopped petitioner Knowles for speeding and issued him a citation rather than arresting him. The officer then conducted a full search of the car, without either Knowles' consent or probable cause, found marijuana and a "pot pipe," and arrested Knowles. Before his trial on state drug charges, Knowles moved to suppress the evidence, arguing that because he had not been arrested, the search could not be sustained under the "search incident to arrest" exception recognized in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218. The trial court denied the motion and found Knowles guilty, based on state law giving officers authority to conduct a full-blown search of an automobile and driver where they issue a citation instead of making a custodial arrest. In affirming, the State Supreme Court applied its bright-line "search incident to citation" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, reasoning that so long as the officer had probable cause to make a custodial arrest, there need not in fact have been an arrest.

Held: The search at issue, authorized as it was by state law, nonetheless violates the Fourth Amendment. Neither of the two historical exceptions for the "search incident to arrest" exception, see Robinson, supra, at 234, is sufficient to justify the search in the present case. First, the threat to officer safety from issuing a traffic citation is a good deal less than in the case of a custodial arrest. While concern for safety during a routine traffic stop may justify the "minimal" additional intrusion of ordering a driver and passengers out of the car, it does not by itself justify the often considerably greater intrusion attending a full field-type search. Even without the search authority Iowa urges, officers have other, independent bases to search for weapons and protect themselves from danger. Second, the need to discover and preserve evidence does not exist in a traffic stop, for once Knowles was stopped for speeding and issued a citation, all evidence necessary to prosecute that offense had been obtained. Iowa's argument that a "search incident to citation" is justified because a suspect may try to hide evidence of his identity or of other crimes is unpersuasive. An officer may arrest a driver if he is not satisfied with the identification furnished, and the possibility that an officer would stumble onto evidence of an unrelated offense seems remote. Pp. 3—6. 569 N. W. 2d 601, reversed and remanded. Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

State v. Gibbons, 248 App. 859 (547 S.E.2d 679) (2001).

The officer, who acting alone had stopped the driver for a seat belt violation, made no attempt to investigate the seat belt violation but rather launched into an extensive series of unrelated questions that eventually led to the discovery of illegal drugs on the driver's person. Only later did he write the seat belt citation. We upheld the suppression of the drugs, emphasizing in Presiding Judge Pope's special concurrence (joined in by six other judges and quoting from Sims extensively) the trial court's finding that " '[r]ather than ticket [the driver] or release him, the officer decided to conduct a drug investigation.' It is this continued detention that makes the questioning and request to search without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity impermissible."

See also Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005)

The Supreme Court has ruled that as long as the police do not force an individual to do something, the individual is acting voluntarily, even if a normal person would feel very intimidated and would not reasonably feel they could say no.  See Florida v. Bostick, (89-1717), 501 U.S. 429 (1991) If you do what a policeman tells you to do before you are arrested, you are 'voluntarily' complying with their 'requests'.

Be as nice as possible, but stand firm on your rights! Read this about the Fourth & Fifth Amendments.
Never consent to a search. Don't resist, be respectful, but do not consent.  One has no idea as to what the cops are looking for, or how they will interpret what they find. Most important, whatever errors the police may have made in stopping you, or in the warrant, or in the subsequent search are irrelevant if one consents!
(If you haven't seen it already, see Professor James Duane's presentation above.)

Just Say 'No' to Police Searches |

Remember, they wouldn't be asking you
they didn't need your permission!

"Gee, is your request to search my car constitutionally based?"

How to Refuse a Police Search

VIDEO: Police search my car Part 1  /   Part 2

VIDEO: Abby Newman: Unlawful search


All SEIZURES of PROPERTY is an IN REM action period. Luis Ewing

Brendlin v California: Expansion of Fourth Amendment Standing or the End of a Legal Fiction?

Pot smell isn´t cause to arrest everyone in a car Pot smell isn't cause to arrest everyone in a car

Texas Lawyer Takes On Bloodthirsty Cops

Hospital refuses to draw blood for police cases

Peace proposals unaccompanied by a sworn covenant indicate a plot.

I have authority I have authority...

I do not understand I do not understand...         I simply do not understand I simply do not understand...

To sign or not to sign a ticket -- Texas Attorney General´s opinion items for consideration:
Opinion No. JC-0317
Re: Whether the addition of certain protest words to a traffic citation constitutes a valid promise to appear in court.
Opinion No. JC-0153
Re: Effect of certain protest words written beneath a person´s signature on a state document.

"Gee, is this ticket constitutionally valid?"

"Gee, this ticket doesn't seem to have a
[valid] statute number showing on it."

The following cases substantiate that it is a fact of law that the person asserting jurisdiction must,
when challenged, PROVE that jurisdiction exists:
McNutt v. G.M., 56 S. Ct. 789, 80 L.Ed. 1135
Griffin v. Mattews, 310 Supp. 341, 423, F.2d 272
Basso v. U.P.L., 495 F.2d 906
Thomson v. Gaskiel, 62 S.Ct. 673, 83 L.Ed. 111
Albrect v. U.S., 273 U.S. 1

"Gee, is this ticket appears to lack a competent fact witness."

Did someone say, "I want to fight the ticket" - in court?
(Remember that to fight, to argue, is to enter into 'their' jurisdiction and lose. Consider a conditional acceptance.)

Traffic Ticket Case Dismissed  Traffic Ticket Case Dismissed

Marc Stevens - Beating Civil Traffic Tickets Marc Stevens -  Beating Civil Traffic Tickets

Memorandum in Support California Traffic Case:  Memorandum in Support

Charles Sprinkler's motion

VIDEO: The Court of Public Relations

Questions for Police Officer in traffic court:

[You] "Thank you Officer {Jones} for being here today. You are properly sworn in?
[Yes] OK, please tell this court, did you file a valid cause of action against me?"
[Officer] "Yes."
[You] "OK, please tell this court just how many elements are in a valid cause of action."
You may hear, from prosecutor, something like, "Objection, calls for a legal conclusion, witness is not competent to testify."
Then you may, from judge, hear something like, "Objection sustained."
Then you say, "OK, then I move to strike the witness´s testimony." [testimony includes the ticket] "...and I move this matter dismissed."
[You] Smile ;)]
(Of course this entails the officer actually showing up (the prosecutor may try bluffing you on this, [you] just want to go on and have 'your day in court') -- if he or she doesn't - well they don't have a case then do they? {You} Smile ;) and say, "I want this matter dismissed."

Questions for Police Officer in traffic court:

[You] "In order to be a policeman you had to swear an oath to support both State and Federal Constitutions didn’t you?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "On the day and time you approach me you were armed were you not?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "Having sworn an oath to the constitution you attacked me by force of arms in an attempt to compel me to be a witness against myself in felony breach of your fiduciary duty pursuant to the oath you sworn."
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "I move to dismiss because the officer just impeached himself under oath."

by what supposed by what supposed...

DIALOG: In all matters - request [...if need be, demand] that
competent evidence of the Plaintiff´s claim be entered as evidence.

VIDEO: Impeach a witness

DIALOG: time you get a 'traffic ticket'; ask the court, and the policeman (on the stand), what makes them think your automobile is a 'motor vehicle'? Ask them, since you received a 'traffic ticket', just what goods were you 'trafficing' in? And since the fine is to be paid in so many 'dollars', ask them what a "dollar" is.
Watch them look at you like you are insane.
Speak clearly and loudly, tell them that you are competent to make an informed decision and that you are not able to understand the nature and cause of the charges unless, and until, they explain their semantics. Remember, in law or life, it is not wise to go passed an undefined word or phrase.

presumption Presumption

F.Y.I.: Believe it or not, everybody´s case is pretty much the same.
The "System" (b)leeds you to believe you are some kind of "special case."
The absurd accusations they have brought against you are NOT a "mistake."
It is a SCAM to keep you dizzy with and in fear.
Its NOT about "misunderstanding" you -- THEY ARE DOING IT DELIBERATELY!
Remember: Its their 'system' - not yours.

FOLKLORE? A man who, appeared on a criminal charge. The judge asked him if his name was "John Doe"
He replied; "My mother told me that was my name."
This statement then cannot be used to certify the identity of the defendant, as it is hearsay.
The judge looked at him a little funny, and asked, "How do you plead?"
To which the man replied,
"Judge, I'm ready to plead but first I want to know who is going to certify the charges to the court?"
That is all he said, and after the judge haggled with the clueless prosecutor a while, he cut him loose. Probably because they could not certify his identity, as he declined to testify as to his identity.

Consider being a Belligerent Claimant!


The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense, a/k/a: waiting for attack.
The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.

you ask the police officer you ask the police officer...

vanity Vanity

...about gas ...about gas

Leaving it up to the discretion of the police to decide who is suspicious? The courts have ruled that is unconstitutional, because it allows the preferences and prejudices of an individual to make the decision.

Are we ruled by law or by men? "Gee, Officer, what was your articulate-able reason for stopping me?"


JUDGE: "I know that is what the law says in the book, but that is not what it means.
We only use the law book as a guide. In this court I make the law."

PERSECUTED: Wow! You actually have that delegated power?
Then perhaps you´ll have no difficulty entering proof of that power
into the record of this matter --
and then I'll be happy to bow down and worship you.

vanity   Easy Reference Traffic Book Texas

(A transcription of any video presentation on this page would be great learning opportunity for the transcriber and a fine contribution to the page. Webmaster)

Trezevant v. City of Tampa Sets a precedent for a large dollar return for unlawful arrest and incarceration
Trezevant v. City of Tampa,  741 F.2d 336

In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack--the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.
NOTICE: Various presented entities are not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
AntiShyster Magazine Attention Signing the Constitution Away
Aware Belligerent Claimant
Bonds Citizenship / nationality related items
Education Graphics
Health related Admiralty related
Howard Griswold
Jerry Kirk Jurisdiction
Law related items Lee Brobst
Lewis Mohr Luis Ewing
Money Reading Material
Reading Room Stuff
Tax matters  
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it is fast, free and secure!

Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented as "" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of used throughout. "You" is in reference to the user / visitor.

This is the fine print that so important. Freedom School and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented. site relies on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.

The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone´s use and enjoyment of the website.

All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the site or material contained within.

GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit the site, we do collect non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to improve our Web site design and our online presence.
Visitors to this site who have Javascript enabled are tracked using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be using; your network location and IP address (this can include geographic data like the country, city and state you are in); your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the site; the pages you visit on the site; the amount of time you spend on each page of the site and referring site information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more information on Google´s privacy policies, visit:
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of reports about how visitors interact with their website so they can improve their website and how people find it. A different cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites that use it must update their privacy policy to include a notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a case-by-case basis." site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers´ DMCA Policy

the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.

If your copyrighted material has been posted on the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.

The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:

* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under which the material appears in search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
* A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)

Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at

Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly being filed.

Presentation Copyright© 2003, 2018
All Rights Reserved


Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional        Valid CSS!